Advertisement

Thermodynamic and Kinetic Modelling of Molten Oxide Electrolysis Cells

  • William D. Judge
  • Gisele AzimiEmail author
Conference paper
  • 359 Downloads
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Direct electrolytic extraction of molten iron from its oxide is an attractive alternative technology for reducing, or eliminating, greenhouse gas emissions associated with iron and steelmaking. While significant progress has been made to develop the process on the laboratory and industrial scales, there is no information on the anticipated performance of large-scale molten oxide electrolysis cells in the open literature. In this work, we present a detailed thermodynamic and kinetic model to describe large-scale molten oxide electrolysis cells. The model simultaneously considers the effect of different thermodynamic and kinetic parameters to predict energy requirements (kW h/tonne) and throughput (tonnes/day) of electrolysis cells. In instances where existing technical or engineering information is absent for molten oxide electrolysis cells, analogy was drawn to Hall-Héroult cells for aluminum electrolysis.

Keywords

Molten oxide electrolysis Current efficiency Energy consumption Modelling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada (Grant number: 498382).

References

  1. 1.
    World Steel Association (2019) Steel statistical yearbook. Belgium, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carpenter A (2012) CO2 abatement in the iron and steel industry. IEA Clean Coal Centre, pp 67–70Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    International Energy Agency (2017) Energy technology perspectives 2017, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sadoway DR (1995) New opportunities for metal extraction and waste treatment by electrochemical processing in molten salts. J Mater Res 10(3):487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim H, Paramore J, Allanore A, Sadoway DR (2011) Electrolysis of molten iron oxide with an iridium anode: the role of electrolyte basicity. J Electrochem Soc 158(10):E101–E105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang D, Gmitter AJ, Sadoway DR (2011) Production of oxygen gas and liquid metal by electrochemical decomposition of molten iron oxide. J Electrochem Soc 158(6):E51–E54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Allanore A (2017) Electrochemical engineering for commodity metals extraction. Interface 26(2):63–68Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Judge WD, Allanore A, Sadoway DR, Azimi G (2017) E-logpO2 diagrams for ironmaking by molten oxide electrolysis. Electrochim Acta 247:1088–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Judge WD, Azimi G (2018) Electrochemical behaviour of iron in molten oxides. ECS Trans 85(4):91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barati M, Coley KS (2006) Electrical and electronic conductivity of CaO-SiO2-FeOx slags at various oxygen potentials: part II. Mechanism and a model of electronic conduction. Metall Mater Trans B 37(1):51–60Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bale CW, Bélisle E, Chartrand P, Decterov SA, Eriksson G, Gheribi AE, Hack K, Jung IH, Kang Y, Melançon J, Pelton AD, Petersen S, Robelin C, Sangster J, Spencer P, Van Ende M (2016) Factsage thermochemical software and databases, 2010–2016. CALPHAD 54:35–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allibert M, Gaye H, Geiseler J (1995) Slag atlas. Verlag Stahleisen GmbH, Dusseldorf, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee SH, Min DJ (2017) Influence of basicity on anodic reaction in CaO-SiO2-Al2O3 melts. J Electrochem Soc 164(8):H5308–H5314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park J, Rhee PC (2001) Ionic properties of oxygen in slag. J Non Cryst Solids 282(1):7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thonstad J, Fellner P, Haarberg GM, Hives J, Kvande H, Sterten A (2001) Aluminum electrolysis: fundamentals of the Hall-Héroult process. Al-Verlag, DusseldorfGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thonstad J, Rolseth S (1978) On the cathodic overvoltage on aluminium in NaF-AlF3-Al2O3 melts—II. Electrochim Acta 23(3):233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grjotheim K, Nai Xiang F, Kvandet H (1986) Current efficiency measurements in laboratory aluminium cells—IX. Cathodic overvoltage on aluminium-copper alloys. Can Metall Q 25(4):293–296Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keller R, Rolseth S, Thonstad J (1997) Mass transport considerations for the development of oxygen-evolving anodes in aluminum electrolysis. Electrochim Acta 42(12):1809–1817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jessen SW (2008) Mathematical modeling of a Hall Héroult aluminium reduction cell. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Allanore A, Yin L, Sadoway DR (2013) A new anode material for oxygen evolution in molten oxide electrolysis. Nature 497(7449):353–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Caldwell AH, Lai E, Gmitter AJ, Allanore A (2016) Influence of mass transfer and electrolyte composition on anodic oxygen evolution in molten oxides. Electrochim Acta 219:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haupin WE (2016) Principles of aluminum electrolysis. In: Essential readings in light metals. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–11Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ghosh A, Chatterjee A (2015) Ironmaking and steelmaking: theory and practice. PHI Learning Private Limited, Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied ChemistryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations