Legal Reboot: From Human Control to Transhuman Possibilities

  • Peter BloomEmail author


The seventh and penultimate chapter examines the profound legal ramifications of transhuman relations. Current law—at least in theory—is focused on interpreting and protecting the rights of citizens. These efforts are based predominantly on a range of universal human rights such as those associated with free speech, habeas corpus and private property. It also encompasses laws that reflect cultural differences. More critically they retain a focus on justifying authority and policing wrongdoing. How will this legal apparatus extend to non-humans? Even more fundamentally how can new technologies reorient the purpose of law in the future from maintaining control to fostering possibility?

This chapter explores the emerging possibilities of transhuman law. It begins by spelling out the evolution of human rights into “transhuman” rights including the right of all forms of consciousness not to be exploited, not to be mentally manipulated (e.g. Turned into a bot), and not be excluded from social networks for reasons of human or non-human prejudice. It will then expand upon these basic rights to investigate the crafting of laws to protect the right of people to expand their mental and physical capacities through technological enhancement. In an even more radical break from conventional human law, it will interrogate the ways virtual reality can be deployed to allow people to act out their wildest most dangerous fantasies without harming others. Finally it will reflect on how transhuman relations can reboot the law and justice to encourage and defend the expression and expansion of individual and collective potential.


  1. Acampora, G., Vitiello, A., Di Nunzio, C., Saliva, M., & Garofano, L. (2015, October). Towards Automatic Bloodstain Pattern Analysis Through Cognitive Robots. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (pp. 2447–2452). IEEE.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, C., & Thompson, T. L. (2016). Researching a Posthuman World: Interviews with Digital Objects. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahluwalia, P. (2016). Two Senses of the Post in Posthumanism. In Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures (pp. 131–141). New Delhi: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Amoudi, I., & Morgan, J. (Eds.). (2018). Realist Responses to Post-Human Society: Ex Machina. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Arkin, R. (2009). Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots. New York: Chapman and Hall and CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asaro, P. M. (2007). Robots and Responsibility from a Legal Perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 20–24.Google Scholar
  7. Asaro, P. (2012). On Banning Autonomous Weapon Systems: Human Rights, Automation, and the Dehumanization of Lethal Decision-Making. International Review of the Red Cross, 94(886), 687–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashrafian, H. (2015a). Intelligent Robots Must Uphold Human Rights. Nature News, 519(7544), 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashrafian, H. (2015b). AIonAI: A Humanitarian Law of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(1), 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ashrafian, H. (2015c). Artificial Intelligence and Robot Responsibilities: Innovating Beyond Rights. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(2), 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bainbridge, W. S. (2017). Transcendence: Virtual Artificial Intelligence. In Dynamic Secularization (pp. 237–268). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Bartneck, C., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Nomura, T. (2007). The Influence of People’s Culture and Prior Experiences with Aibo on Their Attitude Towards Robots. Ai & Society, 21(1–2), 217–230.Google Scholar
  13. Baxi, U. (2009). Human Rights in a Posthuman World: Critical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bayley, A. (2019). How Did ‘We’Become Human in the First Place? Entanglements of Posthumanism and Critical Pedagogy for the Twenty-First Century. In Posthumanism and Higher Education (pp. 359–365). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bayne, S., & Ross, J. (2013). Posthuman Literacy in Heterotopic Space: A Pedagogical Proposal. In Literacy in the Digital University: Critical Perspectives on Learning, Scholarship, and Technology (pp. 95–110). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Bello, S. K. (2015). Robotics Application in Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Prospects and Challenges in a Developing Country. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Research, 5(5), 354–362.Google Scholar
  17. Bennett, L. (2016). Thinking Like a Brick: Posthumanism and Building Materials. In Posthuman Research Practices in Education (pp. 58–74). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Berman, D. H., & Hafner, C. D. (1989). The Potential of Artificial Intelligence to Help Solve the Crisis in Our Legal System. Communications of the ACM, 32(8), 928–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bethel, C. L., Eakin, D. K., Anreddy, S., Stuart, J. K., & Carruth, D. (2013, March). Eyewitnesses Are Misled by Human But Not Robot Interviewers. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 25–32). IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  20. Bignall, S., Hemming, S., & Rigney, D. (2016). Three Ecosophies for the Anthropocene: Environmental Governance, Continental Posthumanism and Indigenous Expressivism. Deleuze Studies, 10(4), 455–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Boden, M., Bryson, J., Caldwell, D., Dautenhahn, K., Edwards, L., Kember, S., … & Sorrell, T. (2017). Principles of Robotics: Regulating Robots in the Real World. Connection Science, 29(2), 124–129.Google Scholar
  22. Botz-Bornstein, T. (2015). Virtual Reality: The Last Human Narrative? Leiden: BRILL.Google Scholar
  23. Braidotti, R. O. S. I. (2017). Posthuman, All Too Human: The Memoirs and Aspirations of a Posthumanist. Tanner Lectures, Yale University.Google Scholar
  24. Braverman, I. (2015). More-Than-Human Legalities. The Handbook of Law and Society, 307.Google Scholar
  25. Brians, E. (2011). The “Virtual” Body and the Strange Persistence of the Flesh: Deleuze, Cyberspace and the Posthuman. Deleuze and the Body, 117–143.Google Scholar
  26. Broekhuizen, F., Dawes, S., Mikelli, D., Wilde, P., & Hall, G. (2016). Just Because You Write About Posthumanism Doesn’t Mean You Aren’ta Liberal Humanist: An Interview with Gary Hall. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network, 9(1).
  27. Brundage, M. (2015). Utopia, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of Justice.Google Scholar
  28. Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., …, & Anderson, H. (2018). The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07228.Google Scholar
  29. Bryson, J. J. (2010). Robots Should be Slaves. Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issues, 63–74.Google Scholar
  30. Butler, P. (2018). Making Enhancement Equitable: A Racial Analysis of the Term “Human Animal” and the Inclusion of Black Bodies in Human Enhancement. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 2(1), 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Calo, R. (2016). Robots as Legal Metaphors. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 30, 209.Google Scholar
  32. Carnevale, A. (2015). Robots, Disability, and Good Human Life. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(1).Google Scholar
  33. Coeckelbergh, M. (2010a). Robot Rights? Towards a Social-Relational Justification of Moral Consideration. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(3), 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Coeckelbergh, M. (2010b). Moral Appearances: Emotions, Robots, and Human Morality. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(3), 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cordeiro, J. (2016). Technological Evolution and Transhumanism. In Deploying Foresight for Policy and Strategy Makers (pp. 81–92). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. (2015). Liberation for Straw Dogs? Old Materialism, New Materialism, and the Challenge of an Emancipatory Posthumanism. Globalizations, 12(1), 134–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. (2017a). The Emancipatory Project of Posthumanism. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. (2017b). Post-Human Security. In Global Insecurity (pp. 65–81). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Datta, R. (2016). How to Practice Posthumanism in Environmental Learning: Experiences with North American and South Asian Indigenous Communities. IAFOR Journal of Education, 4(1), 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dilek, S., Çakır, H., & Aydın, M. (2015). Applications of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Combating Cyber Crimes: A Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03552.Google Scholar
  41. Docherty, B. (2012). Losing Humanity: The Case Against Killer Robots.Google Scholar
  42. Dumas, A., & Turner, B. S. (2015). Introduction: Human Longevity, Utopia, and Solidarity. The Sociological Quarterly, 56(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ess, C. M. (2017). What’s Love Got to Do with It? Robots, Sexuality, and the Arts of Being Human. In Social Robots (pp. 57–79). Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fleckenstein, K. S., Keogh, B., Lee, J. R., Levy, M. A., McArthur, E., Mehler, J., … & Van Den Eede, Y. (2014). Design, Mediation, and the Posthuman. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  45. Forlano, L. (2017). Posthumanism and Design. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(1), 16–29.Google Scholar
  46. Fortunati, L. (2017). The Human Body: Natural and Artificial Technology. In Machines That Become Us (pp. 71–87). Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Fox, S. (2018). Cyborgs, Robots and Society: Implications for the Future of Society From Human Enhancement with in-the-Body Technologies. Technologies, 6(2), 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Frentz, T. S. (2014). Transcending Embodiment: Communication in the Posthuman Condition. Southern Communication Journal, 79(1), 59–72.Google Scholar
  49. Fuller, S. (2016). Morphological Freedom and the Question of Responsibility and Representation in Transhumanism. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics, 4(2), 33–45.Google Scholar
  50. Gaard, G. (2017). Posthumanism, Ecofeminism, and Inter-Species Relations. In Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment (pp. 115–129). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gladden, M. E. (2015). Utopias and Dystopias as Cybernetic Information Systems: Envisioning the Posthuman Neuropolity.Google Scholar
  52. Gless, S., Silverman, E., & Weigend, T. (2016). If Robots Cause Harm, Who Is to Blame? Self-Driving Cars and Criminal Liability. New Criminal Law Review: In International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 412–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Godin, C. (2018). What Would Human Rights with the Posthuman Become? Journal international de bioethique et d’ethique des sciences, 29(3), 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gorski, P. (2017). Human Flourishing and Human Morphogenesis: A Critical Realist Interpretation and Critique. In Morphogenesis and Human Flourishing (pp. 29–43). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Graffam, G. (2012). A Posthuman Perspective on Virtual Worlds. In Human No More: Digital Subjectivities, Unhuman Subjects, and the End of Anthropology (pp. 131–146). Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  56. Grunwald, A. (2016). What Does the Debate on (Post) human Futures Tell Us? In Perfecting Human Futures (pp. 35–50). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  57. Gubrud, M. (2014). Stopping Killer Robots. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 70(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gunkel, D. J. (2018). Robot Rights. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hallevy, G. (2010). The Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence Entities-From Science Fiction to Legal Social Control. Akron Intellectual Property Journal, 4, 171.Google Scholar
  60. Hartzog, W. (2014). Unfair and Deceptive Robots. Maryland Law Review, 74, 785.Google Scholar
  61. Hayles, N. K. (2002). Flesh and Metal: Reconfiguring the Mindbody in Virtual Environments. Configurations, 10(2), 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hayles, N. K. (2008). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Herndl, D. P. (2013). Virtual Cancer: BRCA and Posthuman Narratives of Deleterious Mutation. Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 25–45.Google Scholar
  64. Hobden, S. (2015). Being “a Good Animal” Adorno, Posthumanism, and International Relations. Alternatives, 40(3–4), 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hua, J., & Ray, K. (2016). The Lives of Things: Native Objects, Human Rights and NDN-Indian Relationality. Prose Studies, 38(1), 12–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Huff, C. (2017). After Auto, After Bio: Posthumanism and Life Writing. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 32(2), 279–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hughes, J. (2011). After Happiness, Cyborg Virtue. Free Inquiry, 32(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  68. Huneeus, A. (2018). Human Rights and the Future of Being Human. AJIL Unbound, 112, 324–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Islam, M. M. (2016). Posthumanism: Through the Postcolonial Lens. In Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures (pp. 115–129). New Delhi: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Iuga, I. (2016). Transhumanism Between Human Enhancement and Technological Innovation. Symposion, 3(1), 79–88.Google Scholar
  71. Jenkins, C. (2015). Reproduction by Design: Sex, Robots, Trees, & Test-Tube Babies in Interwar Britain, Angus McLaren. Canadian Bulletin of Medical History, 32(2), 433–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Jenkins, N. (2017a). No Substitute for Human Touch? Towards a Critically Posthumanist Approach to Dementia Care. Ageing & Society, 37(7), 1484–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Jenkins, N. (2017b, April). I’d Rather be a Cyborg Than An” Individual” with Dementia: Exploring Critical Posthumanism and Its Application to Dementia Policy and Practice. In Aging Graz 2017 International Conference: Cultural Narratives, Process & Strategies in Representations of Age and Aging.Google Scholar
  74. Joh, E. E. (2016). Policing Police Robots. UCLA Law Review Discourse, 64, 516.Google Scholar
  75. Johnson, A. M., & Axinn, S. (2013). The Morality of Autonomous Robots. Journal of Military Ethics, 12(2), 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Kahn, P. H., Ishiguro, H., Friedman, B., & Kanda, T. (2006, September). What Is a Human?-Toward Psychological Benchmarks in the Field of Human-Robot Interaction. In ROMAN 2006-The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 364–371). IEEE.Google Scholar
  77. Käll, J. (2017). Converging Human and Digital Bodies. Posthumanism, Property, Law.Google Scholar
  78. Karamanou, M., Papaioannou, T. G., Soulis, D., & Tousoulis, D. (2017). Engineering ‘Posthumans’: To Be or Not to Be? Trends in Biotechnology, 35(8), 677–679.Google Scholar
  79. Keogh, B. (2014). Cybernetic Memory and the Construction of the Posthuman Self in Videogame Play. Design, Mediation, and the Posthuman, 233–248.Google Scholar
  80. Kessler, N. H. (2018). Ontology and Closeness in Human-Nature Relationships: Beyond Dualisms, Materialism and Posthumanism. Springer.Google Scholar
  81. Keyvanpour, M. R., Javideh, M., & Ebrahimi, M. R. (2011). Detecting and Investigating Crime by Means of Data Mining: A General Crime Matching Framework. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 872–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Kim, R. E. (2010). The principle of sustainability: Transforming law and governance. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 4(2), 309–312.Google Scholar
  83. King, T. C., Aggarwal, N., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2019). Artificial Intelligence Crime: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Foreseeable Threats and Solutions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–32.Google Scholar
  84. Kirk, R. G., Pemberton, N., & Quick, T. (2019). Being Well Together? Promoting Health and Well-Being Through More Than Human Collaboration and Companionship. Medical Humanities, 45(1), 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Koch, A. (2005). Cyber Citizen or Cyborg Citizen: Baudrillard, Political Agency, and the Commons in Virtual Politics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 20(2–3), 159–175.Google Scholar
  86. Kruger, F. (2016). Posthumanism and Educational Research for Sustainable Futures. Journal of Education, 65, 77–94.Google Scholar
  87. Kyriakidou, M. (2016). Discussing Robot Crime Interviewers for Children’s Forensic Testimonies: A Relatively New Field for Investigation. AI & Society, 31(1), 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Lee, J. (2016). Cochlear Implantation, Enhancements, Transhumanism and Posthumanism: Some Human Questions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(1), 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Legarreta, P. (2018). Disruptive Capitalism: The Global Digital Network, the Colonization of Minds and the Fight for Humankind Emancipation. Derecom, 25, 3.Google Scholar
  90. Lehto, P., Ainamo, A., & Porokuokka, J. (2018). The Role of Master’s Level Students: Case Robots and Future of Welfare Services. In ICERI2018 Proceedings.Google Scholar
  91. Lenoir, T. (2002). Makeover: Writing the Body into the Posthuman Technoscape: Part One: Embracing the Posthuman. Configurations, 10(2), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Leslie-McCarthy, S. (2007). Asimov’s Posthuman Pharisees: The Letter of the Law Versus the Spirit of the Law in Isaac Asimov’s Robot Novels. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 3(3), 398–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Liu, H. Y., & Zawieska, K. (2017). From Responsible Robotics Towards a Human Rights Regime Oriented to the Challenges of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence. Ethics and Information Technology, 1–13.Google Scholar
  94. Luciano, D., & Chen, M. Y. (2015). Introduction: Has the Queer Ever Been Human? GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21(2), iv–207.Google Scholar
  95. Marchesini, R. (2017). Over the Human: Post-Humanism and the Concept of Animal Epiphany (Vol. 4). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Margulies, J. D., & Bersaglio, B. (2018). Furthering Post-Human Political Ecologies. Geoforum, 94, 103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Marino, D., & Tamburrini, G. (2006). Learning Robots and Human Responsibility. International Review of Information Ethics, 6(12), 46–51.Google Scholar
  98. McNally, P., & Inayatullah, S. (1988). The Rights of Robots: Technology, Culture and Law in the 21st Century. Futures, 20(2), 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. McNeill, L. (2012). There Is No “I” in Network: Social Networking Sites and Posthuman Auto/Biography. Biography, 65–82.Google Scholar
  100. MDIV, J. S. (2012). Are We Forming Ourselves for a Posthuman Future? Ethics & Medicine, 28(2), 81.Google Scholar
  101. Meissner, G. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: Consciousness and Conscience. AI & Society, 1–11.Google Scholar
  102. Morgan, B., & Kuch, D. (2015). Radical Transactionalism: Legal Consciousness, Diverse Economies, and the Sharing Economy. Journal of Law and Society, 42(4), 556–587.Google Scholar
  103. Müller, V. C., & Simpson, T. W. (2016). Autonomous Killer Robots Are Probably Good News. In Drones and Responsibility: Legal, Philosophical and Socio-Technical Perspectives on the Use of Remotely Controlled Weapons (pp. 67–81).Google Scholar
  104. Musiał, M. (2018). Loving Dolls and Robots: From Freedom to Objectification, from Solipsism to Autism? In Exploring Erotic Encounters (pp. 152–168). Leiden: Brill Rodopi.Google Scholar
  105. Naastepad, C. W. M., & Houghton Budd, C. (2019). Preventing Technological Unemployment by Widening our Understanding of Capital and Progress: Making Robots Work for Us. Ethics and Social Welfare, 1–18.Google Scholar
  106. Naastepad, C. W. M., & Mulder, J. M. (2018). Robots and Us: Towards an Economics of the ‘Good Life’. Review of Social Economy, 76(3), 302–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Ndonye, M. M. (2019). Mass-Mediated Feminist Scholarship Failure in Africa: Normalised Body-Objectification as Artificial Intelligence (AI).Google Scholar
  108. Nurka, C. (2015). Animal Techne: Transing Posthumanism. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2(2), 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Onishi, B. B. (2011). Information, Bodies, and Heidegger: Tracing Visions of the Posthuman. Sophia, 50(1), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Osoba, O. A., & Welser, W., IV. (2017). An Intelligence in Our Image: The Risks of Bias and Errors in Artificial Intelligence. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Owen, T., & Owen, J. (2015). Virtual Criminology: Insights from Genetic-Social Science and Heidegger. Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology, 7(1), 17.Google Scholar
  112. Pagallo, U. (2011). Robots of Just War: A Legal Perspective. Philosophy & Technology, 24(3), 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Pagallo, U. (2013a). The Laws of Robots: Crimes, Contracts, and Torts (Vol. 10). Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  114. Pagallo, U. (2013b). What Robots Want: Autonomous Machines, Codes and New Frontiers of Legal Responsibility. In Human Law and Computer Law: Comparative Perspectives (pp. 47–65). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Pagallo, U. (2017). AI and Bad Robots: The Criminology of Automation. In The Routledge Handbook of Technology, Crime and Justice (pp. 642–652). Routledge.Google Scholar
  116. Palk, A. C. (2015). The implausibility of appeals to human dignity: an investigation into the efficacy of notions of human dignity in the transhumanism debate. South African Journal of Philosophy [Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Wysbegeerte], 34(1), 39–54.Google Scholar
  117. Parry, B. (2018). The Social Life of “Scaffolds” Examining Human Rights in Regenerative Medicine. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(1), 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Pasfield-Neofitou, S. (2017). Technologically Mediated Identity: Personal Computers, Online Aliases, and Japanese Robots. In Reconstructing Identity (pp. 207–242). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Pearsall, B. (2010). Predictive Policing: The Future of Law Enforcement. National Institute of Justice Journal, 266(1), 16–19.Google Scholar
  120. Pedersen, I., & Blakesley, D. (2013). Ready to Wear: A Rhetoric of Wearable Computers and Reality-Shifting Media. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
  121. Perry, W. L. (2013). Predictive Policing: The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Peters, R. A. (2018, July). Re-creation, Consciousness Transfer and Digital Duplication: The Question of ‘What Counts as Human?’in Charlie Brooker’s Black Mirror. In Film-Philosophy Conference 2018.Google Scholar
  123. Pickering, A. (2001). Practice and Posthumanism: Social Theory and a History of Agency. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, 163–174.Google Scholar
  124. Pitti, A. (2018). Ideas from Developmental Robotics and Embodied AI on the Questions of Ethics in Robots. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.07506.Google Scholar
  125. Porpora, D. V. (2017). Dehumanization in Theory: Anti-Humanism, Non-Humanism, Post-Humanism, and Trans-Humanism. Journal of Critical Realism, 16(4), 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Porter, A. (2017, June). Bioethics and Transhumanism. In The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 42(3), 237–260. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  127. Rabkin, J., & Yoo, J. (2017). Striking Power: How Cyber, Robots, and Space Weapons Change the Rules for War. New York: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
  128. Reid, M. (2016). Rethinking the Fourth Amendment in the Age of Supercomputers, Artificial Intelligence, and Robots. West Virginia Law Review, 119, 863.Google Scholar
  129. Ribaux, O., Baylon, A., Roux, C., Delémont, O., Lock, E., Zingg, C., & Margot, P. (2010). Intelligence-Led Crime Scene Processing. Part I: Forensic Intelligence. Forensic Science International, 195(1–3), 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Robertson, J. (2017). Robo Sapiens Japanicus: Robots, Gender, Family, and the Japanese Nation. Oakland, CA: Univ of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Rose, G. (2017). Posthuman Agency in the Digitally Mediated City: Exteriorization, Individuation, Reinvention. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(4), 779–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Rose, D. E. (2019). Tracing the Subjectivities of the Changing Human: Hegel, Self-Understanding, and Posthuman Objective Freedom. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 2(2), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Salvini, P., Teti, G., Spadoni, E., Frediani, E., Boccalatte, S., Nocco, L., … & Carrozza, P. (2010). An Investigation on Legal Regulations for Robot Deployment in Urban Areas: A Focus on Italian Law. Advanced Robotics, 24(13), 1901–1917.Google Scholar
  134. Schuller, A. L. (2017). At the Crossroads of Control: The Intersection of Artificial Intelligence in Autonomous Weapon Systems with International Humanitarian Law. Harvard National Security Journal, 8, 379.Google Scholar
  135. Sharkey, N. (2009). The Robot Arm of the Law Grows Longer. Computer, 42(8), 116–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Sharkey, N., Goodman, M., & Ross, N. (2010). The Coming Robot Crime Wave. Computer, 43(8), 115–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Sharkey, N., & Sharkey, A. (2011). 17 the Rights and Wrongs of Robot Care. Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, 267.Google Scholar
  138. Shoham, Y., & Tennenholtz, M. (1995). On Social Laws for Artificial Agent Societies: Off-Line Design. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1–2), 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Silva, D. F. (2017). From Human to Person: Detaching Personhood from Human Nature. In Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn (pp. 113–125). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Smart, A., & Smart, J. (2017). Posthumanism: Anthropological Insights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  141. Smithers, T. (1997). Autonomy in Robots and Other Agents. Brain and Cognition, 34(1), 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Sorgner, S. L. (2016). Perfecting Human Beings: from Kant and Nietzsche to Trans-and Posthumanism. Trans-Humanities Journal, 9(1), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Stagliano, A. (2019). Experiments in Posthumanism: On Tactical Rhetorical Encounters Between Drones and Human Body Heat. Computers and Composition, 52, 242–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Stelarc, D. (2000). From Psycho-body to Cyber-systems: Images as Post-human Entities. In D. Bell & B. M. Kennedy (Eds.), The Cybercultures Reader (pp. 560–576). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  145. Stone, C. B., Neely, A. R., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2018). Human Resource Management in the Digital Age: Big Data, HR Analytics and Artificial Intelligence. In Management and Technological Challenges in the Digital Age (pp. 13–42). CRC Press.Google Scholar
  146. Terec-Vlad, L., & Terec-Vlad, D. (2014). About the Evolution of the Human Species: Human Robots and Human Enhancement. Postmodern Openings/Deschideri Postmoderne, 5(3).Google Scholar
  147. Terranova, T. (1996). Posthuman Unbounded: Artificial Evolution and High-Tech Subcultures. FutureNatural: Nature, Science, Culture, 146–164.Google Scholar
  148. Thomaz, A. L., & Breazeal, C. (2008). Teachable Robots: Understanding Human Teaching Behavior to Build More Effective Robot Learners. Artificial Intelligence, 172(6–7), 716–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Thweatt-Bates, J., van Huyssteen, J. W., & Wiebe, E. P. (2011). Posthuman Selves: Bodies, Cognitive Processes, and Technologies. In In Search of self: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Personhood (p. 243). Cambridge: Wm. B. Erdmann’s.Google Scholar
  150. Timmins, B. (2017). New Sex Robots With ‘Frigid’Settings Allow Men to Simulate Rape. The Independent.Google Scholar
  151. Trigt, P. V., Kool, J., & Schippers, A. (2016). Humanity as a Contested Concept: Relations Between Disability and‘Being Human’. Social Inclusion, 4(4), 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Veronese, C. (2016). Can the Humanities Become Post-Human: Interview with Rosi Braidotti. Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, 4, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. von Essen, U. E., & Bornemark, J. (2019). Between Behaviourism, Posthumanism, and Animal Rights Theory. Equine Cultures in Transition: Ethical Questions.Google Scholar
  154. Vuong, T., Filippoupolitis, A., Loukas, G., & Gan, D. (2014, March). Physical Indicators of Cyber Attacks Against a Rescue Robot. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PERCOM WORKSHOPS) (pp. 338–343). IEEE.Google Scholar
  155. Wakefield, J. (2019, March 21). Can You Murder a Robot, BBC World Service Documentary.Google Scholar
  156. Waldby, C. (2003). The Visible Human Project: Informatic Bodies and Posthuman Medicine. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Walsh, S. N., & Sculos, B. W. (2018). Repressive Robots and the Radical Possibilities of Emancipated Automation. In The Political Economy of Robots (pp. 101–125). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Walton, R., & Rose, E. J. (2018). Factors to Actors: Implications of Posthumanism for Social Justice Work. In Posthuman Praxis in Technical Communication (pp. 91–117). Routledge.Google Scholar
  159. Wang, X., Liu, L., & Eck, J. (2008). Crime Simulation Using GIS and Artificial Intelligent Agents. In Artificial Crime Analysis Systems: Using Computer Simulations and Geographic Information Systems (pp. 209–225). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Wang, F. Y., Wang, X., Li, L., & Li, L. (2016). Steps Toward Parallel Intelligence. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 3(4), 345–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Waters, B. (2016). From Human to Posthuman: Christian Theology and Technology in a Postmodern World. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Weaver, J. F. (2013). Robots Are People Too: How Siri, Google Car, and Artificial Intelligence Will Force Us to Change Our Laws. ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  163. Whitehead, P. M. (2017). Expanding the Category “Human”: Nonhumanism, Posthumanism, and Humanistic Psychology. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  164. Wolfe, C. (2018). Posthumanism Thinks the Political: A Genealogy for Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(2), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of EssexColchesterUK

Personalised recommendations