Blockchain-Enabled Participatory Incentives for Crowdsourced Mesh Networks

  • Elena San MiguelEmail author
  • Roxane TimmermanEmail author
  • Sergio MosqueraEmail author
  • Emmanouil DimogerontakisEmail author
  • Felix FreitagEmail author
  • Leandro NavarroEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11819)


Crowdsourced mesh networks are built, maintained and used by several participants that cooperate to provide and consume connectivity. Providers of infrastructure want to get compensation for their investments and earn tokens; users or consumers want the network to expand for improving the coverage of connectivity and stability. How do we collect funds from consumers and distribute them to providers, guaranteeing satisfaction of every participant? For that, we need of a system that coordinates the flow of economic value in mesh networks in a way that is not only transparent, automated, decentralized and secure, but also beneficial to all. We designed a new economic protocol called Fair to compensate providers for their investments. The key point of our model is that each provider will be paid with different prices for the forwarded traffic: the more devices a provider has, the higher its price/MB forwarded is, up to a certain limit. We implemented the model using MeshDApp, a local blockchain platform for mesh networks. Simulations show how our proposal ensures a win-win situation where the network grows and the providers are compensated for their investment. Also, continuous growth is incentivized while centralization due to few large providers controlling the network is avoided.


Pricing Mesh networks Blockchain Crowdsourcing 


  1. 1.
    Micholia, P., et al.: Community networks and sustainability: a survey of perceptions, practices, and proposed solutions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 20, 3581–3606 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baig, R., Dalmau, L., Roca, R., Navarro, L., Freitag, F., Sathiaseelan, A.: Making community networks economically sustainable, the experience. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Workshop on Global Access to the Internet for All, GAIA 2016, pp. 31–36. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Selimi, M., Rao, A., Ali, A., Navarro, L., Sathiaseelan, A.: Towards blockchain-enabled wireless mesh networks, April 2018Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mesh, A.: Althea: an incentivized mesh network protocol.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    AmmbrTech SRL. Ammbr network.
  7. 7.
    Castro, I., Panda, A., Raghavan, B., Shenker, S., Gorinsky, S.: Route bazaar: automatic interdomain contract negotiation. In: 15th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems (HotOS XV), Kartause Ittingen, Switzerland. USENIX Association (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lai, K., Rasmusson, L., Adar, E., Sorkin, S., Zhang, L., Huberman, B.: Tycoon: an implementation of a distributed, market-based resource allocation system. Multiagent Grid Syst. 1, 12 (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Request Network. A decentralized network for payment requests.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitat Politecnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Ecole Centrale de MarseilleMarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations