Advertisement

Participatory Culture and Tourist Experience: Promoting Destinations Through YouTube

  • Arabela BriciuEmail author
  • Victor-Alexandru Briciu
Conference paper
  • 38 Downloads
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

Social media tools are viewed as important sources for the tourism sector and different types of consumers and travellers. This article presents the role and the impact of YouTube, as the main video sharing solution in the online environment, for the development of what is called prosumer, the user which generates, circulates and consumes online knowledge and being part of the participatory culture. The goal of this research is to investigate the extent to which social media and YouTube in particular appear to be part of the spreadable media phenomenon, the capacity of the information to be shared among users. The study used a research design by selecting the first 100 video clips promoted by YouTube and addressing the theme of Bran Castle (also known as Dracula Castle) from Braşov, Transylvania region in Romania, uploaded by different categories of users. For the analysis of the results, this paper used elements of descriptive statistics from YouTube and methods of quantitative content analysis, regarding the YouTube video characteristics such as the frequencies of views, comments, appreciations (likes, dislikes), channel subscribers etc. This study shows that YouTube is considered to be important for the development of the tourist industry as it provides travellers with new practices for choosing their destination after viewing video materials.

Keywords

Participatory culture YouTube Social media 

References

  1. 1.
    World Travel & Tourism Council (2019) Travel & tourism economical impact 2019 world. https://www.wttc.org/-/media/files/reports/economic-impact-research/regions-2019/world 2019.pdf
  2. 2.
    ITB Berlin (2019) World travel trends 2018/2019, prepared by IPK International. https://www.itb-kongress.de/media/itbk/itbk_dl_all/ITB_2019_WTTR_Factsheets_ALLE_ Web_4.pdf
  3. 3.
    Palfrey J, Gasser U (2008) Born digital: understanding the first generation of digital natives. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Serazio M (2015) Selling (digital) millennials: the social construction and technological bias of a consumer generation. Telev New Media 16:599–615.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476413491015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tapscott D (2009) Grown up digital: how the net generation is changing your world. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hays S, Page SJ, Buhalis D (2013) Social media as a destination marketing tool: its use by national tourism organisations. Curr Issue Tour 16:211–239.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2012.662215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Tuten TL (2008) Advertising 2.0: social media marketing in a web 2.0 world. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boyd D (2009) Social media is here to stay… now what? Microsoft Research TechFest, Redmond, WA. https://www.danah.org/papers/talks/MSRTechFest2009.html
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Fotis J, Buhalis D, Rossides N (2011) Social media impact on holiday travel planning: the case of the Russian and the FSU markets. Int J Online Mark 1(4):1–19.  https://doi.org/10.4018/ijom.2011100101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwemmer C, Ziewiecki S (2018) Social media sellout: the increasing role of product promotion on YouTube. Social Media Soc 4:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118786720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    YouTube.com Competitive analysis, marketing mix and traffic. https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/youtube.com
  14. 14.
    Burgess J, Green J (2009) YouTube: online video and participatory culture. Polity Press, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jenkins H (2006) Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grossberg L (1992) Is there a fan in the house?: The affective sensibility of fandom. In: Lewis LA (ed) The adoring audience: fan culture and popular media. Routledge, London, pp 50–68Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sweetman P (2004) Tourists and travellers? “Subcultures”, reflexive identities and neo-tribal sociality. In: Bennett A, Kahn-Harris K (eds) After subculture: critical studies in contemporary youth culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 79–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Green J, Jenkins H (2009) The moral economy of Web 2.0: audience research and convergence culture. In: Holt J, Perren A (eds) Media industries: history, theory, and method. Blackwell, Malden, pp 213–225Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Larabie CL (2011) Participatory culture and the hidden costs of sharing. McMaster J Commun 7:66–88Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jenkins H, Ford S, Green J (2013) Spreadable media – creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reino S, Hay B (2016) The use of YouTube as a tourism marketing tool. Travel and tourism research association: advancing tourism research globally, vol 69. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/ttra/2011/Visual/69
  22. 22.
    Xiang Z, Gretzel U (2010) Role of social media in online travel information search. Tour Manag 31:179–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nechita F, Demeter R, Briciu V-A, Kavoura A, Varelas S (2019) Analysing projected destination images versus visitor-generated visual content in Brasov, Transylvania. In: Kavoura A, Kefallonitis E, Giovanis A (eds) Strategic innovative marketing and tourism. Springer, Cham, pp 613–622.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12453-3_70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Briciu V-A, Nechita F, Demeter R, Kavoura A (2019) Minding the gap between perceived and projected destination image by using information and communication platforms and software. Int J Comput Methods Herit Sci 3:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCMHS.2019070101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Candrea AD, Ispas A, Untaru EN, Nechita F (2016) Marketing the Count’s way: how Dracula’s myth can revive Romanian tourism. Transilvania University of Brașov 9:83–90Google Scholar
  26. 26.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Transilvania University of BrașovBrașovRomania

Personalised recommendations