Advertisement

Toward a Smart Vulnerability Assessment Tool: Case of Project Management in Automotive Industries

  • Tarik ElamraniEmail author
  • Mustapha Ouardouz
  • Abdessamad Bernoussi
  • Mina Amharref
Conference paper
  • 26 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1104)

Abstract

The projects risk management system plays a key role in the sustainability of the company’s operational and managerial functions. Indeed, the main concern of project managers is to identify the vulnerable processes that generate disruptions to the progress of a project. This article recalls previous research work on our qualitative model named “H.I.K” concept, which deals with the three operating factors (Human, Information, and Knowledge). Thus, the latter are fundamental elements to assess any development of a new project may be contaminated by weakness links to different processes in a project management system, as in the case of international companies in the industrial context in Morocco. The basic question that arises is then, how to protect our managerial system from the major risks that are connected to the lack of evaluation or ignorance of the factors of the HIK model? We consider, firstly, a qualitative methodology in order to highlight a qualitative assessment of the elementary and global factors of our concept. Then, we built a smart tool model fitting into the vulnerability modelling approach using the qualitative parameterization of the studied factors. The tool was implemented through experimental studies in a Moroccan automotive industrial environment.

Keywords

Project management Risk Process Vulnerability Concept H.I.K 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by MESRSFC and CNRST (Morocco) under the project PPR2-OGI-Env, reference PPR2/2016/79.

References

  1. 1.
    Elamrani, T., Mustapha, O., Mina, A., Abdessamad, B.: Towards a tool for modeling the vulnerability of processes in project management in an industrial context. In: 2018 International Colloquium on Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA), pp. 164–169. IEEE, April 2018Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leone, F., Vinet, F.: La vulnérabilité, un concept fondamental au cœur des méthodes d’évaluation des risques naturels. la «Vulnérabilité des sociétés et territoires face aux menaces naturelles», Ouvrage collectif sous la direction de Leone F. et Vinet F., Géorisques, 4 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Provitolo, D.: Modélisation et simulation de catastrophe urbaine: le couplage de l’aléa et de la vulnérabilité. In:  Prévention des risques naturels, vol. 400, pp. 232–268, January 2003Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rozel, B.: La sécurisation des infrastructures critiques: recherche d’une méthodologie d’identification des vulnérabilités et modélisation des interdépendances. Thèse de doctorat. Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble-INPG (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    El Amrani, T., Amharref, M., Ouardouz, M., Bernoussi, A.: Risk management culture: reality and stakes, case of enterprises of Tangier-Tetouan-Al Hoceima region in Morocco. Moroc. J. Entrepreneurship Innov. Manage. 3(2), 58–76 (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guillemette, F.: L’approche de la Grounded Theory; pour innover. Recherches Qualitatives 26(1), 32–50 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fournillon, A., Arfib, B., Borgomano, J.: Estimation de la fonctionnalité du karst à partir des enregistrements CTD des sources: application à la paramétrisation de la vulnérabilité des aquifèresGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tarik Elamrani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mustapha Ouardouz
    • 1
  • Abdessamad Bernoussi
    • 1
  • Mina Amharref
    • 1
  1. 1.GAT, UAE-FSTTangierMorocco

Personalised recommendations