Advertisement

Telemedicine and Telestroke

  • Kori S. ZachrisonEmail author
  • Juan Estrada
  • Lee H. Schwamm
Chapter
  • 38 Downloads
Part of the Current Clinical Neurology book series (CCNEU)

Abstract

Telemedicine is the use of audiovisual communication and computer systems to provide clinical care remotely. When used in the care of patients with stroke, this is referred to as telestroke. Telestroke networks connect patients in remote or under-resourced settings with centralized expertise in order to guide evaluation and treatment decisions. Telemedicine is used in the prehospital setting, in the emergency and acute setting, and in the inpatient setting to deliver care to stroke patients. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the use of telestroke. Telestroke guidelines have recently been developed, and recommendations have been made for the development of process and outcome measures to track telestroke network performance. Reimbursement and regulatory frameworks are continuing to adapt to this innovative but increasingly common modality of acute stroke care delivery.

Keywords

Telemedicine Acute stroke Systems of care Remote evaluation Audiovisual communication 

References

  1. 1.
    Levine SR, Gorman M. “Telestroke”: the application of telemedicine for stroke. Stroke. 1999;30(2):464–9.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.2.464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Demaerschalk BM, Berg J, Chong BW, et al. American Telemedicine Association: telestroke guidelines. Telemed e-Health. 2017;23(5):376–89.  https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McConnell KJ, Johnson LA, Arab N, Richards CF, Newgard CD, Edlund T. The on-call crisis: a statewide assessment of the costs of providing on-call specialist coverage. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(6):727–733.e18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.10.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rudkin SE, Langdorf MI, Oman JA, Kahn CA, White H, Anderson CL. The worsening of ED on-call coverage in California: 6-year trend. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27(7):785–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2008.06.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sanders JL, Raja AS, Hasegawa K, et al. Decline in consultant availability in Massachusetts emergency departments: 2005 to 2014. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;68(4):461–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.06.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adams RJ, Fisher M, Furlan AJ, del Zoppo G. Acute stroke treatment trials in the United States. Rethinking strategies for success. Stroke. 1995;26(12):2216–8.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.2.464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hess DC, Audebert HJ. The history and future of telestroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(6):340–50.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2013.86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zachrison KS, Hayden EM, Schwamm LH, et al. Characterizing New England emergency departments by telemedicine use. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(6):1055–60.  https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2017.8.34880.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pedragosa À, Alvarez-Sabín J, Rubiera M, et al. Impact of telemedicine on acute management of stroke patients undergoing endovascular procedures. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(5–6):436–42.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000345088.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Switzer JA, Hall CE, Close B, et al. A telestroke network enhances recruitment into acute stroke clinical trials. Stroke. 2010;41(3):566–9.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.566844.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Audebert HJ, Schenkel J, Heuschmann PU, Bogdahn U. Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria, Germany. neurology.thelancet.com. 2006;  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474.
  12. 12.
    Meyer B, Lyden P, Al-Khoury L, et al. Prospective reliability of the STRokE DOC wireless/site independent telemedicine system. Neurology. 2005;64:1058–60. http://n.neurology.org.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/content/neurology/64/6/1058.full.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shafqat S, Kvedar JC, Guanci MM, et al. Role for telemedicine in acute stroke. Feasibility and reliability of remote administration of the NIH stroke scale. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2141–5.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000091847.82140.9d.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang S, Lee SB, Pardue C, et al. Remote evaluation of acute ischemic stroke: reliability of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale via telestroke. Stroke. 2003;34(10):e188–91.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000091847.82140.9D.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meyer BC, Raman R, Chacon MR, Jensen M, Werner JD. Reliability of site-independent telemedicine when assessed by telemedicine-naive stroke practitioners.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2008.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schwamm LH, Holloway RG, Amarenco P, et al. A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2009;40(7):2616–34.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.192360.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gonzalez MA, Hanna N, Rodrigo ME, Satler LF, Waksman R. Reliability of prehospital real-time cellular video phone in assessing the simplified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in patients with acute stroke: a novel telemedicine technology. Stroke. 2011;42(6):1522–7.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.600296.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anderson ER, Smith B, Ido M, Frankel M. Remote assessment of stroke using the iPhone 4. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22(4):340–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.09.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Demaerschalk BM, Vegunta S, Vargas BB, Wu Q, Channer DD, Hentz JG. Reliability of real-time video smartphone for assessing National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores in acute stroke patients. Stroke. 2012;43(12):3271–7.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.669150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Puetz V, Bodechtel U, Gerber JC, et al. Reliability of brain CT evaluation by stroke neurologists in telemedicine. Neurology. 2013;80(4):332–8.  https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f07d0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Demaerschalk BM, Bobrow BJ, Raman R, et al. CT interpretation in a telestroke network: agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist. Stroke. 2012;43(11):3095–7.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.666255.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T, et al. Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(9):787–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70171-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Demaerschalk BM, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Meyer BC. Efficacy of telemedicine for stroke: pooled analysis of the stroke team remote evaluation using a digital observation camera (STRokE DOC) and STRokE DOC Arizona Telestroke Trials. Telemed e-Health. 2012;18:230–7.  https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schwamm LH, Rosenthal ES, Hirshberg A, et al. Virtual TeleStroke support for the emergency department evaluation of acute stroke. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(11):1193–7.  https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wiborg A, Widder B, Telemedicine in Stroke in Swabia Project. Teleneurology to improve stroke care in rural areas: the Telemedicine in Stroke in Swabia (TESS) Project. Stroke. 2003;34(12):2951–6.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000099125.30731.97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hess DC, Wang S, Hamilton W, et al. REACH: clinical feasibility of a rural telestroke network. Stroke. 2005;36(9):2018–20.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000177534.02969.e4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang S, Gross H, Lee SB, et al. Remote evaluation of acute ischemic stroke in rural community hospitals in Georgia. Stroke. 2004;35(7):1763–8.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000131858.63829.6e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Audebert HJ, Kukla C, Clarmann von Claranau S, et al. Telemedicine for safe and extended use of thrombolysis in stroke: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria. Stroke. 2005;36(2):287–91.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000153015.57892.66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sairanen T, Soinila S, Nikkanen M, et al. Two years of Finnish Telestroke: thrombolysis at spokes equal to that at the hub. Neurology. 2011;76(13):1145–52.  https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318212a8d4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sauser-Zachrison K, Shen E, Sangha N, et al. Safe and effective implementation of telestroke in a US community hospital setting. Perm J. 2016;20(4):11–5.  https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/15-217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kepplinger J, Barlinn K, Deckert S, Scheibe M, Bodechtel U, Schmitt J. Safety and efficacy of thrombolysis in telestroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2016;87(13):1344–51.  https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moreno A, Schwamm LH, Siddiqui KA, et al. Frequent hub-spoke contact is associated with improved spoke hospital performance: results from the Massachusetts General Hospital Telestroke Network. Telemed J E Health. 2017:tmj.2017.0252.;  https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Switzer JA, Hall C, Gross H, et al. A web-based telestroke system facilitates rapid treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients in rural emergency departments. J Emerg Med. 2009;36(1):12–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.06.041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Barlinn J, Gerber J, Barlinn K, et al. Acute endovascular treatment delivery to ischemic stroke patients transferred within a telestroke network: a retrospective observational study. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(5):502–9.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493016681018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Klingner CM, Brodoehl S, Funck L, et al. Transfer of patients in a telestroke network: what are the relevant factors for making this decision? Telemed e-Health. 2018;24(2):116–20.  https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yaghi S, Harik SI, Hinduja A, Bianchi N, Johnson DM, Keyrouz SG. Post t-PA transfer to hub improves outcome of moderate to severe ischemic stroke patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(7):396–9.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X15577531.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    LaMonte MP, Xiao Y, Hu PF, et al. Shortening time to stroke treatment using ambulance telemedicine: TeleBAT. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;13(4):148–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.03.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liman TG, Winter B, Waldschmidt C, et al. Telestroke ambulances in prehospital stroke management: concept and pilot feasibility study. Stroke. 2012;43(8):2086–90.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.657270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wu T-C, Nguyen C, Ankrom C, et al. Prehospital utility of rapid stroke evaluation using in-ambulance telemedicine: a pilot feasibility study. Stroke. 2014;45(8):2342–7.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005193.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wu T-C, Parker SA, Jagolino A, et al. Telemedicine can replace the neurologist on a mobile stroke unit. Stroke. 2017;48(2):493–6.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015363.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bowry R, Parker SA, Yamal J-M, et al. Time to decision and treatment with tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) using telemedicine versus an onboard neurologist on a mobile stroke unit. Stroke. 2018;49(6):1528–30.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020585.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Itrat A, Taqui A, Cerejo R, et al. Telemedicine in prehospital stroke evaluation and thrombolysis. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(2):162.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3849.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Taqui A, Cerejo R, Itrat A, et al. Reduction in time to treatment in prehospital telemedicine evaluation and thrombolysis. Neurology. 2017;88(14):1305–12.  https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003786.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schwab S, Vatankhah B, Kukla C, et al. Long-term outcome after thrombolysis in telemedical stroke care. Neurology. 2007;69(9):898–903.  https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000269671.08423.14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Audebert HJ, Schultes K, Tietz V, et al. Long-term effects of specialized stroke care with telemedicine support in community hospitals on behalf of the Telemedical Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS). Stroke. 2009;40(3):902–8.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.529255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wechsler LR, Demaerschalk BM, Schwamm LH, et al. Telemedicine quality and outcomes in stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017;48(1):e3–e25.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Switzer JA, Demaerschalk BM, Xie J, Fan L, Villa KF, Wu EQ. Cost-effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals’ perspectives. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(1):18–26.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nelson RE, Saltzman GM, Skalabrin EJ, Demaerschalk BM, Majersik JJ. The cost-effectiveness of telestroke in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2011;77(17):1590–8.  https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318234332d.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49(3):e46–e110.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kori S. Zachrison
    • 1
    Email author
  • Juan Estrada
    • 2
  • Lee H. Schwamm
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Emergency MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Neurology and Center for TeleHealthMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations