Using Ontology and Context-Awareness for Business Process Modelling: An Overview

  • Jamal El BouroumiEmail author
  • Hatim GuermahEmail author
  • Mahmoud NassarEmail author
  • Abdelaziz KriouileEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems book series (LAIS, volume 7)


In recent years, several approaches have been proposed for modeling business process, with the emergence of Context-Awareness and semantic web, especially Ontologies. Researchers and practitioners had attempted to integrate them into Business Process Modeling. In this paper, we present, on the one hand, some classical approaches for BPM, particularly approaches that integrate Context and others that integrate Ontologies into BPM. On the other hand, we analyze their main characteristics through a comparative analysis based on a series of criteria. The purpose of this survey is to provide a support for a new proposal.


Business Process Modeling Ontology Context-Awareness 


  1. 1.
    Schilit, B.N., Theimer, M.M.: Disseminating active map information to mobile hosts. IEEE Netw. 8(5), 22–32 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, G., Kotzet, D., et al.: A survey of context-aware mobile computing research. Rapport technique, Technical Report TR2000-381, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dey, A., Abowd, G., Brown, P., Davies, N., Smith, M., Steggles, P.: Towards a better understanding of context and contextawareness. In: Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 304–307. Springer (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dey, A.K.: Supporting the construction of context-aware applications. In: Dagstuhl Seminar on Ubiquitous Computing, Dagsthul, Germany (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiaohang, W.: The context gateway: a pervasive computing infrastructure for context aware services, Technical report, National University of Singapore (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guarino, N.: Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 43(5/6), 625–640 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menzel, C., Mayer, R.J.: The IDEF family of languages (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    OMG: Business Process Modeling Notation.
  10. 10.
    Michael, G., Craig, S.: Process specification language (PSL): results of the first pilot implementation. In: Proceedings of IMECE: International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, pp 1–10 (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rospocher, M., Ghidini, C., Serafini, L.: An ontology for the Business Process Modelling Notation, FOIS (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Nicola, A., Lezoche, M., Missikoff, M.: An Ontological Approach to Business Process Modeling, pp. 1794–1813 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saidani, O., Rolland, C., Nurcan, S.: Towards a Generic Context Model for BPM (2015).
  14. 14.
    Yousfi, A., Bauer, C., Saidi, R., Dey, A.K.: uBPMN: a BPMN extension for modeling ubiquitous business processes. Inf. Softw. Technol. 74, 55–68 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, X.H., Gu, T., Zhang, D.Q., Pung, H.K.: Ontology based context modeling and reasoning using OWL. In: Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, pp. 18–22 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, J., Jiang, J.: Research on Flexible Management of Business Process. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 308, 804–811 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Santoro, F., Baião, F., Revoredo, K., Nunes, V.: Modeling and using context in business process management: a research agenda. Modélisation et utilisation du contexte 17 (2017).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IMS Team, ADMIR LabENSIAS RabatRabatMorocco

Personalised recommendations