Advertisement

On the Size Effects in Additively Manufactured Titanium and the Implications in AM Components

  • Daniel BarbaEmail author
  • Carles Alabort
  • Roger C. Reed
  • Enrique Alabort
Conference paper
  • 503 Downloads
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Additive manufacturing of metals has opened a whole new range of complex functional geometries inaccessible by convectional production methods which are called to revolutionise several sectors (i.e., biomedical, aerospace, energy). These parts usually include a wide variety of characteristic elemental length scales from thin walls/struts to bulk regions. The different intrinsic aspects of the manufacturing process (heat fluxes) make the properties of the material strongly size dependent. These dependencies are still unclear, and further investigations are needed in order to ensure the quality of the produced parts. In this work, the variation of the mechanical properties as a function of the component size and build orientation is addressed.

Keywords

Titanium Size-effect Mechanical testing Additive 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to OxMet Technologies Ltd for funding this research. The authors are grateful to Renishaw plc and Lucy Grainger who assisted with build preparation and manufacturing.

References

  1. 1.
    Horn TJ, Harrysson OLA (2012) Overview of current additive manufacturing technologies and selected applications. Sci Prog 95(3):255–282Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917–1928Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simonelli M, Tse YY, Tuck C (2014) On the texture formation of selective laser melted Ti–6Al–4V. Metall Mater Trans A, 45(6):2863–2872Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murr LE, Quinones SA, Gaytan SM, Lopez MI, Rodela A, Martinez EY, Hernandez DH, Martinez E, Medina F, Wicker RB (2009) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti–6Al–4V produced by rapilayer manufacturing, for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2(1):20–32Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao X, Li S, Zhang M, Liu Y, Sercombe TB, Wang S, Hao Y, Yang R, Murr LE (2016) Comparison of the microstructures and mechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V fabricated by selective laser melting and electron beam melting. Mater Des 95:21–31Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Song B, Zhao X, Li S, Han C, Wei Q, Wen S, Liu J, Shi Y (2015) Differences in microstructure and properties between selective laser melting and traditional manufacturing for fabrication of metal parts: a review. Front Mech Eng 10(2):111–125Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yadroitsev I, Bertrand Ph, Smurov I (2007) Parametric analysis of the selective laser melting process. Appl Surf Sci 253(19):8064–8069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simonelli M, Tse YY, Tuck C (2014) Effect of the build orientation on the mechanical properties and fracture modes of SLM Ti–6Al–4V. Mater Sci Eng A 616:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wauthle R, Vrancken B, Beynaerts B, Jorissen K, Schrooten J, Kruth J-P, Van Humbeeck J (2015) Effects of build orientation and heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V lattice structures. Addit Manuf 5:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simonelli M, Tse YY, Tuck C (2014) Effect of the build orientation on the mechanical properties and fracture modes of SLM Ti–6Al–4V. Mater Sci Eng: A 616:1–11Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang D, Yang Y, Liu R, Xiao D, Sun J (2013) Study on the designing rules and processability of porous structure based on selective laser melting (SLM). J Mater Process Technol 213(10):1734–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang X, Xu S, Zhou S, Xu W, Leary M, Choong P, Qian M, Brandt M, Xie YM (2016) Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review. Biomaterials 83:127–141Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Palka K, Pokrowiecki R (2018) Porous titanium implants: a review. Adv Eng Mater 20(5):1700648Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alabort E, Barba D, Reed RC (2019) Design of metallic bone by additive manufacturing. Scr Mater, 164:110–114Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1999) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge university pressGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Neugebauer R, Müller B, Gebauer M, Töppel T (2011) Additive manufacturing boosts efficiency of heat transfer components. Assembly Autom 31(4):344–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al-Ketan O, Rowshan R, Al-Rub RKA (2018) Topology-mechanical property relationship of 3D printed strut, skeletal, and sheet based periodic metallic cellular materials. Addit Manufact 19:167–183Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saha K, Acharya S, Nakamata C (2013) Heat transfer enhancement and thermal performance of lattice structures for internal cooling of airfoil trailing edges. J Therm Sci Eng Appl 5(1):11001Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Young P. Ti–6Al–4V triply periodic minimal surface structures for bone implants fabricated via selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 51:61–73Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Barba
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Carles Alabort
    • 1
  • Roger C. Reed
    • 1
    • 3
  • Enrique Alabort
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of MaterialsUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Aerospace MaterialsETSIAE, Polytechnic University of MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of Engineering ScienceUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  4. 4.OxMet TechnologiesOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations