Advertisement

Balancing Cryptoassets and Gold: A Weighted-Risk-Contribution Index for the Alternative Asset Space

  • Aikaterini KoutsouriEmail author
  • Francesco Poli
  • Elise Alfieri
  • Michael Petch
  • Walter Distaso
  • William J. Knottenbelt
Conference paper
  • 10 Downloads
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

Bitcoin is foremost amongst the emerging asset class known as cryptoassets. Two noteworthy characteristics of the returns of non-stablecoin cryptoassets are their high volatility, which brings with it a high level of risk, and their high intraclass correlation, which limits the benefits that can be had by diversifying across multiple cryptoassets. Yet cryptoassets exhibit no correlation with gold, a highly-liquid yet scarce asset which has proved to function as a safe haven during crises affecting traditional financial systems. As exemplified by Shannon’s Demon, a lack of correlation between assets opens the door to principled risk control through so-called volatility harvesting involving periodic rebalancing. In this paper we propose an index which combines a basket of five cryptoassets with an investment in gold in a way that aims to improve the risk profile of the resulting portfolio while preserving its independence from mainstream financial asset classes such as stocks, bonds and fiat currencies. We generalise the theory of Equal Risk Contribution to allow for weighting according to a desired level of contribution to volatility. We find a crypto–gold weighting based on Weighted Risk Contribution to be historically more effective in terms of Sharpe Ratio than several alternative asset allocation strategies including Shannon’s Demon. Within the crypto-basket, whose constituents are selected and rebalanced monthly, we find an Equal Weighting scheme to be more effective in terms of the same metric than a market capitalisation weighting.

Keywords

Cryptoassets Index Volatility Rebalancing premium Risk management Asset allocation Equal risk contribution Weighted risk contribution Bitcoin Gold 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Imperial College of London gratefully acknowledges the support given mutually by CoinShares and Elwood Capital Management. Their funding provides Imperial with the support needed to conduct the research found within this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Baur, D.G., Dimpfl, T., Kuck, K.: Bitcoin, gold and the US dollar—a replication and extension. Financ. Res. Lett. 25, 103–110 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloomberg: Index methodology: bloomberg galaxy crypto index. Index Methodology (2019)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Booth, D., Fama, E.: Diversification returns and asset contributions. Financ. Anal. J. 48(3), 26–32 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouchey, P., Nemtchinov, V., Paulsen, A., Stein, D.: Volatility harvesting: why does diversifying and rebalancing create portfolio growth? J. Wealth Manag. 15(2), 26–35 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bredin, D., Conlon, T., Poti, V.: Does gold glitter in the long-run? Gold as a hedge and safe haven across time and investment horizon. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 41, 320–328 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burniske, C., Tatar, J.: Cryptoassets: The Innovative Investor’s Guide to Bitcoin and Beyond, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    CRYPTO20: the first tokenized cryptocurrency index fund. White Paper, October 2017Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Demiguel, V., Garlappi, L., Uppal, R.: Optimal versus naive diversification: how inefficient is the 1/n portfolio strategy? Rev. Financ. Stud. 22(05) (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dubikovsky, V., Susinno, G.: Demystifying rebalancing premium and extending portfolio theory in the process (2015).  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2927791
  10. 10.
    Dyhrberg, A.: Hedging capabilities of bitcoin. Is it the virtual gold? Financ. Res. Lett. 16(C), 139–144 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Treasury, H.M.: Financial conduct authority, Bank of England. Cryptoassets Task Force: Final Report, October (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hood, M., Malik, F.: Is gold the best hedge and a safe haven under changing stock market volatility? Rev. Financ. Econ. 22(2), 47–52 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maillard, S., Roncalli, T., Teiletche, J.: On the properties of equally-weighted risk contributions portfolios (2008).  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1271972
  14. 14.
    MV Index Solutions: MVIS CryptoCompare Digital Assets 5 Index. Index Factsheet (March 2019)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poundstone, W.: Fortune’s Formula. Hill and Wang (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rickards, J.: The New Case for Gold. Portfolio/Penguin Random House, UK (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Security and exchange Commission: virtual currencies: the oversight role of the U.S. securities and exchange Commission and the U.S. Commodity futures trading Commission. Report, February (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shu, J.J., Wang, Q.W.: Beyond Parrondo’s paradox. Scientific Reports 4, 4244 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stein, D., Nemtchinov, V., Pittman, S.: Diversifying and rebalancing emerging market countries. J. Wealth Manag. 11(4), 79–88 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    The law Library of Congress: regulation of cryptocurrency in selected jurisdictions. Report, June (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trimborn, S., Härdle, W.K.: CRIX an index for cryptocurrencies. J. Empir. Financ. 49, 107–122 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aikaterini Koutsouri
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francesco Poli
    • 2
  • Elise Alfieri
    • 3
  • Michael Petch
    • 4
  • Walter Distaso
    • 2
  • William J. Knottenbelt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ComputingImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of FinanceImperial College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.University Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance
  4. 4.CoinShares, Octagon PointLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations