Advertisement

The SCORE in Europe: Measuring Effectiveness, Assisting Therapy

  • Peter Stratton
  • Alan Carr
  • Luigi Schepisi
Chapter
  • 33 Downloads
Part of the European Family Therapy Association Series book series (EFTAS)

Abstract

This chapter describes Clinical and Research Experiences Across Europe Using the SCORE as an Indicator of Family Functioning and is based on the symposium with that title in the International Systemic Research Conference, Heidelberg, 2017. The crucial importance of being able to report the outcomes of systemic couple and family therapies (SCFT) is discussed and some of the difficulties identified. Following an overview of the development and validation of the different versions of SCORE, the symposium and this chapter follow the timeline of the development and use of SCORE first in the UK and then during the decade of research in Ireland led by Alan Carr, followed by more recent studies in Poland, Portugal and Spain, and Italy (In addition to the authors, this chapter draws on the contributions to the SCORE symposium of Margarida Vilaça, Anna Paula Relvas, Roberto Pereira, Feliks Matusiak, Barbara Jozefik, and Daniele Paolini). We present wider studies of the uses of SCORE in Europe by the EFTA Research Committee as a project led by Peter Stratton and Luigi Schepisi. Finally, we review areas of potential in developments of SCORE measures, possible research projects, and use of SCORE in clinical interventions.

Keywords

SCORE Family assessment Systemic couple and family therapy Therapy outcomes Therapeutic uses of SCORE 

References

  1. Cahill, P., O’Reilly, K., Carr, A., Dooley, B., & Stratton, P. (2010). Validation of a 28-item version of the systemic clinical outcome and routine evaluation in an Irish context: The SCORE-28. Journal of Family Therapy., 32, 210–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cahill, P., O’Reilly, K., Carr, A., Dooley, B., & Stratton, P. (2013). Systemic clinical outcome and routine evaluation- 28 (SCORE-28). In C. Simmons & P. Lehmann (Eds.), Tools for strengths-based assessment and evaluation (pp. 447–450). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Carr, A., & Stratton, P. (2017). The score family assessment questionnaire: A decade of progress. Family Process, 56, 285–301.  https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassells, C., Carr, A., Forrest, M., Fry, J., Beirne, F., Casey, T., et al. (2015). Positive systemic practice: A controlled trial of family therapy for adolescent emotional and behavioral problems in Ireland. Journal of Family Therapy, 37, 429–449.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fay, D., Carr, A., O’Reilly, K., Cahill, P., Dooley, B., Guerin, S., & Stratton, P. (2013). Irish norms for the SCORE-15 and 28 from a national telephone survey. Journal of Family Therapy, 35, 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamilton, E., Carr, A., Cahill, P., Cassells, C., & Hartnett, D. (2015). Psychometric properties and responsiveness to change of 15- and 28-item versions of the SCORE: A family assessment questionnaire. Family Process, 54, 454–463.  https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hartnett, D., Carr, A., & Sexton, T. (2016). The effectiveness of Functional Family Therapy in reducing mental health risk and family adjustment difficulties in an Irish Context. Family Process, 55(2), 287–304.  https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jewell, T., Carr, A., Stratton, P., Lask, J., & Eisler, I. (2013). Development of a children’s version of the SCORE index of family function and change. Family Process, 52(4), 673–684.  https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12044CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jozefik, B., Matusiak, F., Wolska, M., & Ulasińska, R. (2015). Family therapy process—Works on the Polish version of SCORE-15 tool. Psychiatria Polska, www.psychiatriapolska.pl. doi: https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/42894
  10. Matusiak, F., Józefik, B., Wolska, M., Ulasińska, R., & Stratton, P. (submitted). A quantitative and qualitative analysis of changes in systemic family therapy: Results of the polish clinical version of the SCORE – 15 questionnaire. Psychiatria Polska.Google Scholar
  11. O’Hanrahan, K., Daly White, M., Carr, A., Cahill, P., Keenleyside, M., Fitzhenry, M., … Browne, S. (2017). Validation of 28 and 15 item versions of the SCORE family assessment questionnaire with adult mental health service users. Journal of Family Therapy, 39, 4–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Relvas, A. P., Vilaça, M., Rivas, G., & Pereira, R. (2015). SCORE-15: Datos portugueses y españoles. Communication presented at the III Iberian Congress of Family Therapy, Cáceres, Spain.Google Scholar
  13. Rivas, G., & Pereira, R. (2015). Validación de una escala de evaluación familiar: adaptación del score-15 con normas en español. III Congreso Ibérico de Terapia Familiar, Caceres.Google Scholar
  14. Stratton, P. (2008). Practitioner Research Network in Action: Constructing an outcome measure for therapy with relational systems. The Psychotherapist, 38, 15–16.Google Scholar
  15. Stratton, P. (2016). The evidence base of family therapy and systemic practice. Association for Family Therapy, UK. Online copy available at www.aft.org.uk
  16. Stratton, P., Bland, J., Janes, E., & Lask, J. (2010). Developing a practicable outcome measure for systemic family therapy: The SCORE. Journal of Family Therapy., 32, 232–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stratton, P., Lask, J., Bland, J., Nowotny, E., Evans, C., Singh, R., … Peppiatt, A. (2014). Validation of the SCORE-15 Index of Family Functioning and Change in detecting therapeutic improvement early in therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 3–19.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stratton, P., & Low, D. (2020) Culturally sensitive measures of systemic family therapy. In K. S. Wampler, M. Rastogi, & R. Singh, (Eds) Handbook of systemic family therapy (Vol. 4). Systemic family therapy and global health issues. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  19. Stratton, P., McGovern, M., Wetherell, A., & Farrington, C. (2006). Family therapy practitioners researching the reactions of practitioners to an outcome measure. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 27, 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stratton, P., Silver, E., Nascimento, N., McDonnell, L., Powell, G., & Nowotny, E. (2015). Couples and family therapy in the previous decade – What does the evidence tell us? Contemporary Family Therapy, 27, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-014-9314-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Teh, Y. Y., Lask, J., & Stratton, P. (2017). From family to relational SCORE-15: An alternative adult version of a systemic self-report measure for couples and LGB people. Journal of Family Therapy, 39, 21–40.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vilaca¸, M., Relvas, A. P., & Stratton, P. (2017). A Portuguese translation of the Systemic Clinical Outcome and Routine Evaluation (SCORE): The psychometric properties of the 15- and 28-item versions. Journal of Family Therapy, 40, 537–556.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vilaça, M., Stratton, P., Sousa, B., & Relvas, A. P. (2015). The 15-item systemic clinical outcome and routine evaluation (SCORE-15) scale: Portuguese Validation Studies. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18(E87), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wolpert, M. (2013). Uses and abuses of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): Potential iatrogenic impact of PROMs implementation and how it can be mitigated. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0509-1. Open access at Springerlink.com

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Stratton
    • 1
  • Alan Carr
    • 2
  • Luigi Schepisi
    • 3
  1. 1.Leeds Institute of Health Sciences (LIHS), University of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.School of Psychology, University College Dublin, and Clanwilliam Institute DublinDublinIreland
  3. 3.Centro di Studi e di Applicazione della Psicologia RelazionalePratoItaly

Personalised recommendations