Introduction: Preparing for a “Transhuman” Future

  • Peter BloomEmail author


This chapter will introduce the main theme of the book—how can humans prepare today for a “transhuman” tomorrow. In particular one where we share the world with a range of new and emerging forms of “smart consciousness”. Questions will be asked such as whether existing perspectives on human relations are sufficient for a coming age where “the internet of everything” is a daily and global reality. Will robots have “human rights”? Will individuals apply for the same jobs as a “conscious” automated employee? Can humans and A.I. learn from each other to create new forms of knowledge and social relations?

The chapter will begin by highlighting the imminent emergence of a “smart world” and what this means. It will then explore the fears and hopes these changes will bring—ranging from dystopian visions of a robot controlled future to utopian hopes of a technologically enlightened society. Following this critical discussion, it will focus on the almost complete lack of thinking (either from academics or policy makers) surrounding the concrete cultural norms, ethical concerns, laws and public administration required to make this an empowering rather than disempowering shift. It will conclude by highlighting the need for humans to fundamentally evolve their thinking, practices and physical existence to meet the challenges and opportunities of this new “smart” revolution.


  1. Alexandre, L., & Besnier, J. M. (2018). Do Robots Make Love?: From AI to Immortality–Understanding Transhumanism in 12 Questions. Cassell.Google Scholar
  2. Åsberg, C. (2013). The Timely Ethics of Posthumanist Gender Studies. Feministische Studien, 31(1).
  3. Åsberg, C., Koobak, R., & Johnson, E. (2011). Beyond the Humanist Imagination. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 19(4), 218–230. Scholar
  4. Austin, R. D., & Pisano, G. P. (2017). Neurodiversity as a Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review, 95(3), 96–103.Google Scholar
  5. Balakrishnan, V. S. (2018). The Birth of Consciousness: I Think, Therefore I Am? The Lancet Neurology, 17(5), 402.Google Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, S. (2017). Editorial Perspective: Neurodiversity – A Revolutionary Concept for Autism and Psychiatry. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(6), 744–747.Google Scholar
  7. Baumann, F. (2010). Humanism and Transhumanism. The New Atlantis, 29, 68–84.Google Scholar
  8. Bayne, S., & Jandrić, P. (2017). From Anthropocentric Humanism to Critical Posthumanism in Digital Education. Knowledge Cultures, 5(2), 197.Google Scholar
  9. Birchall, C. (2019). Algorithmic Intelligence? Reconstructing Citizenship Through Digital Methods. Retrieved October 3, 2019, from
  10. Bishop, J. M. (2016). Singularity, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Artificial Intelligence. In Risks of Artificial Intelligence (p. 267).Google Scholar
  11. Boden, M. (2017). AI: Utopia or Dystopia? Retrieved October 3, 2019, from
  12. Boden, M., Bryson, J., Caldwell, D., Dautenhahn, K., Edwards, L., Kember, S., et al. (2017). Principles of Robotics: Regulating Robots in the Real World. Connection Science, 29(2), 124–129. Scholar
  13. Bostrom, N. (2001). What Is Transhumanism? Retrieved October 3, 2019, from
  14. Bostrom, N. (2005). A History of Transhumanist Thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
  15. Bostrom, N. (2008). Letter from Utopia. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 2(1).
  16. Boyte, H. (2017). John Dewey and Citizen Politics: How Democracy Can Survive Artificial Intelligence and the Credo of Efficiency. Education and Culture, 33(2), 13. Scholar
  17. Braidotti, R. (2018). A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society. Scholar
  18. Brennan, E. (2016). Techno-Apocalypse. In The Last Midnight: Essays on Apocalyptic Narratives in Millennial Media, 53, 206.Google Scholar
  19. Brown, N., & Rappert, B. (2017). Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Burdett, M. (2014). The Religion of Technology: Transhumanism and the Myth of Progress. In C. Mercer & T. Trothen (Eds.), Religion and Transhumanism: The Unknown Future of Human Enhancement: The Unknown Future of Human Enhancement. Santa Barbara: ABL-CIO.Google Scholar
  21. Coenen, C. (2007). Utopian Aspects of the Debate on Converging Technologies. In G. Banse (Ed.), Assessing Societal Implications of Converging Technological Development (pp. 141–174). Berlin: Edition Sigma.Google Scholar
  22. Coenen, C. (2014). Transhumanism and Its Genesis: The Shaping of Human Enhancement Discourse by Visions of the Future. UMANA. MENTE Journal of Philosophical Studies, 7(26), 35–58.Google Scholar
  23. Cohen, P., & Feigenbaum, E. (2014). The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  24. Copeland, J. (2015). Artificial Intelligence: A Philosophical Introduction. London: John Wiley & Son.Google Scholar
  25. Dart, T. (2018, October 2). ‘Keep Robot Brothels Out of Houston’: Sex Doll Company Faces Pushback. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  26. Del Casino, V. (2016). Social Geographies II. Progress in Human Geography, 40(6), 846–855. Scholar
  27. Dickel, S., & Schrape, J. (2017a). The Logic of Digital Utopianism. Nanoethics, 11(1), 47–58. Scholar
  28. Dickel, S., & Schrape, J. (2017b). The Renaissance of Techno-Utopianism as a Challenge for Responsible Innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 4(2), 289–294. Scholar
  29. Dvorsky, G. (2008). Better Living Through Transhumanism. Journal Evolution & Technology, 19(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  30. Ferrari, F., Paladino, M., & Jetten, J. (2016). Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions: Anthropomorphic Appearance in Social Robots as a Threat to Human Distinctiveness. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(2), 287–302. Scholar
  31. Fox, S. (2017). Beyond AI: Multi-Intelligence (MI) Combining Natural and Artificial Intelligences in Hybrid Beings and Systems. Technologies, 5(3), 38.Google Scholar
  32. Fukuyama, F. (1999). The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstruction of Social Order. London: Profile.Google Scholar
  33. Fuller. (2018). The Posthuman and the Transhuman as Alternative Mappings of the Space of Political Possibility. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(2), 151. Scholar
  34. Fuller, S., & Lipinska, V. (2014). The Proactionary Imperative: A Foundation for Transhumanism. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Gagnon, P. (2012). The Problem of Trans-Humanism in the Light of Philosophy and Theology. In J. Stump & A. Padgett (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity (pp. 393–405). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Gelles, D. (2009). Immortality 2.0. The Futurist, 43(1), 34–41.Google Scholar
  37. Geraci, R. (2016). A Tale of Two Futures: Techno-Eschatology in the US and India. Social Compass, 63(3), 319–334. Scholar
  38. Goldberg, K. (2015). Robotics: Countering Singularity Sensationalism. Nature, 526(7573), 320.Google Scholar
  39. Grassie, W. J., & Hansell, G. (2010). H±Transhumanism and Its Critics. Philadelphia: Metanexus Institute.Google Scholar
  40. Gruenwald, O. (2013). The Dystopian Imagination: The Challenge of Techno-Utopia. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 25(1/2), 1.Google Scholar
  41. Guckelsberger, C., Salge, C., & Colton, S. (2017). Addressing the “Why?” in Computational Creativity: A Non-Anthropocentric, Minimal Model of Intentional Creative Agency.Google Scholar
  42. Hanson, R. (2016). The Age of Em: Work, Love, and Life When Robots Rule the Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Harris, M. S. (2014). The Myth of Techno-Transcendence: The Rhetoric of the Singularity. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  44. Hauskeller, M. (2012). Reinventing Cockaigne. Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 39–47. Scholar
  45. Havlík, V. (2018). The Naturalness of Artificial Intelligence from the Evolutionary Perspective. AI & Society. Scholar
  46. Hernández-Orallo, J. (2017). The Measure of All Minds: Evaluating Natural and Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Hughes, J. (2010). Contradictions from the Enlightenment Roots of Transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35(6), 622–640. Scholar
  48. Hurlburt, J., & Tirosh-Samuelson, H. (2016). Perfecting Human Futures: Transhuman Visions and Technological Imaginations. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Huxley, J. (2015). Transhumanism. Ethics in Progress, 6(1), 12–16.Google Scholar
  50. Igrek, A. (2015). Beyond Malaise and Euphoria: Herbrechter’s Critical Post-Humanism. Comparative and Continental Philosophy, 7(1), 92–97. Scholar
  51. Iuga, I. (2016). Transhumanism Between Human Enhancement and Technological Innovation. Symposion, 3(1), 79–88.Google Scholar
  52. Jameson, S. M. (2018). Dystopian Film on the Edge of a Food Coma. New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film, 16(1), 43–56.Google Scholar
  53. Jotterand, F. (2010). Human Dignity and Transhumanism: Do Anthro-Technological Devices Have Moral Status? The American Journal of Bioethics, 10(7), 45–52.Google Scholar
  54. Koch, T. (2010). Enhancing Who? Enhancing What? Ethics, Bioethics, and Transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35(6), 685–699. Scholar
  55. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Penguin.Google Scholar
  56. Laurie, T. (2015). Becoming-Animal Is a Trap for Humans: Deleuze and Guattari in Madagascar. In H. Stark & J. Roffe (Eds.), Deleuze and the Non/Human (pp. 142–162). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Lee, T. K. I. (2016). Cyberspace and the Post-Cyberpunk Decentering of Anthropocentrism. Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  58. Lindemann, G. (2015). Social Interaction with Robots: Three Questions. AI & Society, 31(4), 573–575. Scholar
  59. Makridakis, S. (2017). The Forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) Revolution: Its Impact on Society and Firms. Futures, 90, 46–60. Scholar
  60. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Bisson, P., & Marrs, A. (2013). Disruptive Technologies: Advances That Will Transform Life, Business, and the Global Economy. San Francisco: McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
  61. Markoff, J. (2016). Machines of Loving Grace: The Quest for Common Ground Between Humans and Robots. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  62. Marques, E. (2013). I Sing the Body Dystopic: Utopia and Posthuman Corporeality in PD Jame’s The Children of Men. Ilha Do Desterro, (65), 29–48.Google Scholar
  63. Mercer, C., & Trothen, T. (2014). Religion and Transhumanism: The Unknown Future of Human Enhancement: The Unknown Future of Human Enhancement. Santa Barbara: ABL-CIO.Google Scholar
  64. More, M. (2013). The Philosophy of Transhumanism. In M. More & N. Vita-More (Eds.), The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future (pp. 3–17). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  65. Murillo, A. P. (2014). Data at Risk Initiative: Examining and Facilitating the Scientific Process in Relation to Endangered Data. Data Science Journal, 12, 207–219.Google Scholar
  66. Nilsson, N. (2014). Principles of Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kauffman.Google Scholar
  67. Oh, C., Lee, T., Kim, Y., Park, S., & Suh, B. (2017). Us vs. Them: Understanding Artificial Intelligence Technophobia Over the Google DeepMind Challenge Match. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google Scholar
  68. Ornella, A. (2015). Towards a ‘Circuit of Technological Imaginaries’ A Theoretical Approach. In D. Pezzoli-Olgiati (Ed.), Religion in Cultural Imaginary – Explorations in Visual and Material Practices (pp. 9–38). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  69. Ortega, F. (2009). The Cerebral Subject and the Challenge of Neurodiversity. Biosocieties, 4(4), 425–445. Scholar
  70. Papacharissi, Z. (2018). A Networked Self and Human Augmentics, Artificial Intelligence, Sentience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Papadopoulos, D. (2010). Insurgent Posthumanism. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 10(2), 134–151.Google Scholar
  72. Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2010). Moral Transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35(6), 656–669. Scholar
  73. Peters, T. (2005). The Soul of Trans-Humanism. Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 44(4), 381–395. Scholar
  74. Poggiali, L. (2017). Digital Futures and Analogue Pasts? Citizenship and Ethnicity in Techno-Utopian Kenya. Africa, 87(2), 253–277. Scholar
  75. Porpora, D. (2017). Dehumanization in Theory: Anti-Humanism, Non-Humanism, Post-Humanism, and Trans-Humanism. Journal of Critical Realism, 16(4), 353–367. Scholar
  76. Raz, A. (2009). Eugenic Utopias/Dystopias, Reprogenetics, and Community Genetics. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(4), 602–616. Scholar
  77. Richardson, K. (2016). The Asymmetrical ‘Relationship’: Parallels Between Prostitution and the Development of Sex Robots. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 45(3), 290–293.Google Scholar
  78. Roussel, M. (2018). Toward a Post-Human Era. Architecture Philosophy, 3(1), 77–93.Google Scholar
  79. Rus, D. (2015). The Robots Are Coming. Foreign Affairs, 94(4), 2–6.Google Scholar
  80. Russell, S., Dewey, D., & Tegmark, M. (2015). Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence. AI Magazine, 36(4), 105–114.Google Scholar
  81. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  82. Saage, R. (2013). New Man in Utopian and Transhumanist Perspective. European Journal of Futures Research, 1(1).
  83. Sauppé, S., & Mutlu, B. (2015). The Social Impact of a Robot Co-Worker in Industrial Settings. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3613–3622): ACM.Google Scholar
  84. Silberman, S. (2015). Neurotribes: The Legacy of Autism and the Future of Neurodiversity. Penguin.Google Scholar
  85. Sirius, R. U., & Cornell, J. (2015). Transcendence: The Disinformation Encyclopedia of Transhumanism and the Singularity. Red Wheel Weiser.Google Scholar
  86. Steels, L., & Brooks, R. (2018). The Artificial Life Route to Artificial Intelligence: Building Embodied, Situated Agents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  87. Suzuki, T., Yamanda, S., Kanda, T., & Nomura, T. (2015). Influence of Social Avoidance and Distress on People’s Preferences for Robots as Daily Life Communication Partners. In New Friends.Google Scholar
  88. Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Knopf.Google Scholar
  89. Thorndike, E. (2017). Animal Intelligence: Experimental Studies. Routledge.Google Scholar
  90. Verdoux, P. (2009). Transhumanism, Progress and the Future. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 20(2), 49–69.Google Scholar
  91. Višňovský, E. (2015). Homo Biotechnologicus. Human Affairs, 25(2).
  92. Wang, P., Liu, K., & Dougherty, Q. (2018). Conceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Singularity. Information, 9(4), 79.Google Scholar
  93. Wolfe, C. (2010). What Is Posthumanism? Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  94. Woolley, S., & Howard, P. (2016). Automation, Algorithms, and Politics| Political Communication, Computational Propaganda, and Autonomous Agents – Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 10(9). Retrieved from
  95. Yuen, J. (2018, September 9). ‘NICE SKIN’: What It’s Like Inside a Sex Doll Rental Business. Toronto Sun.Google Scholar
  96. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of EssexColchesterUK

Personalised recommendations