Advertisement

Active Metamaterial Skins for Friction Coefficient Control

  • Yujin Park
  • Kenneth J. LohEmail author
Conference paper
  • 467 Downloads
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Nature is ripe with biological organisms that possess unique capabilities of changing their skin for various purposes. In particular, many of these natural phenomena are derived from their unique surface topographies. Many attempts have been made to optimize artificial surfaces to increase or decrease friction depending on operational needs. This study introduces an “active skin” based on mechanical metamaterials that harvest instabilities in order to exploit unusual properties. In its pristine state, the surface properties of flat active skins are governed by its intrinsic material properties. When strained, each of the architected units undergoes out-of-plane deformations that drastically change its surface characteristics (i.e., friction). Notches are introduced at judicious locations to control the buckling orientation or each unit cell that plays an important role in the active skin’s surface friction properties. Thus, based on the idea of harvesting structural instabilities, this study introduces a reversible, reconfigurable, active skin that features programmable 3D deformations.

Keywords

3D printing Active skins Actuation Instability Mechanical metamaterial 

References

  1. 1.
    Garcia-Mayoral R, Jimenez J (2011) Drag reduction by riblets. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 1940:1412–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Domel AG et al (2018) Shark skin-inspired designs that improve aerodynamic performance. J R Soc Interface, 139Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dean B, Bhushan B (2010) Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: a review. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 1929:4775–4806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhushan B, Jung YC (2011) Natural and biomimetic artificial surfaces for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, low adhesion, and drag reduction progress. Mater Sci 1:1–108Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gao H et al (2005) Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion structures of geckos. Mech Mater 2–3:275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Das S et al (2015) Stick-slip friction of gecko-mimetic flaps on smooth and rough surfaces. J R Soc Interface, 104Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lu P et al (2018) A novel surface texture shape for directional friction control. Tribol Lett, 1Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Etsion I, Burstein L (1996) A model for mechanical seals with regular microsurface structure. Tribol Trans 3:677–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gropper D, Wang L, Harvey TJ (2016) Hydrodynamic lubrication of textured surfaces: a review of modeling techniques and key findings. Tribol Int, 509–529Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abdel-Aal HA, El Mansori M (2013) Tribological analysis of the ventral scale structure in a python regiusin relation to laser textured surfaces. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop, 1Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marvi H, Han Y, Sitti M (2015) Actively controlled fibrillar friction surfaces. Appl Phys Lett, 5Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hwang DG, Bartlett MD (2018) Tunable mechanical metamaterials through hybrid kirigami structures. Sci Rep 1:3378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Song Z et al (2015) Kirigami-based stretchable lithium-ion batteries. Sci Rep, 10988Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Materials Science and Engineering ProgramUniversity of California-San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Structural EngineeringUniversity of California-San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations