Advertisement

Experimental Evaluation of Additively Manufactured Continuous Fiber Reinforced Nylon Composites

  • M. Mohammadizadeh
  • I. FidanEmail author
Conference paper
  • 484 Downloads
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Continuous fiber reinforced additive manufacturing (CFRAM) is a promising fabrication technology with a wide range of potential applications in different industries. The potential applications of CFRAM components justify the need for investigation of their thermomechanical properties. In this study, Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA), tensile, and thermal properties of CFRAM components was studied and the effect of fiber percentage on properties was investigated. Nylon was used as thermoplastic polymer matrix and carbon fiber (CF), and fiber glass (FG) as reinforcing agents. It is found that fiber reinforcement improves storage modulus, loss modulus, tensile strength, elastic modulus, thermal conductivity, and heat conduction of nylon. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was used to study printing quality, fiber–matrix interface, and microstructure of composite. The final results in this research study present the basis for industrial applications of fiber reinforced thermoplastic polymers for industrial applications.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Fiber reinforcement Mechanical properties 

References

  1. 1.
    Parandoush P, Lin D (2017) A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Compos Struct 182:36–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gao W et al (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput Aided Des 69:65–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Melenka GW et al (2016) Evaluation and prediction of the tensile properties of continuous fiber-reinforced 3D printed structures. Compos Struct 153:866–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eftekhari M, Fatemi A (2015) Tensile, creep and fatigue behaviours of short fibre reinforced polymer composites at elevated temperatures: a literature survey. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 38(12):1395–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dizon JRC et al (2018) Thermo-mechanical and swelling properties of three-dimensional-printed poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate/silica nanocomposites. MRS Communications, pp. 1–9Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang X et al (2017) 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos B Eng 110:442–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dizon JRC et al (2018) Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Add Manuf 20:44–67Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dickson AN et al (2017) Fabrication of continuous carbon, glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using additive manufacturing. Add Manuf 16:146–152Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohammadizadeh M et al (2018) Creep behavior analysis of additively manufactured fiber-reinforced components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99(5–8):1225–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fidan I et al (2019) The trends and challenges of fiber reinforced additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–18Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Justo J et al (2018) Characterization of 3D printed long fibre reinforced composites. Compos Struct 185:537–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blok LG et al (2018) An investigation into 3D printing of fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. Add Manuf 22:176–186Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tekinalp HL et al (2014) Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol 105:144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mohammadizadeh M et al (2019) 3D printed fiber reinforced polymer composites-structural analysis. Compos B Eng 175:107112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tian X et al (2016) Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 88:198–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Naranjo-Lozada J et al (2019) Tensile properties and failure behavior of chopped and continuous carbon fiber composites produced by additive manufacturing. Add Manuf 26:227–241Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Caminero M et al (2018) Impact damage resistance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling. Compos B Eng 148:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    An HJ et al (2014) Mechanical and thermal properties of long carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide 6 composites. Fibers Polym 15(11):2355–2359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karsli NG, Aytac A (2013) Tensile and thermomechanical properties of short carbon fiber reinforced polyamide 6 composites. Compos B Eng 51:270–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nagendra PS, Prasad V, Ramji K (2017) A study on dynamic mechanical analysis of natural nano banana particle filled polymer matrix composites. Mater Today: Proc 4(8):9081–9086Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reddy, MI, Srinivasa Reddy V (2014) Dynamic mechanical analysis of hemp fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites. Int J Eng Res Technol (IJERT) 3(9):410–415Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Siengchin S, Karger-Kocsis J (2009) Structure and creep response of toughened and nanoreinforced polyamides produced via the latex route: effect of nanofiller type. Compos Sci Technol 69(5):677–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen J et al (2016) Investigation of the nanomechanical properties of nylon 6 and nylon 6/clay nanocomposites at sub-ambient temperatures. J Exp Nanosci 11(9):695–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringTennessee Technological UniversityCookevilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Manufacturing and Engineering Technology, College of EngineeringTennessee Technological UniversityCookevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations