Advertisement

New Solutions, Future Possibilities

  • Jane SealeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to examine the extent to which the chapters contained within this book, and the work of the wider ICT, disability and Higher Education community, has developed new ways of thinking and framing the issue of poor ICT-related accessibility practice. In order to do this, five different ‘futures thinking’ lenses: present futures, questioning, probable futures, possible futures and preferable futures will be applied. This chapter will also consider whether adopting methods from the ‘future thinking’ field can resolve tensions in the ICT, disability and Higher Education field.

Keywords

ICT Disability Higher education Accessibility ‘Futures thinking’ 

References

  1. Barton, L. (2001). Disability, struggle and the politics of hope. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability, politics & the struggle for change (pp. 1–10). London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
  2. Bildungskommission NRW. (1995). Zukunft der Bildung – Schule der Zukunft: Denkschrift der Kommission beim Ministerpräsidenten des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. Berlin, Germany: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  3. Billingham, L. (2014). Improving academic library website accessibility for people with disabilities. Library Management, 35(8/9), 565–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, A. (2012). Future secondary schools for diversity: Where are we now, and where could we be? PhD thesis, Exeter University, Exeter, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Burgstahler, S. E. (Ed.). (2015). Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chacón-Medina, A., Chacón-López, H., López-Justicia, M. D., & Fernández-Jiménez, C. (2013). Dificultades en la Accesibilidad Web de las Universidades Españolas de acuerdo a la Norma WCAG 2.0. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 36(4), e025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Espadinha, C., Pereira, L. M., da Silva, F. M., & Lopes, J. B. (2011). Accessibility of Portuguese public universities’ sites. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(6), 475–485.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.498554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Facer, K. (2009). Educational, social and technological futures: A report from the beyond current horizons programme. London: DCSF & Futurelab.Google Scholar
  9. Iseri, E. I., Uyar, K., & Ilhan, U. (2017). The accessibility of Cyprus Islands’ higher education institutions websites. Procedia Computer Science, 120, 967–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ismailova, R., & Kimsanova, G. (2017). Universities of the Kyrgyz Republic on the Web: Accessibility and usability. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16, 1017–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kent, M., Ellis, K., Latter, N., & Peaty, G. (2018). The case for captioned lectures in Australian higher education. Tech Trends, 62(2), 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kimmons, R. (2017). Open to all? Nationwide evaluation of high-priority web accessibility considerations among higher education web-sites. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, 434–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Laitano, M. I. (2015). Accesibilidad web en el espacio universitario público argentino. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 38(1), e079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marien, M. (2002). Futures studies in the 21st century: A reality based view. Futures, 34(3), 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ontario Royal Commission on Learning. (1994). For the love of learning. Toronto, ON: Publications Ontario.Google Scholar
  16. Peters, S. (2010). The heterodoxy of student voice: Challenges to identity in the sociology of disability and education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(5), 591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Seale, J. (2018, March). Making higher education more accessible to disabled students: Do we need new technologies or new technology practices. Discussion paper for Ed-ICT Leverhulme International Network Symposium Tel Aviv. Resource document. Ed-ICT. http://ed-ict.com/workshops/tel-aviv/programme/
  18. Seale, J. K. (2006). E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility research and practice (1st ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seale, J. K. (2014). E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility research and practice (2nd ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. University of Washington. (2017). Symposium one: Effective models, frameworks, and approaches. Proceedings from the Ed-ICT International Network: Disabled students, ICT, post-compulsory education & employment: In search of new solutions. Resource document. Ed-ICT. http://ed-ict.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Symposium-Effective_models_frameworks_and_approaches_0.pdf
  21. Wright-Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Wellness, Education and Language StudiesThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations