Enhanced Stability of B-Site W Doped Pr0.6Sr0.4Fe1-xWxO3-δ Ceramic Membranes for Water Splitting

  • Yanbo Liu
  • Hongwei ChengEmail author
  • Xiaofang Xu
  • Qiangchao Sun
  • Chaoyun Liu
  • Qian Xu
  • Xionggang LuEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


A series of perovskite-type oxygen transport membranes (OTM) of Pr0.6Sr0.4Fe1-xWxO3-δ (PSFWx, x = 0, 0.1) were synthesized by sol-gel method. The effects of W doping on the microstructure, chemical stability, and water splitting performance were investigated systematically. With the increase of W doping level, the valence of Fe reduced, which improves chemical stability in reducing atmosphere but decreases the oxygen permeability. The results indicated that the relative content of Fe+3/Fe+4 remained unchanged before and after water splitting experiment, which attributed to the increase of metal oxygen average binding energy (ABE). Furthermore, at long-term water splitting test, the hydrogen production rate of membrane PSF decreased about 10%, but membrane PSFW0.1 almost remained stable and showed good chemical stability, which made it promising for hydrogen production from water splitting.


Oxygen transport membranes Water splitting Chemical stability Hydrogen production 



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51674164, 51874196, 51574163), the Iron and Steel Joint Research Fund of National Natural Science Foundation and China Baowu Steel Group Corp. Ltd (U1860203) and CSA Interdisciplinary Innovation Team.


  1. 1.
    Muhich CL, Evanko BW, Weston K, Lichty P, Liang X, Martinek J, Musgrave CB, Weimer AW (2013) Efficient generation of H2 by splitting water with an isothermal redox cycle. Science 341:540–542Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Momirlan M, Veziroglu TN (2005) The properties of hydrogen as fuel tomorrow in sustainable energy system for a cleaner planet. Int J Hydrogen Energy 30:795–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andrews J, Shabani B (2014) The role of hydrogen in a global sustainable energy strategy. WIREs Energy Environ 3:474–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mazloomi K, Gomes C (2012) Hydrogen as an energy carrier: prospects and challenges. Renew Sust Energy Rev 16:3024–3033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hajjaji N, Baccar I, Pons MN (2014) Energy and exergy analysis as tools for optimization of hydrogen production by glycerol autothermal reforming. Renew Energy 71:368–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cipriani G, Dio VD, Genduso F, Cascia DL, Liga R, Miceli R, Galluzzo GR (2014) Perspective on hydrogen energy carrier and its automotive applications. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:8482–8494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chueh WC, Falter C, Abbott M, Scipio D, Furler P, Haile SM, Steinfeld A (2010) High-flux solar-driven thermochemical dissociation of CO2 and H2O using nonstoichiometric ceria. Science 330:1797–1801Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bičáková O, Straka P (2012) Production of hydrogen from renewable resources and its effectiveness. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:11563–11578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gupta S, Mahapatra MK, Singh P (2015) Lanthanum chromite based perovskites for oxygen transport membrane. Mat Sci Eng R Rep 90:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yao W, Cheng H, Zhao H, Lu X, Zou X, Li S, Li C (2016) Synthesis, oxygen permeability, and structural stability of BaCo0.7Fe0.3-xZrxO3-δ ceramic membranes. J Membr Sci 504:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheng H, Luo L, Yao W, Lu X, Zou X, Zhou Z (2015) Novel cobalt-free CO2-tolerant dual-phase membranes of Ce0.8Sm0.2O2-δ-Ba0.95La0.05Fe1-xZrxO3-δ for oxygen separation. J Membr Sci 491:220–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng H, Lu X, Hu D, Zhang Y, Ding W, Zhao H (2011) Hydrogen production by catalytic partial oxidation of coke oven gas in BaCo0.7Fe0.2Nb0.1O3-δ membranes with surface modification. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:528–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang Y, Cheng H, Chen S (2017) CO2-tolerance and oxygen permeability of novel cobalt-free mixed conductor oxygen-permeable Pr0.6Sr0.4Fe1-xNbxO3-δ membranes. Ceramics Int 43:13791–13799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang Z, Chen D, Dong F (2015) Efficient and CO2-tolerant oxygen transport membranes prepared from high-valence B-site substituted cobalt-free SrFeO3-δ. J Membr Sci 495:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen C, Chen DJ, Gao Y, Shao ZP, Ciucci F (2014) Computational and experimental analysis of Ba0.95La0.05FeO3-d as a cathode material for solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2:14154–14163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen W, Chen CS, Bouwmeester HJM, Nijmeijer A, Winnubst L (2014) Oxygen selective membranes integrated with oxy-fuel combustion. J Membr Sci 463:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guo Y, Yin Y, Tong Z, Yin J, Xiong M, Ma Z (2011) Impact of synthesis technique on the structure and electrochemical characteristics of Pr0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ (PSCF) cathode material. Solid State Ionics 193:18–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wei Y, Tang J, Zhou L, Xue J, Li Z, Wang H (2012) Oxygen separation through U-shaped hollow fiber membrane using pure CO2 as sweep gas. AIChE J 58:2856–2864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sammells AF, Cook RL, White JH, Osborne JJ, MacDuff RC (1992) Rational selection of advanced solid electrolytes for intermediate temperature fuel cells. Solid State Ionics 52:111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dong X, Liu Z, He Y, Jin W, Xu N (2009) SrAl2O4-improved SrCo0.8Fe0.2O3-δ mixed-conducting membrane for effective production of hydrogen from methane. J Membr Sci 331:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Advanced Special Steel & Materials Science and EngineeringShanghai UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations