Advertisement

Artificial Intelligence in the Intensive Care Unit

  • G. GutierrezEmail author
Chapter
  • 88 Downloads
Part of the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine book series (AUICEM)

Abstract

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to the monitoring and treatment of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is advancing rapidly from future possibility to everyday reality. Developments in computer science, spurred by advances in microprocessor power and storage capacity, have made possible the development of complex and powerful machine learning algorithms. Clinical studies are being published with increasing frequency describing the use of this technique in monitoring and caring for critically ill patients. These studies include work on the early diagnosis of sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), mortality prediction models, algorithms to guide fluid and pressor resuscitation, image analysis, alarm monitoring, and mechanical ventilation. The aim of this chapter is to provide the reader with a brief, and hopefully understandable, introduction to the principles of AI. Included are a brief description of machine learning techniques and a succinct analysis of recent studies applying these techniques to the monitoring of critically ill patients, placing an emphasis on mechanical ventilation.

Keywords

Mechanical ventilation Classification algorithms Machine learning Intelligent monitors Ventilator asynchrony 

References

  1. 1.
    Proposed Regulatory Framework for Modifications to Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD). https://www.fda.gov/media/122535/download. Accessed 20 Aug 2019.
  2. 2.
    Gottfredson LS. Mainstream science on intelligence: an editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence. 1997;24:13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gobet F, Clarkson G. Chunks in expert memory: evidence for the magical number four ... Or is it two? Memory. 2004;12:732–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gardner RM, Scoville OP, West BJ, Bateman B, Cundick RM Jr, Clemmer TP. Integrated computer systems for monitoring of the critically ill. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1977;1:301–7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grossman R, Hew E, Aberman A. Assessment of the ability to manage patients on mechanical ventilators using a computer model. Acute Care. 1983–1984;10:95–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ohlson KB, Westenskow DR, Jordan WS. A microprocessor based feedback controller for mechanical ventilation. Ann Biomed Eng. 1982;10:35–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sittig DF, Gardner RM, Pace NL, Morris AH, Beck E. Computerized management of patient care in a complex, controlled clinical trial in the intensive care unit. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 1989;30:77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henderson S, Crapo RO, Wallace CJ, East TD, Morris AH, Gardner RM. Performance of computerized protocols for the management of arterial oxygenation in an intensive care unit. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1991-1992;8:271–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Müller AC, Guido S. Introduction to machine learning with Python: a guide for data scientists. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media; 2017.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Escobar GJ, Turk BJ, Ragins A, et al. Piloting electronic medical record-based early detection of inpatient deterioration in community hospitals. J Hosp Med. 2016;11(Suppl 1):S18–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beam AL, Kohane IS. Big data and machine learning in health care. JAMA. 2018;319:1317–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJWL. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18:500–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Litjens G, Sánchez CI, Timofeeva N, et al. Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26286.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kassahun Y, Yu B, Tibebu AT, et al. Surgical robotics beyond enhanced dexterity instrumentation: a survey of machine learning techniques and their role in intelligent and autonomous surgical actions. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016;11:553–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson KW, Torres Soto J, Glicksberg BS, et al. Artificial intelligence in cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2668–79.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choi E, Schuetz A, Stweart WF, Sun J. Using recurrent neural network models for early detection of heart failure onset. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24:361–70.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tang TT, Zawaski JA, Francis KN, Qutub AA, Gaber MW. Image-based classification of tumor type and growth rate using machine learning: a preclinical study. Sci Rep. 2019;9:12529.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Houthooft R, Ruyssinck J, van der Herten J, et al. Predictive modelling of survival and length of stay in critically ill patients using sequential organ failure scores. Artif Intell Med. 2015;63:191–207.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nassar AP Jr, Caruso P. ICU physicians are unable to accurately predict length of stay at admission: a prospective study. Int J Quat Health Care. 2006;1:99–103.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sotoodeh M, Ho JC. Improving length of stay prediction using a hidden Markov model. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019;2019:425–34.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lin YW, Zhou Y, Faghri F, Shaw MJ, Campbell RH. Analysis and prediction of unplanned intensive care unit readmission using recurrent neural networks with lon short term memory. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0218942.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Awad A, Bader-El-Den M, McNicholas J, Briggs J. Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach. Int J Med Inform. 2017;108:185–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Awad A, Bader-El-Den M, McNicholas J, Briggs J, El-Sonbaty Y. Predicting hospital mortality for intensive care unit patients: time-series analysis. Health Informatics J. 2019; July 26, https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219850323 [Epub ahead of print].
  24. 24.
    Holmgren G, Andersson P, Jakobsson A, Frigyesi A. Artificial neural networks improve and simplify intensive care mortality prognostication: a national cohort study of 217,289 first-time intensive care unit admissions. J Intensive Care. 2019;7:44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rau CS, Wu SC, Chuang JF, et al. Machine learning models of survival prediction in trauma patients. J Clin Med. 2019;8:799.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim SY, Kim S, Cho J, et al. A deep learning model for real-time mortality prediction in critically ill children. Crit Care. 2019;23:279.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yoon JH, Mu L, Chen L, et al. Predicting tachycardia as a surrogate for instability in the intensive care unit. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019;33:973–98.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vistisen ST, Johnson AEW, Scheeren TWL. Predicting vital sign deterioration with artificial intelligence or machine learning. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019;33:949–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Giannini HM, Ginestra JC, Chivers C, et al. A machine learning algorithm to predict severe sepsis and septic shock: development, implementation, and impact on clinical practice. Crit Care Med. 2019;47:1485–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Banerjee I, Sofela M, Yang J, et al. Development and performance of the pulmonary embolism result forecast model (PERFORM) for computed tomography clinical decision support. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e198719.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zeiberg D, Prahlad T, Nallamothu BK, Iwashyna TJ, Wiens J, Sjoding MW. Machine learning for patient risk stratification for acute respiratory distress syndrome. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0214465.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tran NK, Sen S, Palmieri TL, Lima K, Falwell S, Wajda J, Rashidi HH. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for predicting acute kidney injury in severely burned patients: a proof of concept. Burns. 2019;45:1350–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Flechet M, Falini S, Bonetti C, et al. Machine learning versus physicians’ prediction of acute kidney injury in critically ill adults: a prospective evaluation of the AKIpredictor. Crit Care. 2019;23:282.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang Z, Ho KM, Hong Y. Machine learning for the prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with oliguric acute kidney injury in critical care. Crit Care. 2019;23:112.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li BY, Oh J, Young VB, Rao K, Wiens J. Using machine learning and the electronic health record to predict complicated Clostridium difficile infection. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6:ofz186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thille A, Rodriguez P, Cabello B, Lellouche F, Brochard L. Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1515–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen CW, Lin WC, Hsu CH, Cheng KS, Lo CS. Detecting ineffective triggering in the expiratory phase in mechanically ventilated patients based on airway flow and pressure deflection: feasibility of using a computer algorithm. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:455–61.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Blanch L, Sales B, Montanya J, et al. Validation of the better care® system to detect ineffective efforts during expiration in mechanically ventilated patients: a pilot study. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:772–80.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Marchuk Y, Magrans R, Sales B, et al. Predicting patient-ventilator asynchronies with hidden Markov models. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17614.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rehm GB, Han J, Kuhn B, et al. Creation of a robust and generalizable machine learning classifier for patient ventilator asynchrony. Methods Inf Med. 2018;57:208–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Adams JY, Lieng MK, Kuhn BT, et al. Development and validation of a multi-algorithm analytic platform to detect off-target mechanical ventilation. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14980.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sottile PD, Albers D, Higgins C, Mckeehan J, Moss MM. The association between ventilator dyssynchrony, delivered tidal volume, and sedation using a novel automated ventilator dyssynchrony detection algorithm. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:e151–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gholami B, Phan TS, Haddad WM, et al. Replicating human expertise of mechanical ventilation waveform analysis in detecting patient-ventilator cycling asynchrony using machine learning. Comput Biol Med. 2018;97:137–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mulqueeny Q, Redmond SJ, Tassaux D, et al. Automated detection of asynchrony in patient-ventilator interaction. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:5324–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Loo NL, Chiew YS, Tan CP, Arunachalam G, Ralib AM, Mat-Nor MB. A machine learning model for real-time asynchronous breathing monitoring. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2018;51:378–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sjoding MW, Hofer TP, Co I, Courey A, Cooke CR, Iwashyna TJ. Interobserver reliability of the Berlin ARDS definition and strategies to improve the reliability of ARDS diagnosis. Chest. 2018;153:361–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nicolela MT, Drance SM, Broadway DC, Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, LeBlanc RP. Agreement among clinicians in the recognition of patterns of optic disk damage in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:836–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Morris AH. Human cognitive limitations. Broad, consistent, clinical application of physiological principles will require decision support. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(Suppl 1):S53–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine DivisionThe George Washington UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations