Advertisement

Conceptual Design and Comparative CFD Analyses on Unmanned Amphibious Vehicle for Crack Detection

  • R. VijayanandhEmail author
  • M. Senthil Kumar
  • S. Rahul
  • E. Thamizhanbu
  • M. Durai Isaac Jafferson
Conference paper
  • 38 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 51)

Abstract

Nowadays, Unmanned Amphibious Vehicles (UAVs) is being suggested for critical applications like fish detection, difficult mapping and atmosphere studies. One such filed are surface cracks inspection and in specific a big structure like dams might suffer a lot due to external structural cracks. As dams are being considered the cracks not only exist over the water surface it might also exist underwater, to inspect such cracks an UAV carrying with sensors is required. The major unique feature applied in this underwater vehicle is a common material for both the environments with the help of Kevlar composite. Generally, impact load withstanding capability is high in the Kevlar, which shortlisted Kevlar as suitable for an amphibious vehicle. For the purpose of inspection, image processing photogrammetric method is followed, in which the external surface of the dam is captured by a high definition camera which can take pictures in both air and in water is used. The pictures are then stitched together to get a complete pictorial view of the external surface of the dam. From the surface is further inspected to detect cracks and other structural defects. The entire image processing has been analyzed with the help of MATLAB, in addition to that the photogrammetric method is also suggested for crack detection. For the theoretical design approach of a UAV has been carried out for the purpose of components selection and thereby the conceptual design of UAV is modeled with the help of CATIA V5. The integrated working environment have been analyzed with the help of ANSYS Workbench 16.2.

Keywords

Inspection Propeller Amphibious vehicle Underwater Photogrammetric Cracks detection 

References

  1. 1.
    Raj Kumar G et al (2017) Conceptual design and structural analysis of integrated composite micro aerial vehicle. J Adv Res Dyn Control Syst 9((Sp–14)):857–881Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michelson RC et al (2010) Overview of micro air vehicle system design and integration issues, Georgia Tech Research Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470686652.eae401
  3. 3.
    Esakki B et al (2018) Design of amphibious vehicle for unmanned 3 mission in water quality monitoring using IoT. Sensors 18:3318. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18103318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sadraey M (2010) A systems engineering approach to unmanned aerial vehicle design. In: 10th AIAA aviation technology, integration, and operations (ATIO) conference, 13–15 Sep 2010, Fort Worth, TexasGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collins KA (1993) A concept of unmanned aerial vehicles in amphibious operations. Doctoral dissertation, Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate SchoolGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vijayanandh R et al (2017) Design, fabrication and simulation of hexacopter for forest surveillance. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci. 12(12):3879–3884. ISSN: 1819-6608Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pisanich G, Morris S (2002) Fielding an amphibious UAV: development, results, and lessons learned. In: Digital avionics systems conference, 2002. Proceedings. The 21st IEEE, vol 2, pp 8C4–8C4Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vijayanandh R et al (2017) Numerical study on structural health monitoring for unmanned aerial vehicle. J Adv Res Dyn Control Syst 9(6):1937–1958Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang Z-J et al (2018) Conceptual design of a water-air amphibious unmanned vehicle. In: 2nd international conference on modeling, simulation and optimization technologies and applications (MSOTA 2018) ISBN: 978-1-60595-594-0Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frejek M, Nokleby S (2008) Design of a small-scale autonomous amphibious vehicle. In: Electrical and computer engineering, 2008. CCECE 2008. Canadian conference on IEEE, pp 000781–000786Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wei D et al (2018) Foreign maritime unmanned vehicle development status and trend. J Ordnance Equip Eng 39(7):33–35Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li X, Wang Z (2003) Unmanned underwater vehicle technologies. Mar Electr Technol 6:12–15Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu F (2014) Conceptual design and sailing stability study on water air amphibious unmanned ship, Master degree thesis of Jiangsu University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Vijayanandh
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Senthil Kumar
    • 1
  • S. Rahul
    • 1
  • E. Thamizhanbu
    • 1
  • M. Durai Isaac Jafferson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Aeronautical EngineeringKumaraguru College of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations