WEBLORS – A Personalized Web-Based Recommender System

  • Mohammad Belghis-ZadehEmail author
  • Hazra Imran
  • Maiga Chang
  • Sabine Graf
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11841)


Nowadays, personalization and adaptivity becomes more and more important in most systems. When it comes to education and learning, personalization can provide learners with better learning experiences by considering their needs and characteristics when presenting them with learning materials within courses in learning management systems. One way to provide students with more personal learning materials is to deliver personalized content from the web. However, due to information overload, finding relevant and personalized materials from the web remains a challenging task. This paper presents an adaptive recommender system called WEBLORS that aims at helping learners to overcome the information overload by providing them with additional personalized learning materials from the web to increase their learning and performance. This paper also presents the evaluation of WEBLORS based on its recommender system acceptance using data from 36 participants. The evaluation showed that overall, participants had a positive experience interacting with WEBLORS. They trusted the recommendations and found them helpful to improve learning and performance, and they agreed that they would like to use the system again.


Recommender systems Web mining Personalization 



The authors acknowledge the support of Athabasca University, Alberta Innovates – Technology Futures (AITF), Ministry of Advanced Education of Canada, the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [funding reference number: 402053-2012-RGPIN], and Mitacs.


  1. 1.
    Imran, H., Belghis-Zadeh, M., Chang, T.-W., Kinshuk, Graf, S.: PLORS: a personalized learning object recommender system. Vietnam J. Comput. Sci. 3(1), 3–13 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dwivedi, P., Bharadwaj, K.: e-Learning recommender system for a group of learners based on the unified learner profile approach. Expert Syst. 32(2), 264–276 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sabourin, J., Kosturko, L., McQuiggan, S.: Where to next? A comparison of recommendation strategies for navigating a learning object repository. In: Ricci, F., Bontcheva, K., Conlan, O., Lawless, S. (eds.) UMAP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9146, pp. 208–215. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  4. 4.
    Al Abri, M., Dabbagh, N.: Open educational resources: a literature review. J. Mason Grad. Res. 6(1), 83–104 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Akhtarzada, A., Calude, C.S., Hosking, J.: A multi-criteria metric algorithm for recommender systems. Fundamenta Informaticae 110, 1–11 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manouselis, N.: Recommender Systems for Learning. Springer, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dahdouh, K., Oughdir, L., Dakkak, A., Ibriz, A.: Building an e-learning recommender system using association rules techniques and R environment. Int. J. Inf. Sci. Technol. 3(2), 11–18 (2019)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bourkoukou, O., Bachari, E.E.: Toward a hybrid recommender system for e-learning personnalization based on data mining techniques. Int. J. Inform. Vis. 2(4), 271–278 (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zapata, A., Menéndez, V.H., Prieto, M.E., Romero, C.: A framework for recommendation in learning object repositories: an example of application in civil engineering. Adv. Eng. Softw. 56, 1–14 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atkinson, J., Gonzalez, A., Munoz, M., Astudillo, H.: Web metadata extraction and semantic indexing for learning objects extraction. Appl. Intell. 41(2), 649–664 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rahman, M.M., Abdullah, N.A.: A personalized group-based recommendation approach for web search in e-learning. IEEE Access 6, 34166–34178 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rose, S., Engel, D., Cramer, N., Cowley, W.: Automatic keyword extraction from individual documents. In: Text Mining, pp. 1–20. Wiley (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Felder, R., Silverman, L.: Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Eng. Educ. 78(7), 674–681 (1988)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Felder, R.M., Soloman, B.A.: Index of learning style questionnaire. Accessed 20 July 2019
  15. 15.
    Felder, R., Spurlin, J.: Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 21, 103–112 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    El-Bishouty, M.M., Saito, K., Chang, T.W., Kinshuk, Graf, S.: An interactive course analyzer for improving learning styles support level. In: Holzinger, A., Pasi, G. (eds.) HCI-KDD 2013. LNCS, vol. 7947, pp. 136–147. Springer, Cham (2013). Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bäck, T.: Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice: Evolution Strategies, Evolutionary Programming, Genetic Algorithms. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dougiamas, M.: Moodle. Accessed 20 July 2019
  19. 19.
    Brooke, J.: SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., et al. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor and Francis, London (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lewis, J.R., Sauro, J.: The factor structure of the system usability scale. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 94–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Belghis-Zadeh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hazra Imran
    • 2
  • Maiga Chang
    • 1
  • Sabine Graf
    • 1
  1. 1.Athabasca UniversityEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations