Advertisement

Epilogue When Does the “Heart” Take Over? Some Reflections on Archaeologies of the Heart

Exploring the Role of Emotion and Spirit in Archaeological Research and Practice
  • Margaret W. ConkeyEmail author
Chapter
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

In this Epilogue to the volume, I consider what a heart-centered approach brings to an archaeology of the 21st century by drawing on “lessons from others”; that is, from three different mostly outside-of -archaeology sources who have considered in their own ways how we can be more heart-centered: one calls for more STEMpathy in our increasing technology-centered world. Another reminds us that, in history (as in archaeology) we have a great responsibility in remembering the past for the dead. And lastly, in keeping with the motivation for this entire volume, I remind our readers to consider deeply the contributions and ideas associated with both Indigenous and feminist archaeologies. I applaud this endeavor to take on more affective and open research practices.

References

  1. Beardsley, F. (2016). Respect for the Ancients. Science Magazine, 354(6317), 1242.Google Scholar
  2. Day, G. (2010, November 25). Review of the fiction of narrative: Essays on history, literature and theory 1957–2007 by Hayden White. The Times Higher Education.Google Scholar
  3. Elliott, D., & Culhane, D. (Eds.). (2017). A different kind of ethnography: Imaginative practices and creative methodologies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  4. Freidman, T. L. (2017, January 4). From hands to heads to hearts. New York Times.Google Scholar
  5. Genzlinger, N. (2018, March 10). Hayden White, Historian who explored how past is created, dies at 89. New York Times Obituaries.Google Scholar
  6. Gero, J. (2007) Honoring ambiguity, problematizing certitude. Journal of Achaeological Method and Theory, special issue: Doing Archaeology as a Feminist, Margaret Conkey and Alison Wylie, eds, 14, 311–327.Google Scholar
  7. Seidman, D. (2007). How: Why how we do anything means everything (2011 2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Tringham, R. (1991). Households with faces: The challenge of gender in prehistoric architectural remains. In J. Gero & M. Conkey (Eds.), Engendering archaeology: Women and production in prehistory (pp. 93–131). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Pubs.Google Scholar
  9. White, H. (1996). Storytelling: Historical and ideological. In R. Newman (Ed.), Centuries’ ends, narrative means (pp. 58–78). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Wylie, A. (2007). Doing archaeology as a feminist: An introduction. Journal of Achaeological Method and Theory, special issue: Doing Archaeology as a Feminist, Margaret Conkey and Alison Wylie, eds, 14, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations