Improvement of Fatigue Strength in Lightweight Selective Laser Melted Alloys by In-Situ and Ex-Situ Composition and Heat Treatment

  • M. AwdEmail author
  • J. Johannsen
  • T. Chan
  • M. Merghany
  • C. Emmelmann
  • F. Walther
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


Selective laser melting is a powder-bed-fusion process that is applied to different alloys. Thus, it is essential to study what are the different process variables that affect the static, quasi-static, and cyclic mechanical properties. In this contribution, two examples of alloys are introduced: AlSi (AlSi12, AlSi10Mg) and Ti-6Al-4V. The influence of controlled cooling and degassing mechanisms of residual gases is investigated by structural analysis in electron microscopy and X-ray computed tomography. Controlled cooling through platform heating or multi-exposure treatments increased the dendritic width in AlSi alloys and decomposed alpha prime in Ti-6Al-4V. The alteration was a cause for enhanced ductility and slowing of crack propagation. The cyclic deformation is tracked during mechanical testing and is simulated in FE software using a high-throughput methodology to calculate Woehler curves based on Fatemi-Socie damage parameters. The cyclic deformation simulation is in agreement with the experimental data and quantified cyclic damage using Fatemi-Socie parameters.


Selective laser melting Platform heating Remnant porosity Remelting Plastic damage 



The authors thank the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) for its financial support within the research project “Mechanism-based understanding of functional grading focused on fatigue behavior of additively processed Ti-6Al-4V and Al-12Si alloys” (WA 1672/25-1).


  1. 1.
    Song B, Dong S, Zhang B, Liao H, Coddet C (2012) Effects of processing parameters on microstructure and mechanical property of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Des 35:120–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dutta B, Froes F (2017) The additive manufacturing (AM) of titanium alloys. Met Powder Rep 72(2):96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Siddique S, Awd M, Tenkamp J, Walther F (2017) Development of a stochastic approach for fatigue life prediction of AlSi12 alloy processed by selective laser melting. Eng Fail Anal 79:34–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siddique S, Awd M, Tenkamp J, Walther F (2017) High and very high cycle fatigue failure mechanisms in selective laser melted aluminum alloys. J Mater Res 32(23):4296–4304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Awd M, Tenkamp J, Hirtler M, Siddique S, Bambach M, Walther F (2018) Comparison of microstructure and mechanical properties of Scalmalloy® produced by selective laser melting and laser metal deposition. Materials 11(1):1–17Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang Y, Kamath C, Voisin T, Li Z (2018) A processing diagram for high-density Ti-6Al-4V by selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyping J 24(9):1469–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diatlov A, Buchbinder D, Meiners W, Wissenbach K, Bultmann J (2012) Towards surface topography: quantification of selective laser melting (SLM) built parts. In: Innovative developments in virtual and physical prototyping: proceedings of the 5th international conference on advanced research in virtual and rapid prototyping, Taylor and Francis Inc., Leiria, Portugal, pp 595–602Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jamshidinia M, Kovacevic R (2015) The influence of heat accumulation on the surface roughness in powder-bed additive manufacturing. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop 3(1):014003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang Z, Xiao Z, Tse Y, Huang C, Zhang W (2019) Optimization of processing parameters and establishment of a relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties of SLM titanium alloy. Opt Laser Technol 112:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Longhitano G, Larosa M, Jardini A, Zavaglia C, Lerardi M (2018) Correlation between microstructures and mechanical properties under tensile and compression tests of heat-treated Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy produced by additive manufacturing for biomedical applications. J Mater Process Technol 252:202–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simonelli M, Tse Y, Tuck C (2014) Effect of the build orientation on the mechanical properties and fracture modes of SLM Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Sci Eng, A 616:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bagehorn S, Wehr J, Maier H (2017) Application of mechanical surface finishing processes for roughness reduction and fatigue improvement of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V parts. Int J Fatigue 102:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shui X, Yamanaka K, Mori M, Nagata Y, Kurita K, Chiba A (2017) Effects of post-processing on cyclic fatigue response of a titanium alloy additively manufactured by electron beam melting. Mater Sci Eng, A 680:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Benedetti M, Torresani E, Leoni M, Fontanari V, Bandini M, Pederzolli C, Potrich C (2017) The effect of post-sintering treatments on the fatigue and biological behavior of Ti-6Al-4V ELI parts made by selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 71:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wycisk E, Solbach A, Siddique S, Herzog D, Walther F, Emmelmann C (2014) Effects of defects in laser additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V on fatigue properties. Phys Procedia 56:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wycisk E, Siddique S, Herzog D, Walther F, Emmelmann C (2015) Fatigue performance of laser additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V in very high cycle fatigue regime up to 109 cycles. Front Mater 2:2117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu W, Lui E, Pateras A, Qian M, Brandt M (2017) In-situ tailoring microstructure in additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V for superior mechanical performance. Acta Mater 125:390–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mugwagwa L, Dimitrov D, Matope S, Yadroitsev I (2018) Influence of process parameters on residual stress-related distortions in selective laser melting. Procedia Manuf 21:92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Awd
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Johannsen
    • 2
  • T. Chan
    • 1
  • M. Merghany
    • 1
  • C. Emmelmann
    • 2
  • F. Walther
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials Test Engineering (WPT)TU Dortmund UniversityDortmundGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Research Institution for Additive Manufacturing Technologies (IAPT)HamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations