Advertisement

A Transparent Referendum Protocol with Immutable Proceedings and Verifiable Outcome for Trustless Networks

  • Maximilian SchiedermeierEmail author
  • Omar Hasan
  • Lionel Brunie
  • Tobias Mayer
  • Harald Kosch
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 881)

Abstract

High voter turnout in elections and referendums is very desirable in order to ensure a robust democracy. Secure electronic voting is a vision for the future of elections and referendums. Such a system can counteract factors that hinder strong voter turnout such as the requirement of physical presence during limited hours at polling stations. However, this vision brings transparency and confidentiality requirements that render the design of such solutions challenging. Specifically, the counting must be implemented in a reproducible way and the ballots of individual voters must remain concealed. In this paper, we propose and evaluate a referendum protocol that ensures transparency, confidentiality and integrity, in trustless networks. The protocol is built by combining Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC) and Distributed Ledger or Blockchain technology. The persistence and immutability of the protocol communication allows verifiability of the referendum outcome on the client side. Voters therefore do not need to trust in third parties. We provide a formal description and conduct a thorough security evaluation of our proposal.

Keywords

E-Voting Trustless networks Political networks Transparency Unlinkability Blockchain 

References

  1. 1.
    Ayed, A.B.: A conceptual secure blockchain-based electronic voting system. Int. J. Network Secur. Appl. (IJNSA) 9(3), 1–9 (2017)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benaloh, J.C.: Secret sharing homomorphisms: keeping shares of a secret secret (Extended Abstract). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). LNCS, vol. 263, pp. 251–260 (1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Bursuc, S., Dragan, C., Kremer, S., Inria Nancy - Grand Est: HAL Id: hal-02099434 Private votes on untrusted platforms: models, attacks and provable scheme (2019) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clarkson, M.R., Myers, A.C.: Civitas: toward a secure voting system civitas system 7875 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cortier, V., Gaudry, P., Glondu, S.: Belenios: a simple private and verifiable electronic voting system to cite this version: HAL Id: hal-02066930 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diaz, C., Kosta, E., Dekeyser, H., Kohlweiss, M., Nigusse, G.: Privacy preserving electronic petitions. Identity Inf. Soc. 1, 203–219 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, K., James, J., Kim, H.: Electronic Voting Service Using Block-Chain 11, 2 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, Y., Susilo, W., Yang, G., Yu, Y., Liu, D., Guizani, M.: A Blockchain-based Self-tallying Voting Scheme in Decentralized IoT (2019)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schiedermeier, M., Hasan, O., Mayer, T., Brunie, L., Kosch, H.: Technical report: A transparent referendum protocol with immutable proceedings and verifiable outcome for trustless networks pp. 1–14, 3 figures (2019). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.06462.pdf
  11. 11.
    Springall, D., Finkenauer, T., Durumeric, Z., Kitcat, J., Hursti, H., Macalpine, M., Halderman, J.A.: Security Analysis of the Estonian Internet Voting System, pp. 703–715, May 2014Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zyskind, G.: Enigma: Decentralized Computation Platform with Guaranteed Privacy, pp. 1–14 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zyskind, G., Nathan, O., Pentland, A.S.: Decentralizing privacy: using blockchain to protect personal data. In: Proceedings - 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops, SPW 2015, pp. 180–184 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maximilian Schiedermeier
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Omar Hasan
    • 2
  • Lionel Brunie
    • 2
  • Tobias Mayer
    • 2
    • 3
  • Harald Kosch
    • 4
  1. 1.DISLMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada
  2. 2.INSA Lyon (LIRIS)VilleurbanneFrance
  3. 3.Verimi GmbHBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Universität PassauPassauGermany

Personalised recommendations