Research on the Financial Effectiveness of Alternative Water Supply Systems in European Countries

  • Agnieszka StecEmail author
Part of the Water Science and Technology Library book series (WSTL, volume 90)


Currently, the financial criterion is a decisive criterion in the process of making investment decisions. Taking this into account, a financial analysis was carried out for various variants of sanitary installations in single-family buildings located in selected cities in Europe. The research was carried out using the Life Cycle Cost methodology.


  1. Bakis N, Kagiouglou M, Aouad G, Amaratunga D, Kishk M, Al-Hajj A (2003) An integrated environment for life cycle costing in constructionGoogle Scholar
  2. Brigham E, Ehrhardt M (2008) Financial management. Theory and PRACTICE. South-Western Cengage Learning, Ohio, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Buildings… (2008) Buildings and constructed assets—Service life planning. Part 5: life cycle costing. ISO/DIS 15686-5.2. International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  4. Clift M (2003) Life-cycle costing in the construction sector. Sustainable building and construction. UNEP Industry and EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  5. Dell Isola A, Kirk S (1981) Life cycle costing for design professionals. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. DOE (2014) Life cycle cost handbook. Guidance for life cycle cost estimation and analysis. Office of acquisition and project management, U.S. Department of Energy, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  7. Epstein M (1996) Measuring corporate environmental performance. McGraw-Hill, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  8. Flanagan R, Norman G (1987) Life cycle costing: theory and practice, RICS. Surveyors Publications Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Flanagan R, Kendell A, Norman G, Robinson G (1987) Life cycle costing and risk management. Construction Management and Economics, No 5Google Scholar
  10. Fuller S, Petersen S (1996) Life cycle costing manual for the federal energy management program. NIST, Handbook, p 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gluch P, Baumann H (2004) The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making. Build Environ 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Góralczyk M, Kulczycka J (2003) LCNPV as a tool for evaluation of environment al investment in industrial Project. In: 2nd international symposium ILCDES 2003—Integrated life-time engineering of buildings and civil infrastructures, KuopioGoogle Scholar
  13. Haviland D (1978) Life cycle cost analysis. Using it in practice. AIAGoogle Scholar
  14. Kowalski Z, Kulczycka J, Góralczyk M (2007) Ekologiczna ocena cyklu życia procesów wytwórczych. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  15. Landres R (1996) Product assurance dictionary. Marlton Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Lang A (2007) Sensitivity analysis of life cycle cost calculation.
  17. Liaw C, Tsai Y (2004) Optimum storage volume of rooftop rain water harvesting systems for domestic use. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40:901–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Life Cycle Cost (LCC) (2011) Description of the tool and its parameters. Swedish Environmental Management CouncilGoogle Scholar
  19. Life cycle costing… (2007a) Life cycle costing (LCC) as a contribution to sustainable construction: a common methodology, Literature review.
  20. Life Cycle Costing… (2007b) Life cycle costing (LCC) as a contribution to sustainable construction: a common methodology.
  21. Life cycle costing… (2007c) Life cycle costing (LCC) as a contribution to sustainable construction, Guidance on the use of the LCC Methodology and its application in public procurement
  22. Military Handbook… (1983a) Military handbook, life cycle cost in navy acquisitions, MIL-HDBK-259Google Scholar
  23. Military Handbook… (1984a) Military handbook, life cycle cost model for defense material systems, MIL-HDBK-276-1Google Scholar
  24. Military Handbook… (1984b) Military handbook, life cycle cost model for defense material systems operating instructions, MIL-HDBK-276-2Google Scholar
  25. Morales-Pinzón T, Lurueña R, Rieradevall J, Gasol CM, Gabarrell X (2012) Financial feasibility and environmental analysis of potential rainwater harvesting systems: a case study in Spain. Resour Conserv Recycl 69:130–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pastusiak R (2003) Ocena efektywności inwestycji. CeDewu Sp. zoo, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  27. Rahman A, Dbais J, Imteaz M (2010) Sustainability of rainwater harvesting systems in multistorey residential buildings. Am J Appl Sci 3:889–898Google Scholar
  28. Rahman A, Keane J, Imteaz AM (2012) Rainwater harvesting in greater sydney: water savings, reliability and economic benefits. Resour Conserv Recycl 61:16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roebuck RM, Oltean-Dumbrava C, Tait S (2011) Whole life cost performance of domestic rainwater harvesting systems in the United Kingdom. Water Environ J 25:355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rogowski W (2004) Rachunek efektywności inwestycji. Oficyna Ekonomiczna, KrakówGoogle Scholar
  31. SAE (1999) Reliability and maintainability guideline for manufacturing machinery and equipment. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), M-110.2Google Scholar
  32. Silva C, Sousa V, Carvalho N (2015) Evaluation of rainwater harvesting in Portugal: application to single-family residences. Resour Conserv Recycl 94:21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Task Group 4 (2003) Life cycle costs in construction. Final Report.
  34. White G, Ostwald P (1976) Life cycle costing. Management AccountingGoogle Scholar
  35. Woodward D, Demirag I (1989) Life cycle costing. Career AccountantGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Department of Infrastructure and Water ManagementRzeszow University of TechnologyRzeszówPoland

Personalised recommendations