Advertisement

Abstract

Natural gas is an alternative energy to oil, which has gained attention and investments in the offshore market recently. For exploration, storage and transport, due to its unique characteristics, it requires to be processed at Floating Liquefied Natural Gas platforms (FLNG). The main differences from the traditional oil FPSOs platforms are the presence of a larger processing plant and of thermal insulated specialized tanks, both intrinsically related to the need to liquefy natural gas at extremely low temperature. Besides the challenges of installing an LNG processing plant onto a floating structure, the FLNG design process presents several challenges due to maritime requirements (stability and structural) as well as to operational characteristics. The present work, based on a parametric synthesis model development, aims to compare single viable FLNG platforms obtained by numerical simulations of different dimensional and arrangement parameters or cargo and ballast conditions and evaluating its performance regarding production and storage capacity and operational downtime. Given a set of input parameters, varying for a range of typical values, the numerical program performs the FLNG design in agreement with established international rules considering topside layout, volume and weight distribution, cargo and ballast filled conditions, intact stability conditions, longitudinal and transversal structural specifications, and seakeeping analysis. The results are compared and analyzed for a typical production level and storage capacity, highlighting that the parametric model approach is usually applied to the conceptual design with the objective to provide basic performance indicators on viable solutions for the client’s decision process.

Keywords

FLNG Model test LNG tanks 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Frade Japão Petróleo Ltda for the financial support and for the motivation of this work.

References

  1. Veritas, D.N.: Rules for Classification of Floating LNG/LPG Production, Storage and Loading Units (DNV-OSS-103). DNV (2012)Google Scholar
  2. Newman, J.N.: Marine Hydrodynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Newman, J.N., Sclavounos, P.D.: The computation of wave loads on large offshore structures. In: 5th International Conference on the Behavior of Offshore Structures (BOSS), Trondheim, Norway (1988)Google Scholar
  4. Newman, J.N.: Wave effects on vessels with internal tanks. In: 20th International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies (IWWWFB), Spitsbergen, Norway (2005)Google Scholar
  5. Molin, B., Remy, F., Rigaud, S., de Jouette, Ch.: LNG-FPSO’s: frequency domain, coupled analysis of support and liquid cargo motions. In: 10th International Congress of International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean (IMAM), Greece (2002)Google Scholar
  6. Rocha, T.P., Dotta, R., Vieira, D.P., Mello, P.C.D., Malta, E.B., Nishimoto, K.: Experimental investigation on the influence of liquid cargo in floating vessels motions. In: OTC Brasil. Offshore Technology Conference (2015)Google Scholar
  7. Vieira, D.P., Lavieri, R.S., Rocha, T.P., Dotta, R., Rampazzo F., Nishimoto K.: A synthesis model for FLNG design. In: 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore & Arctic Engineering (OMAE), Busan, Korea (2016)Google Scholar
  8. Vieira, D.P., de Mello, P.C., Dotta, R., Nishimoto, K.: Experimental investigation on the influence of the liquid inside the tanks in the wave behavior of FLNG vessels in side-by-side offloading operations. Appl. Ocean Res. 74, 28–39 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. WAMIT Inc.: WAMIT User manual, Version 7.2 and 7.2PC (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel P. Vieira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kam Yu Kang
    • 1
  • Claudio M. P. Sampaio
    • 1
  1. 1.Numerical Offshore Tank, Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean EngineeringUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations