Advertisement

Continuous Predictive Model for Quality of Experience in Wireless Video Streaming

  • Wenjuan ShiEmail author
  • Jinqiu Pan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 302)

Abstract

Because of bandwidth and buffer limitation in wireless network, rebuffering events and bitrate drop often cause video impairments, e.g. compression artifacts and video stalling. Hence, these problems often make a loss of the quality of experience (QoE). For making a prediction about the impact of video impairments on QoE, a continuous predictive model for QoE in wireless video streaming is proposed. In this paper, the inputs are composed of three vectors that are the quality of video frame, rebuffering events state and human memory effect, and the output represents the predicted continuous QoE. We build the predictive model by a Hammerstein-Wiener model. Experimental results show that the proposed model can accurately make a prediction about continuous subjective QoE.

Keywords

Quality of experience (QoE) Continuous QoE Frame quality Rebuffering event Memory effect 

References

  1. 1.
    Ghadiyaram, D., Pan, J., Bovik, A.C.: A subjective and objective study of stalling events in mobile streaming videos. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 29(1), 183–197 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oyman, O., Singh, S.: Quality of experience for HTTP adaptive streaming services. IEEE Commun. Mag. 50(4), 20–27 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seufert, M., Egger, S., Slanina, M., et al.: A survey on quality of experience of HTTP adaptive streaming. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 17(1), 469–492 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 23009-1 Dynamics Adaptive Streaming Over HTTP (DASH) (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tavakoli, S., Brunnstrom, K., Gutierrez, J., et al.: Quality of experience of adaptive video streaming: investigation in service parameters and subjective quality assessment methodology. Sig. Process. Image Commun. 39, 432–443 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garcia, M.N., Simone, F.D., Tavakoli, S., et al.: Quality of experience and HTTP adaptive streaming: a review of subjective studies. In: 2014 Sixth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, Germany, pp. 141–146 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tavakoli, S., Egger, S., Seufert, M., et al.: Perceptual quality of HTTP adaptive streaming strategies: cross-experimental analysis of multi-laboratory and crowdsourced subjective studies. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 34(8), 2141–2153 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moorthy, A.K., Choi, L.K., Bovik, A.C., et al.: Video quality assessment on mobile devices: subjective, behavioral and objective studies. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Sig. Process. 6(6), 652–671 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bampis, C.G., Li, Z., Bovik, A.C.: Continuous prediction of streaming video QoE using dynamic networks. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 24(7), 1083–1087 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu, J., Lin, W., Shi, G.: Orientation selectivity based visual pattern for reduced-reference image quality assessment. Inf. Sci. 351, 18–29 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shi, W., Sun, Y., et al.: Spatial and temporal feature-based reduced reference quality assessment for rate-varing videos in wireless networks. Int. J. Pattern Recogn. Artif. Intell. (to appear)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghadiyaram, D., Pan, J., Bovik, A.C.: A time-varying subjective quality model for mobile streaming videos with stalling events. In: Applications of Digital Image Processing XXXVIII, pp. 1–8 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    LIVE-Netflix Mobile Video Quality Assessment Database. http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/LIVE_NFLXStudy/nflx_index.html
  14. 14.
    Berndt, D.J., Clifford, J.: Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In: AAAI 1994 Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Databases, New York, USA, pp. 359–370 (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hands, D.S., Avons, S.E.: Recency and duration neglect in subjective assessment of television picture quality. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 15(6), 639–657 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Greene, J., Prepscius, C., Levy, W.B.: Primacy versus recency in quantitative model activity is the critical distinction. Learn. Mem. 7(1), 48–57 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seshadrinathan, K., Bovik, A.C.: Temporal hysteresis model of time varying subjective video quality. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 1153–1156 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., et al.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E.P., Bovik, A.C.: Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In: Proceedings of Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, pp. 1398–1402 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Soundararajan, R., Bovik, A.C.: Video quality assessment by reduced reference spatio-temporal entropic differencing. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 23(4), 684–694 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mittal, A., Soundararajan, R., Bovik, A.C.: Making a “completely blind” image quality analyzer. IEEE Sig. Process. Lett. 20(3), 209–212 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shi, W., Sun, Y., Pan, J.: Continuous prediction for quality of experience in wireless video streaming. IEEE Access (2019)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shi, W., Sun, Y., Li, S., Cao, Q., Wang, B.: Spatial and temporal feature-based reduced reference quality assessment for rate-varying videos in wireless networks. Int. J. Pattern Recogn. Artif. Intell. (2019)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Physics and Electronical EngineeringYancheng Teachers UniversityYanchengChina
  2. 2.College of Telecommunications and Information EngineeringNanjing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations