Leveraging Quality of Service and Cost in Cyber-Physical Systems Design

  • Christos KotronisEmail author
  • Anargyros Tsadimas
  • Mara Nikolaidou
  • Dimosthenis Anagnostopoulos
  • George Dimitrakopoulos
  • Abbes Amira
  • Faycal Bensaali
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11819)


Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) comprise multiple cyberparts, physical processes, and human participants (end-users) that affect them, and vice versa. During the design of such systems, it is critical for the designer to take into account the end-user-perceived quality of provided services, as well as their cost, and integrate them into the CPSs; striking a satisfactory balance between quality and affordability is critical to system acceptance. In this work, we propose a model-based approach, using the Systems Modeling Language (SysML), to explore system design, encapsulating Quality of Service (QoS) and cost aspects, as system requirements, into a core model. Via this approach, the designer can define the system structure, configure it, measure and evaluate the quality, while analyzing cost, and find the best solution(s) for a correct design. As a use case, this approach is applied to a healthcare CPS, namely the Remote Elderly Monitoring System (REMS). In that context, managing REMS QoS and cost requirements, can contribute to an effective system design and implementation, enhancing the end-user satisfaction.


Cyber-Physical Systems Model-based design SysML Quality of Service Cost analysis Remote Elderly Monitoring 



The authors wish to acknowledge Qatar National Research Fund project EMBIoT (Proj. No. NPRP 9-114-2-055) project, under the auspices of which the work presented in this paper has been carried out.


  1. 1.
    Baig, M.M., Gholamhosseini, H.: Smart health monitoring systems: an overview of design and modeling. J. Med. Syst. 37(2), 98 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brauner, P., Valdez, A.C., et al.: On studying human factors in complex cyber-physical systems. In: Mensch und Computer 2016-Workshopband (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broy, M., Schmidt, A.: Challenges in engineering cyber-physical systems. Computer 47(2), 70–72 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dillon, T., Potdar, V., Singh, J., Talevski, A.: Cyber-physical systems: providing Quality of Service (QoS) in a heterogeneous systems-of-systems environment. In: 5th Digital Ecosystems and Technologies Conference, pp. 330–335. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friedenthal, S., Moore, A., Steiner, R.: A Practical Guide to SysML: The Systems Modeling Language. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    García-Valls, M., et al.: Pragmatic cyber physical systems design based on parametric models. J. Syst. Softw. 144, 559–572 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haque, S.A., Aziz, S.M., Rahman, M.: Review of cyber-physical system in healthcare. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 10(4), 217–415 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hehenberger, P., Vogel-Heuser, B., et al.: Design, modelling, simulation and integration of cyber physical systems: methods and applications. Comput. Ind. 82, 273–289 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ISO: IEC 25000 software and system engineering-software product quality requirements and evaluation (square)-guide to square (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jensen, J.C., Chang, D.H., Lee, E.A.: A model-based design methodology for cyber-physical systems. In: 2011 7th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, pp. 1666–1671. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kotronis, C., Nikolaidou, M., et al.: A model-based approach for managing criticality requirements in e-health IoT systems. In: IEEE 13th Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE). IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kotronis, C., Routis, I., et al.: A model-based approach for the design of cyber-physical human systems emphasizing human concerns. In: IEEE International Congress on Internet of Things (2019, to be presented)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Merino Laso, P., Brosset, D., Puentes, J.: Monitoring approach of cyber-physical systems by quality measures. In: Magno, M., Ferrero, F., Bilas, V. (eds.) S-CUBE 2016. LNICST, vol. 205, pp. 105–117. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, Y., Peng, Y., et al.: Review on cyber-physical systems. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 4(1), 27–40 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Monisha, K., Rajasekhara Babu, M.: A novel framework for healthcare monitoring system through cyber-physical system. In: Internet of Things and Personalized Healthcare Systems. SAST, pp. 21–36. Springer, Singapore (2019). Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E.: Cloud-based cyber-physical systems and quality of services. TQM J. 28(5), 704–733 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Object Management Group - SysML: System Modeling Language (2018).
  18. 18.
    Sanislav, T., Miclea, L.: Cyber-physical systems-concept, challenges and research areas. J. Control Eng. Appl. Inform. 14(2), 28–33 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thales Defense & Security, Inc.: Design considerations for size, weight, and power constrained radios. In: 2006 Software Defined Radio Technical Conference and Product Exposition (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zheng, C., Le Duigou, J., et al.: Multidisciplinary integration during conceptual design process: a survey on design methods of cyber-physical systems. In: DS 84: 14th International Design Conference, pp. 1625–1634 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christos Kotronis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anargyros Tsadimas
    • 1
  • Mara Nikolaidou
    • 1
  • Dimosthenis Anagnostopoulos
    • 1
  • George Dimitrakopoulos
    • 1
  • Abbes Amira
    • 2
  • Faycal Bensaali
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Informatics and TelematicsHarokopio UniversityAthensGreece
  2. 2.College of EngineeringQatar UniversityDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations