Interventions to Enhance Academic Engagement

  • Amy L. ReschlyEmail author


Academic engagement may be thought of in terms of investment and participation in instruction, work, and academic tasks (Reschly et al. Best practices in fostering student engagement. In: Thomas A, Harrison P (eds) Best practices in school psychology: Student level services, 6th edn. National Association of School Psychologists, Bethesda, pp 37–50, 2014). It is strongly associated with student achievement. Indicators of students’ academic engagement are observable and available to educators (e.g., time-on-task, homework completion, grades, credits earned). Academic engagement is highly influenced by school and classroom contexts. Thus, interventions address how time is used and increasing students’ interactions and active involvement with learning. This chapter provides an overview of the research on indicators of academic engagement and strategies and interventions to enhance academic engagement at both universal and more intensive levels.


Academic engagement Academic engagement intervention Time-on-task Academic engaged time Peer tutoring Homework completion intervention 


  1. Algozzine, B., Ysseldyke, J., & Elliott, J. (1997). Strategies and tactics for effective instruction (2nd ed.). Sopris West, Longmont, CO.Google Scholar
  2. Allsop, D. H. (1997). Using ClassWide Peer Tutoring to teach beginning algebra problem-solving skills in heterogeneous classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 367–379.
  3. Balfanz, R., & Byrnes, V. (2019). Early warning indicators and intervention systems: State of the Field (pp. 45–54) In J. Fredricks, A. Reschly, & S. Christenson (Eds.). Handbook of student engagement interventions. Elsevier: London.Google Scholar
  4. Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., & MacIver, D. J. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42, 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowman-Perrott, L., Burke, M., Zhang, N., & Zaini, S. (2014). Direct and collateral benefits of peer tutoring on social and behavioral outcomes: A meta-analysis of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 43, 260–285.Google Scholar
  6. Briesch, A. M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2009). Review and analysis of literature on self-management interventions to promote appropriate classroom behaviors (1988-2008). School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 106–118. Scholar
  7. Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41, 1069–1077. Scholar
  8. Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Third handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328–375). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Bryan, T., & Burstein, K. (2004) Teacher-selected strategies for improving homework completion. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 263–275. https://doi.og/10.1177/074193259801900502
  10. Burks, M. (2004). Effects of ClassWide Peer Tutoring on the number of words spelled correctly by students with LD. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39, 301–304.
  11. Calhoon, M. B., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). The effects of Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies and Curriculum-Based Measurement on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carl, B., Richardson, J. T., Cheng, E., Kim, E., & Meyer, R. H. (2013). Theory and application of early warning systems for high school and beyond. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 18, 29–49. Scholar
  13. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.Google Scholar
  14. Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll model: A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher, 18, 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chafouleas, S. M., Sanetti, L. M. H., Jaffrey, R., & Fallon, L. M. (2012). An evaluation of a classwide intervention package involving self-management and a group contingency on classroom behavior of middle school students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21, 34–57. Scholar
  16. Christenson, S. L., & Reschly, A. L. (2010). Check & Connect: Enhancing school completion through student engagement. In E. Doll & J. Charvat (Eds.), Handbook of prevention science (pp. 327–348). New York, NY: Routledge – Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  17. Codding, R. S., & Smyth, C. A. (2009). Using performance feedback to decrease transition time and examine collateral effects on academic engagement. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 18, 325–345. Scholar
  18. Cook, S. B., Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Castro, G. C. (1985). Handicapped students as tutors. Journal of Special Education, 19, 483–492. Scholar
  19. Cooper, H. (1989a). Synthesis of research on homework. Educational Leadership, 47, 85–91.Google Scholar
  20. Cooper, H. (1989b). Homework. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  21. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1–62. Scholar
  22. DePaoli, J. L., Balfanz, R., Atwell, M. N., & Bridgeland, J. (2018). Building a grad nation: Progress and challenge in raising high school graduation rates. Baltimore, MD: Civic Enterprises, Every Graduates Center/Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  23. Department of Education. (2018). Issue brief: Credit recovery. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  24. DukeToday. (2006, March 7). Duke study: Homework helps students succeed in school as long as there isn’t too much. Duke Today. Retrieved from:
  25. Fallon, L. M., Collier-Meek, M. A., & Kurtz, K. D. (2019). Feasible coaching supports to promote teachers’ classroom management in high-need settings: An experimental single case design study. School Psychology Review, 48, 3–17.
  26. Fantuzzo, J. W., & Polite, K. (1990). School-based, behavioral self-management: A review and analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 5, 180–198. Scholar
  27. Farbman, D. (2012). The case for improving and expanding time in school: A review of key research and practice. Boston, MA: National Center on Time and Learning. Scholar
  28. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174–206.
  29. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N. J., & Braun, M. (2001). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Karns, K. (2001). Enhancing kindergartners’ mathematical development: Effects of Peer Assisted Learning Strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gettinger, M., & Ball, C. (2008). Best practices in increasing academic engaged time. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1043–1075). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  32. Gettinger, M., & Miller, K. (2014). Best practices in increasing academic engaged time. In P. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Student-level services. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  33. Gettinger, M., & Walther, M. J. (2012). Classroom strategies to enhance academic engaged time. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 653–673). Boston, MD: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 732–749. Scholar
  35. Greenwood, C. E., Terry, B., Utley, C. A., Montagna, D., & Walker, D. (1993). Achievement, placement, and services: Middle school benefits of ClassWide Peer Tutoring used at the elementary schools. School Psychology Review, 22, 497–516.Google Scholar
  36. Greenwood, C. R., Dinwiddie, G., Bailey, V., Carta, J. J., Dorsey, D., Kohler, F. W., … Schulte, D. (1987). Field replication of ClassWide Peer Tutoring. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 151–160.
  37. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London; New York: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
  38. Hawkins, R. O., Musti-Rao, S., Hughes, C., Berry, L., & McGuire, S. (2009). Applying a randomized interdependent group contingency component to ClassWide Peer Tutoring for multiplication fact fluency. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 300–318.
  39. Hoff, K. E., & Ervin, R. A. (2013). Extending self-management strategies: The use of a class-wide approach. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 151–164. Scholar
  40. Jensen, W. R., Sheridan, S. M., Olympia, D., & Andrews, D. (1994). Homework and students with learning disabilities and behavior disorders: A practical, parent-based approach. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 538–548. Scholar
  41. Kamps, D. M., Barbetta, P. M., Leonard, B. R., & Delquadri, J. (1994). ClassWide Peer Tutoring: An integration strategy to improve reading skills and promote peer interactions among students with autism and general education peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 49–61.
  42. Kamps, D. M., Greenwood, C., Arreaga-Mayer, C., Veerkamp, M. B., Utley, C., Tapia, Y., … Bannister, H. (2008). The efficacy of ClassWide Peer Tutoring in middle schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 119–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Keith, T. Z., Diamond-Hallam, C., & Fine, J. G. (2004). Longitudinal effects of in-school and out-of-school homework on high school grades. School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 187–211. Scholar
  44. Kohn, A. (2006). The homework myth: Why our kids get too much of a bad thing. Cambridge, MA: De Capo Life Long Books.Google Scholar
  45. Langberg, J. M. (2011). Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills (HOPS) interventions. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  46. Langberg, J. M., Epstein, J. N., Becker, S. P., Girio-Herrera, E., & Vaughn, A. J. (2012). Evaluation of the Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills (HOPS) intervention for middle school students with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder as implemented by school mental health providers. School Psychology Review, 41, 342–364.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Langberg, J. M., Epstein, J. N., Urbanowicz, C. M., Simon, J. O., & Graham, A. J. (2008). Efficacy of an organization skills intervention to improve the academic functioning of students with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 407–417.
  48. Livingston, G. (2019). The way U.S. teens spend their time is changing, but differences between boys and girls persist. FACTANK: News in the numbers, Pew Research Center.
  49. Mathes, P. M., Howard, J. K., Allen, S. H., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies for first-grade readers: Responding to the needs of diversity. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 62–94.
  50. Mautone, J. A., Marshall, S. A., Sharman, J., Eiraldi, R. B., Jawad, A. F., & Power, T. J. (2012). Development of a family-school intervention for young children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. School Psychology Review, 41, 447–466.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. National Education Commission on Time and Learning. (2005). Prisoners of time: Report of the National Commission on Time and Learning. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  52. Power, T. J., Mautone, J. A., Soffer, S. L., Clarke, A. T., Marshall, S. A., Sharman, J., … Jawad, A. F. (2012). A family-school intervention for children with ADHD: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 611–623. Scholar
  53. Pressman, R. M., Sugarman, D. B., Nemon, M. L., Desjarlais, J., Owens, J. A., & Schettini-Evans, A. (2015). Homework and family stress: With consideration of parents’ self confidence, educational level, and cultural background. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 43, 297–313. Scholar
  54. Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., & Pohl, A. (2014). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In A. Thomas & P. Harrison (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Student level services (6th ed., pp. 37–50). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  55. Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). Boston, MD: Springer. Scholar
  56. Reschly, A. L. & Christenson, S. L. (2019, September). Lowering the high school dropout rate: Lessons from the research (PDK Primer #2). Arlington, VA: Phi Delta Kappa.Google Scholar
  57. Saenz, L. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies for English language earners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71, 213–247.
  58. Sheridan, S. M. (2009). Commentary: Homework interventions for children with attention and learning problems: Where is the “home” in “homework?” School Psychology Review, 38, 334–338.Google Scholar
  59. Shernoff, E. S., Frazier, S. L., Martinez-Lora, A. M., Lakind, D., Atkins, M. S., Jakobsons, L., … Patel, D. A. (2016). Expanding the role of school psychologists to support early career teachers: A mixed-method study. School Psychology Review, 45, 226–249. Scholar
  60. Sprick, R. (2009). CHAMPS: A proactive & positive approach to classroom management. Eugene, OR: Ancora.Google Scholar
  61. Sprick, R., Knight, J., Reinke, W., Skyles, T. M., & Barnes, L. (2010). Coaching classroom management: Strategies & tools for administrators & coaches (2nd ed.). Eugene, OR: Ancora.Google Scholar
  62. Theodore, L. A., Dioguardi, R. J., Hughes, T. L., Aloiso, D., Carlo, M., & Eccles, D. (2009). A class-wide intervention for improving homework performance. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 19, 275–299. Scholar
  63. VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2014). Best practices in can’t do/won’t do academic assessment. In P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Data-based and collaborative decision making. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  64. Veerkamp, M. B., Kamps, D. M., & Cooper, L. (2007). The effects of ClassWide Peer Tutoring on the reading achievement of urban middle school students. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 21–51.Google Scholar
  65. Ysseldyke, J. E., & Christenson, S. L. (2002). FAAB: Functional Assessment of Academic Behavior: Creating successful learning environments. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology, University of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations