Advertisement

On the Educational Legacies of Jonathan M. Borwein

  • Naomi Simone Borwein
  • Judy-anne Heather OsbornEmail author
Conference paper
  • 48 Downloads
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 313)

Abstract

This chapter describes possible legacies in mathematical culture and education of the work and influence of Jonathan M. Borwein. Three lenses are applied: views expressed by members of the community in a panel session on “Maths, Education, Research and Culture” at the Jonathan M Borwein Commemorative Conference, September 2017; scholarship of schisms, divisions and disciplinarity; and Jonathan’s own words describing his practice of experimental mathematics and a philosophy of mathematical humanism. His work has evident potential for lasting transformational effect for the good of mathematics education, which emerges from each of our three different lenses. This potential is complex and rich. Jonathan’s defining impact on experimental mathematics as a research approach is entwined with his view of experimental mathematics as a teaching methodology, and provides the ground for one such legacy. In both research and educational uses of experimental “mathodology”, Jonathan’s aim was the creation of insight and intuition, and in this context his work and writing draws our attention to the significance of tools in enabling and extending human capacity. Another facet of legacy is the spanning of math/education schisms that is exemplified by Jonathan as an interdisciplinary practitioner whose work was influenced by his early love of history and his profound appreciation of music, art and philosophy. Jonathan’s writing extended beyond mathematics into various areas including educational scholarship and the philosophy of mathematics. His role as a public intellectual fostered another potential legacy: modelling a newly vigorous stewardship of mathematics by the collective custodians of the discipline.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank CARMA and our co-organisers in the Jonathan Borwein Commemorative Conference (JBCC). Thanks to the many JBCC participants who gave their permission to be anonymously quoted. And thank you to Jon for a lifetime of boundary-breaking research and pedagogical exploration.

References

  1. 1.
    Abbott, M.L., Ferriso, B., Smith, K., Trzyna, T.: Winning the Math Wars: No Teacher Left Behind. University of Washington Press, Seattle (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Annett, C.: Girls and Women in Sciences, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. In: HillNotes: Research and Analysis from Canada’s Library of Parliament by Clare Annett, Library of Parliament (2018). https://hillnotes.ca/2017/10/11/girls-and-women-in-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics/. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  3. 3.
    Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority.: Cross Curriculum Priorities (2018). Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/cross-curriculum-priorities/. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  4. 4.
    Bailey, D.H., Borwein, J.M.: Experimental mathematics: examples, methods and implications. Not. AMS 52(5), 502–513 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bailey, D.H.: Jonathan Borwein dies at 65. In: Math Drudge: Two Mathematicians Contemplate the Cosmos (2016). http://experimentalmath.info/blog/2016/08/jonathan-borwein-dies-at-65/. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  6. 6.
    Bailey, D.H., Borwein, J.M.: Mathematics by Experiment: Plausible Reasoning in the 21st Century. A K Peters/CRC Press, Wellesley and Baton Rouge (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bailey, D.H., Borwein, J.M., Martin, U., Salvy, B., Taufer, M.: Opportunities and Challenges in 21st Century Experimental Mathematical Computation: ICERM Workshop Report (2014). Retrieved from https://www.davidhbailey.com/dhbpapers/ICERM-2014.pdf. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  8. 8.
    Becher, T., Trowler, P.: Academic Territories and Terrains, 2nd edn. Open University Press/SRHE, Buckingham (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bollobas, B., Littlewood, J.E.: Littlewood’s Miscellany. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, UK (1986)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borwein, J.M.: Actually: Teaching and Research with Collaboration Tools and Technology (2011). https://carma.newcastle.edu.au/jon/aces11.pdf and https://www.austms.org.au/Publ/Gazette/2011/Jul11/CommsALTC.pdf. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  11. 11.
    Borwein, J.M.: Aesthetics for the working mathematician. In: Sinclair, N., Pimm, D., Higginson, W. (eds.) Mathematics and the Aesthetic. CMS Books in Mathematics. Springer, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borwein, J.M.: The experimental mathematician: the pleasure of discovery and the role of proof. Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn. 10, 75–108 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Borwein, J.: Experimental mathematics leads to new insights. https://carma.newcastle.edu.au/jon/JMBinnov.pdf. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  14. 14.
    Borwein, J.M.: The life of modern homo habilis mathematicus: experimental computation and visual theorems. In: Monaghan, J., Trouche, L., Borwein, J.M. (eds.) Tools and Mathematics: Instruments for Learning. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borwein, J.M.: Commemorative Conference, 2016. https://carma.newcastle.edu.au/meetings/jbcc/. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  16. 16.
    Borwein, J.M., Bailey, D.H.: Why mathematics is beautiful and why it matters. In: Huffington Post (2017). https://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-h-bailey/why-mathematics-matters_b_4794617.html. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  17. 17.
    Borwein, J., Bailey, D., Girgensohn, R.: Experimentation in Mathematics: Computational Paths to Discovery. CRC Press and Taylor and Francis Group, FL (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borwein, J.M., Borowski, E.: Collins Dictionary of Mathematics. HarperCollins, UK (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Borwein J., Borwein P.: Implications of experimental mathematics for the philosophy of mathematics. In: Experimental and Computational Mathematics: Selected Writings. Perfectly Scientific Press, Portland, Oregon (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borwein, J.M., Borwein, P.B., Braham, S., Corless, R., Jorgenson, L.: Digitally activated mathematics for a brave new world wide web. Educ. Res. Perspect. 23(2), 28–47 (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Borwein, J.M., Jungic, V.: Organic mathematics: then and now. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 59(3) (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Borwein, J.M.: Osborn, J: review of ‘loving and hating mathematics’ by Reuben Hersh and Vera John-Steiner. Math. Intell. 33, 63–69 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Borwein, J.M., Skerritt, M.P.: An Introduction to Modern Mathematical Computing: With Mathematica. Springer, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bharath, S., Törner, G.: Political union/mathematical education disunion: building bridges in European didactic traditions. In: English, L. et al. (ed.) Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brown, M., Brown, P., Bibby, T.: I would rather die: reasons given by 16-year-olds for not continuing their study of mathematics. Res. Math. Educ. 10, 3–18 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Burns, M. Illustrated by Weston, M.: The I Hate Mathematics! The Yolla Bolly Press, Covelo, California (1975)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buxton, L.: Math Panic. The University of Michigan, Heinemann (1991)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Canadian Coast to Coast Seminar Series C2C. http://c2c.irmacs.sfu.ca. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  29. 29.
    Carroll, L.: Mathematical Recreations of Lewis Carroll: Pillow Problems and a Tangled Tale. Dover Publications, Mineola, c1893 (1958)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Center for Experimental and Constructive Mathematics (CECM). http://www.cecm.sfu.ca. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  31. 31.
    Clark, B.R.: Academic culture. Yale University, New Haven, Higher Education Research Group, Institution for Social and Policy Studies (1980)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Collini, S.: “Introduction” to Two Cultures by C.P. Snow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Computer Assisted Research Mathematics and its Applications (CARMA). https://carma.newcastle.edu.au. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  34. 34.
    Dalhousie University D-Drive Document Server. http://roar.eprints.org/281/. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  35. 35.
    Davidson, C.: Humanities and technology in the Information age. In: Frodeman, R., Klein, J.T., Pacheco, R.C.D.S. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, pp. 206–219. Oxford University Press, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Davis, B., The Spatial Reasoning Study Group.: Spatial Reasoning in the Early Years: Principles, Assertions, and Speculations. Routledge, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Davis, P., Hersh, R., Marchisotto, E.A.: The Mathematical Experience, Study Edition. Modern Birkhäser Classics, Boston (2012)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Deegan, M., McCarty, W. (eds.): Collaborative Research in the Digital Humanities. Ashgate Publishing Limited and Ashgate Publishing Company, England and USA (2012)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Devlin, K., Borwein, J.M.: The Computer as Crucible. A K Peters/CRC Press, Wellesley and Baton Rouge (2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dissanayake, E.: Homo Aestheticus. Free Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., Looi, C. Y.: Mathematics anxiety: what have we learned in 60 years? In: Frontiers in Psychology 7(42) (2016). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508. Accessed 17 Jan 2019
  42. 42.
    Dreger, R.M., Aiken, L.R.: The identification of number anxiety in a college population. J. Educ. Psychol. 48(6), 344–351 (1957).  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dubiel, M., Heinrich, K.: https://cms.math.ca/Education/MallMath/. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  44. 44.
    Dweck, C.: Is Math a gift: beliefs that put females at risk. In: Ceci, S.J., Williams, W. (eds.) Why Aren’t More Women in Science? Top Researchers Debate the Evidence. American Psychological Association, Washington (2006)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Engel, S., Halvorson, D.: Neoliberalism, massification and teaching transformative politics and international relations. Aust. J. Polit. Sci. 51(3), 546–554 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2016.1200706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Enzensberger, H.M.: Drawbridge Up. AK Peters, Natick (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Freudenthal, H.: Mathematics as an Educational Task. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland (1973)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Frodeman, R., Klein, J.T., Pacheco, R.C.D.S. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hanna, G.: Reaching gender equity in mathematics education. Educ. Forum 67(3), 204–214 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720309335034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hanna, G., de Villiers, M. (eds.): Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education: The 19th ICMI Study. International Commission on Mathematical Instruction. Springer, Dordrecht (2012)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hardy, G.H. [1940].: A Mathematician’s Apology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004). ISBN 978-0-521-42706-7Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hersh, R.: What is Mathematics, Really?. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hersh, R., John-Steiner, V.: Loving and Hating Mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hill, C., Corbett, C., and St. Rose., A.: Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. American Association of University Women, 1111 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036 (2010)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Holt, J.: How Children Fail. Pitman Publishing, Great Britain (1965)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hoyles, C.: Changing the way people think, move and feel mathematically: the contribution of digital technologies. Panel (2016). https://carma.newcastle.edu.au/meetings/tools/#panel. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  57. 57.
    Hoyles, C, Noss, R.: Visions for mathematical learning: the inspirational legacy of Seymour Papert (1928–2016). Educ. Forum, 34–36 (2017)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Joseph, G.G.: The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics, 3rd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jurdak, M., de Freitas, R.V.E., Gates, P., Kollosche, D.: Social and Political Dimensions of Mathematics Education: Current Thinking. Springer Open, Switzerland (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kaiser, G. (Series ed.): ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Springer, Switzerland (2013). https://www.springer.com/series/14352. Accessed 28 Sep 2018
  61. 61.
    Kellar, M., MacKay, B., Zhang, R., Watters, C., Kaufman, D., Borwein, J.: Dynamic Composition of Math Lessons. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. Digit. Contents Educ. 6(4), 100–111 (2003)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kuhn, T.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1962)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lakoff, G., Nũnez, R.E.: Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. Basic Books, New York (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Lave, J.: Cognition in Practice: Mind. Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ma, L.: Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics Teachers’ Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States. Routledge, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Maddy, P.: How applied mathematics became pure. Rev. Symb. Logic. 1(1), 16–41 (2008) . Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/818f/f8e2b8d7619ee23940be5b7111a2badebf5f.pdf
  67. 67.
    Maranto, C., Griffin, A.: The antecedents of a ‘chilly climate’ for women faculty in higher education. Hum. Relat. 64(2), 139–159 (2011). Retrieved from https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com.au/&httpsredir=1&article=1047&context=mgmt_fac
  68. 68.
    Monoghan, J., Trouche, L., Borwein, J.M.: Tools and Mathematics: Instruments for Learning. Springer, Cham (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Monroe, J.: Introduction: the shapes of fields. In: Writing and Revising the Disciplines, pp. 1–12. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (2002)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Mumford, D.: Preface. In: Enzensberger, H.M. (ed.) Drawbridge Up. AK Peters, Natick (1999)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Nealon, J.: Alterity Politics: Ethics and Performative Subjectivity. Duke University Press, Durham (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Raju, C.K.: Black thoughts matter: decolonized math, academic censorship, and the “Pythagorean” proposition. J. Black Stud. 48(3), 256–278 (2017)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Raju, C.K.: Decolonising math and science education (2011a). http://ckraju.net/papers/decolonisation-paper.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2019
  74. 74.
    Raju, C.K.: Math wars and the epistemic divide in mathematics. Centre for Computer Science, MCRP University, Gyantantra Parisar (2011b). http://www.hbcse.tifr.res.in/episteme/episteme-1/themes/ckraju_finalpaper. Accessed 18 Jan 2019
  75. 75.
    Rhoten, D., Pfirman, S.: Women in interdisiciplinary science: exploring preferences and consequences. Res. Policy 36, 56–75 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Rockwell, G.: Crowdsourcing the humanities: social research and collaboration. In: Deegan, M., McCarty, W. (eds.) Collaborative Research in the Digital Humanities, pp. 135–154. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham (2012)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rose, M.: Healing the academic-vocational schism. The Higher Times Chronicle, 10 Sep 2012Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sengupta-Irving, T.: Gender equity and mathematics education. In: Banks, J.A. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Diversity in Education. SAGE Publications, University of California, Irvine (2012)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Sinclair, N.: Mathematics and Beauty: Aesthetic Approaches to Teaching Children. Teachers College Press. Teacher’s College, Columbia University, New York and London (2006)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Snow, C.P.: The Two Cultures and a Second Look: An Expanded Version of the Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Stevenson, A., Waite, M. (eds.): Concise Oxford English Dictionary, Luxury edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Sullivan, P., Clarke, D.J., Clarke, D.M., Farrell, L., Gerrard, J.: Processes and priorities in planning mathematics teaching. Math. Educ. Res. J. 25, 457–480 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Swan, P.: I hate Mathematics (2004). https://www.mav.vic.edu.au/files/conferences/2004/Swan.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2019
  84. 84.
    Terras, M.: Being the other. In: Mccarty, W., Deegan, M. (eds.) Collaborative Research in the Digital Humanities, pp. 213–230. Ashgate, UK (2012)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Tobias, S. [(1978)].: Overcoming math anxiety. Norton paperback edn. W. W. Norton., New York (1993)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Trowler, P., Saunders, M., Bamber, V. (eds.): Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century: Rethinking the Significance of Discipline in Higher Education, 1st edn. Routledge, London (2012)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    UNESCO.: Cracking the Code: Girls’ and Women’s Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France (2017). http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0025/002534/253479E.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2019
  88. 88.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naomi Simone Borwein
    • 1
  • Judy-anne Heather Osborn
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  2. 2.School of Mathematical and Physical SciencesThe University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations