New Designs or New Practices? Multiple Perspectives on the ICT and Accessibility Conundrum
There is considerable evidence to suggest that Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) can make a positive contribution to students’ experiences in higher education. Students with disabilities therefore have a positive outlook and attitude to ICT. Despite all these positive things, the ICT, disability, and higher education community have been wrestling with what they consider to be a massive question: is the design of ICT good enough? In particular, a certain section of the community believes that as long as specialist, assistive technologies exist, design practices will have failed. This chapter will explore, from multiple perspectives, a different argument that the eradication of specialist technologies is not necessarily required to improve ICT design.
KeywordsICT Assistive technologies Disability Higher education Accessibility Design
- Abou-Zahra, S., Brewer, J., & Cooper, M. (2017). Web Standards to Enable an Accessible and Inclusive Internet of Things (IoT). Proceedings of the 14th Web for All Conference, W4A 2017. Resource document. ACM and MIT. https://www.smartcitieslibrary.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Web-Standards-to-Enable-an-Accessible-and-Inclusive-Internet-of-Things.pdf
- Cooper, M., Sloan, D., Kelly, B., & Lewthwaite, S. (2012). A challenge to web accessibility metrics and guidelines: putting people and processes first. Paper presented at W4A 2012: 9th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility. Lyon, 16/04/12–18/04/12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207016.2207028.
- Coughlan, T., & Lister, K. (2018). The accessibility of administrative processes: Assessing the impacts on students in higher education. Proceedings of the 15th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (Web4All 2018). ACM Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Coughlan, T., Pitt, R., & McAndrew, P. (2013). Building open bridges: Collaborative remixing and reuse of open educational resources across organizations. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 991–1000). ACM Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Coughlan, T., Ullmann, T. D., & Lister, K. (2017). Understanding accessibility as a process through the analysis of feedback from disabled students. W4A ’17 Proceedings of the 14th Web for All Conference on The Future of Accessible Work, article no. 14. ACM Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Creative Commons. (2016). What is OER? Resource document. Creative Commons. https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/What_is_OER%3F
- Dahan, O., Melzer, Y., & Hadas-Lidor, N. (2013). Forum of Managers of Support Centers for students with learning disabilities. Journal for Educational Initiatives in the Training of Teachers, 8 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
- Heiman, T., Fichten, C. S., Olenik-Shemesh, D., Keshet, N. S., & Jorgensen, M. (2017). Access and perceived ICT usability among students with disabilities attending higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2727–2740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9623-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heiman, T., Olenik-Shemesh, D., Kaspi-Tsahor, D., & Regev-Nevo, M. (2018, March). In search of new designs. Proceedings of the Ed-ICT International Network Israel Symposium. Resource document. Ed-ICT. http://ed-ict.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/ProceedingsEd-ICTIsraelSymposium.pdf
- Lazar, J., Jaeger, P. T., Olalere, A., Algarne, M., Augustine, Z., Brown, C., et al. (2012). Still up in the air: Government regulation of airline websites and continuing price inequality for persons with disabilities online. Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 240–245). ACM Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Lazar, J., Olalere, A., & Wentz, B. (2012). Investigating the accessibility and usability of job application web sites for blind users. Journal of Usability Studies, 7(2), 68–87.Google Scholar
- Meir, I. (2018). Open your eyes: How technology improves the lives of the blind and visually impaired. Presented at the 3rd Ed-ICT International Network Israel Symposium: In Search of New Designs. Tel Aviv, Israel. http://ed-ict.com/workshops/tel-aviv/programme/. Accessed 26 Sep 2019.
- Rodman, E. (2018). See for yourself: A camera for blind and visually impaired individuals. Presented at the 3rd Ed-ICT International Network Israel Symposium: In Search of New Designs. Tel Aviv, Israel. http://ed-ict.com/workshops/tel-aviv/programme/. Accessed 26 Sep 2019.
- Seale, J. K. (2014). E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility research and practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Shinohara, K., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2011). In the shadow of misperception: Assistive technology uses and social interactions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 705–714). ACM Press: New York.Google Scholar
- UNESCO. (n.d.). Open Education Resources (OER). Resource document. UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer
- Vanderheiden, G. C. (2008). Ubiquitous accessibility, common technology core, and micro assistive technology: Commentary on “computers and people with disabilities”. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 1(2), 10.Google Scholar
- Zeltzer-Fallah, H. (2018, March). Assistive technology – From trying to doing. Presented at the 3rd Ed-ICT International Network Israel Symposium: In Search of New Designs. Tel Aviv, Israel. http://ed-ict.com/workshops/tel-aviv/programme/. Accessed 26 Sep 2019.