Advertisement

The Multiplicity of Multistabilities: Turning Multistability into a Multistable Concept

Chapter
  • 155 Downloads
Part of the Philosophy of Engineering and Technology book series (POET, volume 33)

Abstract

The concept of multistability is pertinent today in our technology-intensive world for its ability to indicate how a given technology has different meanings to different people at different times. In this chapter I claim that multistability should be subjected to its own principles, and hence it should acquire the plural form of multistabilities. The various usages and implementations of the notion are placed along an axis according to the number of stabilities and the goals of the analysis. When scientists study a multistable phenomenon, they collect data from several sources to reach one “truth.” This is the “modern scientific” region. Designers and other material culture specialists produce a high number of stabilities. This is the “modern evolutionary” region, inspired by Darwinian evolution. It is applicable to fashion items, cellphones models and street benches, to name a few. Lastly, innovators—may they be engineers, designers, or artists—look for numerous stabilities of a given phenomenon, whose collection may yield a new meta-stability. This is the “postmodern” region. The last region is applicable to sustainability, urging us to exceed the “climate change” and “global warming” phrases, and take into account other aspects such as deforestation, acidification of the oceans, etc.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on a paper presented in the 4S conference in Denver, Colorado (USA) in November 2015. Thanks to the postphenomenology community for enabling me to present this paper in one of the postphenomenology panels, for their good comments, and for their encouragement which helped me to develop these ideas into this chapter.

References

  1. Antonov, Alexander Alexandrovich. (2011). Structure of the multiverse. British Journal of Science, 2(2), 51–60.Google Scholar
  2. Barnet, Belinda. (2004). Technical machines and evolution. CTheory, 3–16.Google Scholar
  3. Basalla, George. (1988). The evolution of technology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Forss, Anette. (2012). Cells and the (imaginary) patient: The multistable practitioner-technology-cell interface in the cytology laboratory. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 15(3), 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hasse, Cathrine. (2015). Multistable roboethics. In Jan Kyrre Berg Friis & Robert P. Crease (Eds.), Technoscience and Postphenomenology: The Manhattan papers (pp. 169–188). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, Martin. (1977). The question concerning technology. In The question concerning technology, and other essays (William Lovitt, Trans.). New York, NY: Garland Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Ihde, Don. (1986). Experimental phenomenology: An introduction. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington, IN/Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. ———. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking University lectures. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. (2010). Heidegger’s technologies: Postphenomenological perspectives. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  11. ———. (2012). Experimental phenomenology: Multistabilities, 2nd ed. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. (2016a). Husserl’s missing technologies. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. (2016b). Reply to my interlocutors. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 20(2), 168–176.Google Scholar
  14. Irwin, Stacey O. (2014). Technological reciprocity with a cell phone. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 18(1/2), 10–19.Google Scholar
  15. Michelfelder, Diane. (2014). Driving while beagleated. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 18(1/2), 117–132.Google Scholar
  16. Rosenberger, Robert. (2008). Perceiving other planets: Bodily experience, interpretation, and the Mars Orbiter camera. Human Studies, 31, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. (2014). Multistability and the agency of mundane artifacts: From speed bumps to subway benches. Human Studies, 37, 369–392.Google Scholar
  18. ———. (2016). Husserl’s missing multistability. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 20(2), 153–167.Google Scholar
  19. ———. (2017). Notes on a nonfoundational phenomenology of technology. Foundations of Science, 22(3), 471–494.Google Scholar
  20. Rosenberger, Robert, & Peter-Paul Verbeek. (2015). A field guide to postphenomenology. In Robert Rosenberger & Peter-Paul Verbeek (Eds.), Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human-technology relations (pp. 9–41). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  21. Stiegler, Bernard. (1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of Epimetheus (Richard Beardsworth & George Collins, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Verbeek, Peter-Paul. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wellner, Galit. (2014). Multi-attention and the Horcrux Logic: Justifications for talking on the cell phone while driving. Techné Research in Philosophy and Technology, 18(1/2), 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. (2015). A postphenomenological inquiry of cell phones: Genealogies, meanings, and becoming. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  25. Whyte, Kyle P. (2015). What is multistability? A theory of the keystone concept of postphenomenological research. In Jan Kyrre Berg O. Friis & Robert P. Crease (Eds.), Technoscience and postphenomenology: The Manhattan papers (pp. 69–81). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  26. Zwier, Jochem, Vincent Blok, & Pieter Lemmens. (2016). Phenomenology and the empirical turn: A phenomenological analysis of postphenomenology. Philosophy & Technology, 29(4), 313–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NB School of DesignTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations