Advertisement

A Novel Titanium Alloy for Additively Manufactured Orthopaedic Implants

  • Enrique AlabortEmail author
  • Daniel Barba
  • Alvaro De Diego
  • Maria Vega Aguirre-Cebrian
  • Roger C. Reed
Conference paper
  • 629 Downloads
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Most existing implants are inherently limited by the mismatch between the performance of metals and biological bone tissues. Moreover, most common biomedical alloys raise toxicological concerns. In this paper, alloy design is used to find optimal metallic titanium compositions which are bio-compatible and which offer inherent lower modulus of elasticity for optimal bone compliance. The alloys were also optimised for additive manufacturing: alloys with low cracking susceptibility and tendency to form fine microstructures were isolated. An optimal alloy composition was then produced and manufactured by 3D printing. Mechanical experiments on manufactured material under tension reveal the stiffness and strength of the alloy. This work confirms the suitability of the titanium alloy to lower the stiffness of traditional biomedical alloys while being additively manufacturable and strong.

Keywords

Titanium alloys Additive manufacturing Biomedical Implants 

References

  1. 1.
    Sumner DR (2015) Long-term implant fixation and stress-shielding in total hip replacement. J Biomech 48(5):797–800Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ridzwan MI, Shuib S, Hassan AY, Shokri AA, Mohammad Ibrahim MN (2007) Problem of stress shielding and improvement to the hip implant designs: a review. J Med Sci 7(3):460–467Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Niinomi M, Nakai M (2011) Titanium-based biomaterials for preventing stress shielding between implant devices and bone. Int J BiomaterGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arabnejad S, Johnston B, Tanzer M, Pasini D (2017) Fully porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress-shielding following total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 35(8):1774–1783Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knudson D (1989) Fundamentals of biomechanicsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Velasco MA, Narváez-Tovar CA, Garzón-Alvarado DA (2015) Design, materials, and mechanobiology of biodegradable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Res Int 2015Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, Valiquette N (1991) Dental implant design–effect on bone remodeling. J Biomed Mater Res 25(4):467–483Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han MK, Kim JY, Hwang MJ, Song HJ, Park YJ (2015) Effect of Nb on the microstructure, mechanical properties, corrosion behavior, and cytotoxicity of Ti-Nb alloys. Materials 8(9):5986–6003Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Markhoff J, Krogull M, Schulze C, Rotsch C, Hunger S, Bader R (2017) Biocompatibility and inflammatory potential of titanium alloys cultivated with human osteoblasts, fibroblasts and macrophages. Materials 10(1):9–12Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Markhoff J, Weinmann M, Schulze C, Bader R (2017) Influence of different grained powders and pellets made of Niobium and Ti-42Nb on human cell viability. Mater Sci Eng: C, 73:756–766Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schulze C, Weinmann M, Schweigel C, Keßler O, Bader R (2018) Mechanical properties of a newly additive manufactured implant material based on Ti-42Nb. Materials 11(1):13–16Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vandenbroucke B, Kruth J (2007) Selective laser melting of biocompatible metals for rapid manufacturing of medical parts. Rapid Prototyping J 13(4):196–203Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tan XP, Tan YJ, Chow CS, Tor SB, Yeong WY (2017) Metallic powder-bed based 3D printing of cellular scaffolds for orthopaedic implants: A state-of-the-art review on manufacturing, topological design, mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng C 76:1328–1343Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Martinez E (2012) Fabricating Functional Ti-Alloy Biomedical Implants by Additive Manufacturing Using Electron Beam Melting. J Biotechnol Biomater 02(03)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alabort E, Barba D, Reed RC (2019) Design of metallic bone by additive manufacturing. Scripta Mater 164:110–114Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hao L, Raymont C, Yan C, Hussein A, Young P (2011) Design and additive manufacturing of cellular lattice structures. In: Innovative developments in virtual and physical prototyping (November 2014), pp 249–254Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Otsuki B, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T (2006) Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: Three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials 27(35):5892–5900Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Badrossamay M, Childs THC (2007) Further studies in selective laser melting of stainless and tool steel powders. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(5):779–784Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jinhui L, Ruidi L, Wenxian Z, Liding F, Huashan Y (2010) Study on formation of surface and microstructure of stainless steel part produced by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Technol 26(10):1259–1264Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thijs L, Verhaeghe F, Craeghs T, Humbeeck JV, Kruth JP (2010) A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V. Acta Mater 58(9):3303–3312Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leuders S, Thöne M, Riemer A, Niendorf T, Tröster T, Richard HA, Maier HJ (2013) On the mechanical behaviour of titanium alloy TiA16V4 manufactured by selective laser melting: Fatigue resistance and crack growth performance. Int J Fatigue 48:300–307Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ghouse S, Babu S, Van Arkel RJ, Nai K, Hooper PA, Jeffers JR (2017) The influence of laser parameters and scanning strategies on the mechanical properties of a stochastic porous material. Mater Des 131:498–508Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ashby MF, Gibson LJ, Wegst U, Olive R (1995) The Mechanical Properties of Natural Materials. I. Material Property Charts. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 450(1938):123–140Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrique Alabort
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel Barba
    • 2
  • Alvaro De Diego
    • 2
  • Maria Vega Aguirre-Cebrian
    • 2
  • Roger C. Reed
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.OxMet TechnologiesOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Aerospace MaterialsETSIAE, Polytechnic University of MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of Engineering ScienceUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  4. 4.Department of MaterialsUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations