Advertisement

Risk Based Design with Goal Based Standards and Safety Level Approach. An Example Based on a Spanish Fishing Vessel Fleet

  • M. J. Núñez-SánchezEmail author
  • Luis Pérez-Rojas
Conference paper
  • 206 Downloads

Abstract

Due to the quick advance in technology there is already a need to develop designs considering risk from a formal point of view to escape from prescriptive regulatory approaches and allow flexibility. In order to do this, there is a benefit in providing the current regulations with functional requirements with the additional benefit to set the frame to develop a structure providing rules for rules. It is proposed that a structure with goals, functional requirements and open and shared high-level risk models are developed at the level of the Administration that can be later complemented with low level risk models. In order to put this into practice a complete example of goal-based standard embedded in risk models was developed leading to more rational, cost effective and explicit regulations.

Keywords

Alternative design Risk Goal Based Standards Safety level approach 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Pitchanat Khomsupphawit for the continuous support.

Disclaimer

The content of this paper does not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Maritime Safety Agency. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in this paper lie entirely with the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Núñez, M.: La construcción de buques basada en objetivos y el enfoque del nivel de seguridad en el entorno normativo. Una nueva oportunidad para la industria marítima española. Ingeniería Naval (943), 77–83 (2016). ISSN 0020-1073Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Núñez, M.: Towards a new SOLAS Convention: a transformation of the ship safety regulatory framework Transactions RINA. Int. J. Maritime Eng. 158(Part A2), A139–A146 (2016). ISSN 1479-8751Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Intertanko, GBS Goal-Based Standards. www.intertanko.com/upload/ISTEC-5-6GBS-Little.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2018
  4. 4.
    Papanikolaou, A., et al.: Risk-Based Ship Design Methods, Tools and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89042-3Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    IMO, MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.12/Rev2 Revised guidelines for formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making processGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    IMO. MSC.1/Circ. 1394/Rev.1 Generic Guidelines for Developing Imo Goal-Based StandardsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kristiansen, S.: Maritime transportation. Safety Management and Risk Analysis. Capítulo 2 y 12. Elsevier (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Núñez, M.: Establecimiento y evaluación de un nivel de seguridad de la flota pesquera nacional de menos de 24 m de eslora (2017). Chapters 11 and 12Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gobierno de España, Ministerio de Fomento, RD 543/2007 de 27 de abril, por el que se determinan las normas de seguridad y de prevención de la contaminación a cumplir por los buques pesqueros menores de 24 metros de eslora (L). «BOE» núm. 131, de 1 de junio de 2007, páginas 23806 a 23891, 86 p.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gobierno de España, Ministerio de Fomento, RD 1185/2006, de 16 de octubre, por el que se aprueba el Reglamento por el que se regulan las radiocomunicaciones marítimas a bordo de los buques civiles españoles. BOE. núm. 261, de 1 de noviembre de 2006, páginas 37906 a 37944, 39 p.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    NATO Standardization Office (NSO) © NATO/OTAN NATO Standard, ANEP-77, Naval Ship Code Edition F Version 1, August 201Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Doctor Ingeniero Naval y OceánicoUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations