Advertisement

University’s Inclusion in Providing Climate Services to Farmers: Is It Possible Without Agricultural Agents and Farmer Facilitators?

  • Yunita T. WinartoEmail author
  • Sue Walker
  • Rhino Ariefiansyah
  • Iqbal H. Lisan
  • Maudy Y. Bestari
  • Tiara Audina
Chapter
  • 46 Downloads
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

Since the early 1970s, agricultural extension services in Indonesia have been developed based on the “Training and Visit” model to reach targets of increasing crop productivity. Until recently, extension services have been neither modified nor improved to accommodate farmers’ needs to respond to the consequences of climate change. Accordingly, farmers have been left to fend for themselves, often helpless to survive the impacts of increasing climate variability. Significant reductions in yields and harvest failures have been common in many parts of Indonesia. Two crucial dimensions have been missing in the existing extension approach, nurturance and trust. This paper examines recent agrometeorological improvements by farmers, through Science Field Shops (SFSs) provided by anthropologists and their students from Universitas Indonesia, in collaboration with agrometeorologists from the University of the Free State, and earlier from C. J. Stigter (Agromet Vision). Based on the lessons learned over the past decade, where agricultural extension practitioners provided climate services without “nurture and trust” built into the ongoing collaboration between scientists, students, farmers, and agricultural agents; the educational commitment did not yield effective results. The strategies and processes developed by the university’s interdisciplinary team show how those two dimensions were incorporated when SFSs were introduced in a new location, Sumedang Regency in West Java Province. SFSs included rainfall observers, scientists and students, as well as high-ranking local agricultural officials and farmer facilitators. They proved to be vital to the furtherance of farmers’ lifelong education and livelihoods.

Keywords

University’s inclusion Nurture and trust Agricultural extension Climate services Science Field Shops 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the support of Universitas Indonesia through its Directorate for Innovation and Business Incubation (2018–2019), which enabled the SFSs to be implemented in the Regency of Sumedang. Our sincere gratitude also to: the late Prof. C. J. Stigter, who initiated the establishment of the SFSs in Indonesia; the following previous donor agencies (2013–2018): Australia Research Council; Knowledge Sector Initiative (Australian and Indonesian bilateral agreement); and Indonesia Climate Change Trust Fund, of the Ministry for Planning and Development. Without the collaboration of Sumedang Agricultural Regency Office, the farmers, research assistants and students from the Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, and The South African National Research Foundation via the University of the Free State, Bloemfontein for funding Prof Sue Walker’s international travel, the work would not be accomplished. Our gratitude to their agreement to collaborate.

References

  1. Brown ME, Funk CC (2008) Food security under climate change. Science 319(5863):580–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buontempo C, Hewitt CD, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Dessai S (2014) Climate service development, delivery and use in Europe at monthly to inter-annual timescale. Clim Risk Manage 6:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarkson G, Dorward P, Kagabo D, Nsengiyumva G (2017) Climate services for agriculture in Rwanda: initial findings from PICSA monitoring and evaluation. Climate change, agriculture, and food security info note, 1–4 OctGoogle Scholar
  4. Dayamba DS, Ky-Dembele C, Bayala J, Dorward P, Clarkson G, Sonogo D, Mamadou LP, Traore I, Diakite A, Nenkam A, Binam OM, Zougmore R (2018) Assessment of the use of participatory integrated climate services for agriculture (PICSA) approach by farmers to manage climate risk in Mali and Senegal. Clim Serv 12:7–35Google Scholar
  5. Fischer G, Shah M, van Velthuizen H (2002) Climate change and agricultural vulnerability. IIASA Publications Department, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  6. Haines S (2019) Managing expectations: articulating expertise in climate services for agriculture in Belize. Clim Change.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2357-1
  7. Hidayat B (2011) The sky and the agro-bio-climatology of Java: need critical reevalution due to environmental change. In: Nakamura T, Orchiston W, Soma M, Strom R (eds) Proceedings of the seventh international conference on oriental astronomy, national astronomical observation of Japan, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  8. Howden SM, Soussana JF, Tubiello FN, Chhetri N, Dunlop M, Meinke H (2007) Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:19691–19696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jennings S, Magrath J (2009) What happened to the seasons? OXFAM research report, October. https://www.oxfam.org.uk/page-not-found?aspxerrorpath=/resources/policy/climate_change/downloads/research_what_happen%20ed_to_seasons.pdf. Retrieved on 25 Sept 2015
  10. Nelson GC, Rosegrant MW, Koo J, Robertson R, Sulser T, Zhu T, Ringler C, Msangi S, Palazzo A, Batka M, Magalhaes M, Valmonte-santos R, Ewing M, Lee D (2009) Climate change: impact on agriculture and costs of adaptation., International Food Policy Research Institute Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Parry ML, Rosenzweig C, Iglesias A, Livermore M, Fischer G (2004) Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Glob Environ Change A 14:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Prihandiani AF (2017) Diseminasi pembelajaran agrometeorologi: variasi luaran dari keagensian petani pengukur curah hujan Indramayu. Unpublished undergraduate thesis. Universitas Indonesia, Depok, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  13. Rovihansyah UP (2014) Dinamika variasi pengetahuan petani Klub Pengukur Curah Hujan Indramayu dalam mengantisipasi kondisi cuaca pada musim rendheng 2013–2014, Unpublished undergraduate thesis. Universitas Indonesia, Depok, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  14. Schmidhuber J, Tubiello FN (2007) Global food security under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:19703–19708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Siregar RP, Crane TA (2011) Climate information and agricultural practice in adaptation to climate variability: the case of climate field schools in Indramayu, Indonesia. Cult Agric Food Environ 33(2):55–69.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-9561.2011.01050
  16. Stigter CJ (2016) Climate crisis in the livelihood of Indonesian farmers. In: Winarto YT (ed) Krisis Pangan dan “Sesat Pikir”: Mengapa Masih Berlanjut? Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia, pp 33–40Google Scholar
  17. Stigter K, Winarto YT (2015) Agrometeorological learning: exchanges of traditional, more recent empirical knowledge and scientific knowledge between farmers, extension intermediaries and scientists. Manuscript presented in the workshop and exhibition of Perlu Solusi Baru untuk Masalah Baru karena Perubahan Iklim: Belajar Agrometeorologi dalam Warung Ilmiah Lapangan. Center for Anthropological Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia & Indramayu Rainfall Observers Club & KONSEPSI & Pandan Wangi Rainfall Observers Group, Indramayu and Selong, Indonesia, 5 NovGoogle Scholar
  18. Stigter K, Winarto YT (2016) Science field shops with farmer extension intermediaries for climate services in agriculture. Training of trainers (ToT) roving seminar training guidance (English and Bahasa Indonesia), Unpublished manuscript, Universitas Indonesia. Depok, Indonesia & Bruchem, the Netherlands/Bondowoso, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  19. Stigter K, Winarto YT, Wicaksono MT (2016) Science field shops: an innovative agricultural extension approach for adaptation to climate change, applied with farmers in Indonesia. In: Filho WL, Adamson K, Dunk RM, Azeiteiro UM, Illingworth S, Alves F (eds) Implementing climate change adaptation in cities and communities: integrating strategies and educational approaches. Springer, Switzerland, pp 391–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sumedang BPSK (2018) Kabupaten Sumedang dalam Angka. BPS Kabupaten Sumedang, Bandung, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  21. Tall A, Coulibaly JY, Diop M (2018) Do climate services make a difference? A review of evaluation methodologies and practices to assess the value of climate information services for farmers: implication for Africa. Clim Serv 11:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Upaya Khusus (UPSUS) Swasembada Pangan 2015–2017, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Kementerian Pertanian, Jakarta, Indonesia http://biogen.litbang.pertanian.go.id/2015/02/upaya-khusus-upsus-swasembada-pangan-2015-2017/. Retrieved on 07 Mar 2019
  23. Winarto YT (2004) Seeds of knowledge: the beginning of integrated pest management in Java. Monograph #53. Yale Southeast Asian Studies, New Haven, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Winarto YT, Stigter K (eds) (2011) Agrometeorological learning: coping better with climate change. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
  25. Winarto YT, Stigter K (2013) Science Field Shops to reduce climate vulnerabilities: an inter- and transdisciplinary educational commitment. Collaborative Anthropol 6:419–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Winarto YT, Stigter K (2016) Incremental learning and gradual changes: ‘science field shops’ as an educational approach to coping better with climate change in agriculture. In: Wilson L, Stevenson C (eds) Promoting climate change awareness through environmental education. IGI Global Publisher, Hershey, pp 60–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Winarto YT, Stigter K (2017) Anthropology teaming up with agrometeorology: getting university science to assist farmers with climate resilience. Asian Polit Policy 9(3):479–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Winarto YT, Stigter K (CJ), Ariefiansyah R (2017) Anticipating the future. Inside Indonesia 127, Jan–MarchGoogle Scholar
  29. Winarto YT, Walker S, Ariefiansyah R (2017) People, clouds and roots: farmers learning to adapt. Unpublished manuscript presented in the international workshop on agriculture in the anthropocene. Cambridge University, Cambridge, 27–28 OctGoogle Scholar
  30. Winarto YT, Walker S, Ariefiansyah R, Prihandiani AF, Taqiuddin M, Nugroho ZC (2018a) Institutionalizing science field shops: developing response farming to climate change. Global alliance for climate smart agriculture (GACSA), Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/3/I8454EN/i8454en.pdf
  31. Winarto YT, Ariefiansyah R, Prihandiani AF, Taqiuddin M (2018b) Nurturance and trust in developing agrometeorological learning in a changing climate: the science field shops in Indonesia. Indo Malay World 46(136):360–381.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2017.1502514
  32. Winarto YT, Walker S, Ariefiansyah R (2019) People, clouds and roots: between the unseen, the seen, and the unforeseen. Nat Cult (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yunita T. Winarto
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sue Walker
    • 2
  • Rhino Ariefiansyah
    • 1
  • Iqbal H. Lisan
    • 1
  • Maudy Y. Bestari
    • 1
  • Tiara Audina
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Political SciencesUniversitas IndonesiaDepokIndonesia
  2. 2.Department of Soil, Crop & Climate Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural SciencesUniversity of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations