Scaling up Build Rates in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Metals Using Dimensionless Parameters

  • Jyi Sheuan Ten
  • Hang Li Seet
  • Sharon Mui Ling NaiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


In selective laser melting of metals, the layer thicknesses are typically kept low (20–40 µm) to achieve high geometrical accuracy and surface qualities. These settings lead to low volumetric build rates. To utilize higher layer thicknesses, process optimization and design of experiments are often necessary. In this paper, a method of scaling the process parameters based on melt pool dimensionless parameters is presented. Process parameters optimized for highest density at low laser power and low layer thicknesses were scaled up to higher laser powers and higher layer thicknesses. Due to the different layer thickness, scan rates, spot size and power, the microstructure morphology would be different. This scaling method has been tested in printing stainless steel 316L at a few layer thicknesses. The effect of the scaling on the microstructure and thus mechanical properties such as porosity.


Dimensionless parameters SS316L LPBF High productivity 


  1. 1.
    DebRoy T, Wei HL, Zuback JS, Mukherjee T, Elmer JW, Milewski JO, Beese AM, Wilson-Heid A, De A, Zhang W (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic components—process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci 92:112–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomas-Seale LEJ, Kirkman-Brown JC, Attallah MM, Espino DM, Shepherd DET (2018) The barriers to the progression of additive manufacture: perspectives from UK industry. Int J Prod Econ 198:104–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nguyen B, Luu DN, Nai MLS, Zhu Z, Chen Z, Wei J (2018) The role of powder layer thickness on the quality of SLM printed parts. Arch Civ Mech Eng 18:948–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brandt M (2017) Laser additive manufacturing. Woodhead PublishingGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Letenneur M, Kreitcberg A, Brailovski V (2019) Optimization of laser powder bed fusion processing using a combination of melt pool modeling and design of experiment approaches: density control. J Manuf Mater Process 3(1):21Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rubenchik AM, King WE, Wu SS (2018) Scaling laws for the additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 257:234–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    King WE, Barth HD, Castillo VM, Gallegos GF, Gibbs JW, Hahn DE, Kamath C, Rubenchik AM (2014) Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 214(12):2915–2925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grasso M, Colosimo BM (2017) Process defects and in situ monitoring methods in metal powder bed fusion: a review. Meas Sci Technol 28(4):044005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jyi Sheuan Ten
    • 1
  • Hang Li Seet
    • 1
  • Sharon Mui Ling Nai
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Singapore Institute of Manufacturing TechnologySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations