Advertisement

Are Decisions of Image Trustworthiness Contextual? A Pilot Study

  • Peter D. BruzaEmail author
  • Lauren Fell
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11690)

Abstract

This article documents an empirical pilot study conducted to determine whether decisions of image trustworthiness are contextual. Contextuality is an active area of investigation in quantum cognition, however there has been little compelling evidence of its presence in human information processing. A Bell scenario experimental design was employed which manipulated both content and representational features in order to minimize the difference in marginal probabilities across experimental conditions. In addition, participants were subjected to time pressure in order to promote more spontaneous decisions. Results revealed no significant differences in marginal probabilities, however, no evidence of contextuality was found. The study revealed a tension between the requirement for minimizing the difference in marginal probabilities and the need to produce the strong correlations required to empirically ascertain contextuality.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development (AOARD) grant: FA2386-17-1-4016 and the InterPARES Trust (https://interparestrust.org). Thanks to Abdul Obeid for his technical support.

References

  1. 1.
    Barrett, L.F., Tugade, M.M., Engle, R.W.: Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychol. Bull. 4(130), 553 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruza, P., Kitto, K., Ramm, B., Sitbon, L.: A probabilistic framework for analysing the compositionality of conceptual combinations. J. Math. Psychol. 67, 26–38 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cervantes, V., Dzhafarov, E.: Snow queen is evil and beautiful: experimental evidence for probabilistic contextuality in human choices. arXiv:1711.00418v2
  4. 4.
    Dzhafarov, E., Kujala, J.: Probabilistic contextuality in EPR/Bohm-type systems with signaling allowed. In: Dzhafarov, E. (ed.) Contextuality from Quantum Physics to Psychology, pp. 287–308. World Scientific Press, Singapore (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dzhafarov, E.N., Kujala, J.V.: Random variables recorded under mutually exclusive conditions: contextuality-by-default. In: Liljenström, H. (ed.) Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (IV). ACN, pp. 405–409. Springer, Dordrecht (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9548-7_57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dzhafarov, E., Zhang, R., Kujala, J.: Is there contextuality in behavioral and social systems? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 374(2058), 20150099 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fell, L., Bruza, P.D., Devitt, K., Oliver, G., Gladwell, M., Partridge, H.: The cognitive decision space of trust: an exploratory study of image trustworthiness and the propensity to deceive. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/102009/ (2016)
  8. 8.
    Jacoby, L., Kelley, C., Dywan, J.: Memory attributions. In: Roediger, H., Craik, F. (eds.) Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honour of Endel Tulving, pp. 391–422. Erlbaum, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kahneman, D.: A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am. Psychol. 9(58), 697 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kobus, D.A., Proctor, S., Holste, S.: Effects of experience and uncertainty during dynamic decision making. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 28(5), 275–290 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lipshitz, R., Klein, G., Orasanu, J., Salas, E.: Taking stock of naturalistic decision making. J. Behav. Decis. Making 14(5), 331–352 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lum, J.: Getty photographer terminated over altered golf photo. http://petapixel.com/2010/07/19/getty-photographer-terminated-over-altered-golf-photo/
  13. 13.
    Reber, R., Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N.: Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychol. Sci. 9(1), 45–48 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rugg, D.: Experiments in wording questions: II. Public Opinion Q. 1(5), 91 (1941)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shane, S., Goel, V.: Fake Russian facebook accounts bought \$100,000 in political ads. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/06/technology/facebook-russian-political-ads.html
  16. 16.
    Whittlesea, B.W.: Illusions of familiarity. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 19(6), 1235 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Whittlesea, B.W., Jacoby, L., Girard, K.: Illusions of immediate memory: evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. J. Mem. Lang. 29(6), 716–732 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information SystemsQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations