Advertisement

Designing Instruction for the Age of Singularity: A Transactional View as to How Knowledge Is Synthesized

  • Robert F. KennyEmail author
  • Glenda A. Hartley Gunter
Chapter
  • 63 Downloads
Part of the Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations book series (ECTII)

Abstract

Historically, knowledge has been viewed as an asset in that, once it is “owned” (i.e., acquired) by an individual, it can never be taken away (Rowley, 2000). First and foremost, we need to distinguish between the concepts of information acquisition and knowledge acquisition. The latter is the third in a five-step process of deep learning with data, information, understanding, and wisdom filling out the continuum (Ackoff, 1999). For this reason, we suggest that the term “knowledge acquisition” that appears to be so often in the literature may actually be a misnomer (Compton & Jensen, 1990). What many may be referring to is actually information acquisition. For the purposes of this chapter, however, we may interchange the two terms with this caveat in mind.

References

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (1999). Ackoff’s best. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Borel, E. (1913). Mécanique statistique et irréversibilité. Paris: Journal of Physics, 5(3), 189–196.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J. S. (2000). Growing up: Digital: How the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn, change. The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(2), 11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380009601719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruder, P. (2014). Gadgets go to school: The benefits and risks of BYOD (bring your own device). Educational Digest, 80, 15–18. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy1.acu.edu.au/docview/1619303677?accountid=8194Google Scholar
  5. Caulking, J. M. (1967, March 18). A schoolman’s guide to Marshall McLuhan. Saturday Review, pp. 51–53, 71–72.Google Scholar
  6. Compton, P., & Jensen, R. (1990). A philosophical basis for knowledge acquisition. Knowledge Acquisition, 2(3), 241–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042-8143(05)80017-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dalkir, K. (2017). Knowledge management in theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eddington, A. (1928). The nature of the physical world. The Gifford lectures. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Efimova, L. (2004). Discovering the iceberg of knowledge work. Paper presented at the Fifth European Conference on Organisational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities (OKLV 2004) Innsbruck, Austria, 2–3 Apr. https://doc.telin.nl/dscgi/ds.py/Get/File-34786
  10. Fukuyama, F. (2003). Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Picador McMillan.Google Scholar
  11. Gilder, G. (2018). Life after Google: The fall of big data and the rise of the blockchain economy. Washington, DC: Regency Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Haven, K. (2007). Story proof: The science behind the startling power of story. Greenwich, CT: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  13. Hay, J., & Couldry, N. (2011). Rethinking convergence/culture. Cultural Studies, 25(4–5), 473–486. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09502386.2011.600527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hopkins, N., Sylvester, A., & Tate, M. (2013). Motivations for BYOD: An investigation of the contents of the 21st century school bag. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2013), AIS Electronic Library (Aisle), Utrecht, The Netherlands, Number 183.Google Scholar
  15. Kenny, R. (2011). Beyond the Gutenberg parenthesis: Exploring new paradigms in media and learning. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 3(1), 32–47.Google Scholar
  16. Kopp, C. (1996). The Electromagnetic Bomb – A weapon of electrical mass destruction. Paper presented at Monash University, Australia. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235163256_The_Electromagnetic_Bomb_-_A_Weapon_of_Electrical_Mass_Destruction
  17. Langer, S. K. K. (1957). Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Manovich, L. (2014). Software is the message. Journal of Visual Culture, 13(1), 79–81.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412913509459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, & A. Soong (Eds.), Swee Kit (pp. 664–675). Singapore, Singapore: Centre for Educational Development, Nanyang Technology Conference.Google Scholar
  20. McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.Google Scholar
  21. McLuhan, M., & Parker, H. (1969). Counter blast. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.Google Scholar
  22. National Education Association. (n.d.). An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs”. Preparing 21st Century Students for a Global Society. Retrieved August 1, 2018 from http://www.nea.org/tools/52217.htm
  23. Office of Educational Technology. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 National education technology plan update. Retrieved November 4, 2018 from https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
  24. Piaget, J., & Cook, M. T. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Postman, N. (2000). The humanism of media ecology. Keynote Address delivered at the Inaugural Media Ecology Association Convention, New York, June 16–17, 2000.Google Scholar
  26. Reedy, D., & Galeon, C. (2017). Kurzweil claims that singularity will happen by 2045. Future Society. Retrieved from https://futurism.com/kurzweil-claims-that-the-singularity-will-happen-by-2045/
  27. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. I. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Rowley, J. (2000). Is higher education ready for knowledge management? International Journal of Educational Management, 14(7), 325–333.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540010378978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1963). The mathematical theory of communication. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  30. Strate, L.(2006). On media ecology as a field of study. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  31. Thigpen, K. (2014). Creating anytime, anywhere learning for all students: Key elements of a comprehensive digital infrastructure. Retrieved November 4, 2018 from http://all4ed.org/reports-factsheets/creating-anytime-anywhere-learning-for-all-students-key-elements-of-a-comprehensive-digital-infrastructure/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida Gulf Coast UniversityFort MyersUSA
  2. 2.University of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations