Advertisement

Exploring the Mediating Role of Interactivity Between Content Engagement and Business Performance in a Mobile-Marketing Strategy: A Quantitative Research in a Business-to-Business Context

  • Gerasimos Ntarlas
  • Despina A. Karayanni
Conference paper
  • 43 Downloads
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

M-commerce escalates at exponential rates, worldwide. Through a mobile device, i.e., smartphone/iPhone/android/tablet/iPad, we may buy almost everything at any time and any place. Companies may perform 360° marketing, integrating communication messages in a network context, through social media and interactive virtual stores, on a 24/7/360 basis. Network, interactive communication becomes an asset, on this one, providing add-value and new market expansion opportunities for its business users. In this paper we focus on content engagement and interactivity that, according to marketing literature, when involved properly in m-commerce strategies, may provide competitive advantage. To this end, we based upon extensive literature review and, especially, the UTAUT model of new ITs’ adoption. The preliminary research resulted in the formation of a quantitative research instrument, which was disseminated through the LinkedIn, used as the research field. The convenience sample comprised 181 social media and Internet/Mobile marketing managers working at respective Greek companies, that volunteer to participate, yielding 26.3% response. Research hypotheses were tested using SEM analysis. The findings imply that interactivity may have moderating effects in the relationship between content engagement in mobile b-to-b strategy and company performance, in terms of competitiveness, profitability and market expansion. Implications, limitations and future research are also discussed.

Keywords

M-commerce Business-to-business m-marketing UTAUT model Interactivity Content engagement Profitability Competitiveness Market expansion Mediated effects of interactivity 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Lu EH-C, Lee WC, Tseng VSM (2011) A framework for personal mobile commerce pattern mining and prediction. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 24:769–782.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2011.65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manneh M (2017) The influence of social media on e-commerce: fast fashion multinational companiesGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mahatanankoon P, Wen PJ, Lim B (2005) Consumer-based m-commerce: exploring consumer perception of mobile applications. Comput Stand Interfaces 27:347–357.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2004.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta M, Gupta A, Kumar P (2018) Urbanization and biodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi – the case study of Delhi, India. Rev Biol Trop 66:1547–1558.  https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v66i4.33216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ahmad NS, Musa R, Harun MHM (2016) The impact of social media content marketing (SMCM) towards brand health. Procedia Econ Financ 37:331–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christodoulides G (2009) Branding in the post-internet era. Mark Theory 2009(9):141–144.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593108100071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Avlonitis GJ, Karayanni DA (2000) The impact of internet use on business-to-business marketing: examples from American and European companies. Ind Mark Manag 29:441–459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00071-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karayanni DA, Baltas D (2003) Web site characteristics and business performance: some evidence from international business-to-business organizations. Mark Intell Plan 21:105–114.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500310465416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abdullah F, Ward R (2016) Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Comput Hum Behav 56:238–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jeon H, Jang J, Barrett EB (2017) Linking website interactivity to consumer behavioral intention in an online travel community: the mediating role of utilitarian value and online trust. J Qual Assur Hosp Tour 18:125–148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2016.1169473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marzuki MII et al (2016) The role of perceived interactivity, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and perceived enjoyment toward intention to use online mapping service applications. Int Acad Res J Bus Technol 2:135–139Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grégoire Y, Laufer D, Tripp TM (2010) A comprehensive model of customer direct and indirect revenge: understanding the effects of perceived greed and customer power. J Acad Mark Sci 38:738–758.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0186-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hennig-Thurau T et al (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? J Interact Mark 18:38–52.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jensen Schau H, Gilly MC (2003) We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. J Consum Res 30:385–404. 0093-5301/2004/3003-0005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steimle J (2014) What is content marketing. Forbes [Online]. http://www.forbes.com/sites/joshsteimle/2014/09/19/what-is-content-marketing
  17. 17.
    Kilgour M, Sasser SL, Larke RT (2015) The social media transformation process: curating content into strategy. Corp Commun Int J 20:326–343.  https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2014-0046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen Z, Dubinsky AJ (2003) A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e-commerce: a preliminary investigation. Psychol Mark 20:323–347.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Song JH, Zinkhan GM (2008) Determinants of perceived web site interactivity. J Mark 72:99–113.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.2.99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang TK et al (2018) How does social media interactivity affect brand loyalty? In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii international conference on system sciencesGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Changal KR (2005) Effect of perceived interactivity of online stores on purchase intentionGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McMillan SJ, Hwang JS (2002) Measures of perceived interactivity: an exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. J Advert 31:29–42.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schamari J, Schaefers T (2015) Leaving the home turf: how brands can use webcare on consumer-generated platforms to increase positive consumer engagement. J Interact Mark 30:20–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2014.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cui N, Wang T, Xu S (2010) The influence of social presence on consumers’ perceptions of the interactivity of web sites. J Interact Advert 11:36–49.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2010.10722176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hudson S et al (2015) The effects of social media on emotions, brand relationship quality, and word of mouth: an empirical study of music festival attendees. Tour Manag 47:68–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barwise P, Farley JU (2005) The state of interactive marketing in seven countries: interactive marketing comes of age. J Interact Mark 19:67–80.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van Noort G, Voorveld HAM, Van Reijmersdal E (2012) Interactivity in brand web sites: cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers’ online flow experience. J Interact Mark 26:223–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2011.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Trusov M, Bucklin RE, Pauwels K (2009) Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site. J Mark 73:90–102.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.90 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu Y (2006) Word of mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. J Mark 70:74–89.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.3.74 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vallaster C, Lindgreen A (2011) Corporate brand strategy formation: brand actors and the situational context for a business-to-business brand. Ind Mark Manag 40:1133–1143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Iglesias O, Nicholas I, Alfaro M (2017) The organic view of the brand: a brand value co-creation model. Palgrave Macmillan, London.  https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2013.8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang J-L, Wang HZ, Gaskin J, Hawk S (2017) The mediating roles of upward social comparison and self-esteem and the moderating role of social comparison orientation in the association between social networking site usage and subjective well-being. Front Psychol 8:771.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerasimos Ntarlas
    • 1
  • Despina A. Karayanni
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations