Advertisement

5G Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities with IoT and Smart Societies

  • Yelda Shah
  • Nishan Chelvachandran
  • Stefan Kendzierskyj
  • Hamid JahankhaniEmail author
  • Radovan Janoso
Chapter
  • 146 Downloads
Part of the Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications book series (ASTSA)

Abstract

5G, the fifth generation of wireless connectivity, is designed to allow long-distance coverage and stable connections as well as rapid data download and upload. As a result of 5G’s the wireless-based technology, the data migration enables a speed of 20 Gbps (Gigabyte per second) through wireless mobile data connections, which simplifies the management of excessive data transmission via 5G. The protocols capability for high quantity data transfer speeds with low latency, compared with the previous generations mobile data telephony makes the protocol ideal for both current IoT and automated systems, as well as enabling the development and further proliferation of more. Data transfer speeds and latency rates have been a bottleneck in the roll out of smart technologies. Despite the relatively high data speeds of 4G connectivity, the availability and development of infrastructure, together with the explosion in the ownership and use of devices utilising the technology, has been a limiting factor in the roll out and use of AI and automated technologies such as driverless vehicles and smart city implementations. Whilst 5G looks to solve these limitations brought by previous generations, there are also drawbacks with 5G. The frequency and narrow wavelength, known as millimeter wave, whilst enabling such high data transfer speeds and reduced latency, also has a very limited distance of effectivity. There is only a very short distance before the signal starts to deteriorate, after which, the deterioration is exponential. 5G signals also cannot penetrate or reflect off of buildings and other obstacles very easily. This means that for a 5G networks implementation to be maximised, direct line of sight between the connected device and the relays or radioheads must be maintained, or at least, with as minimal obstruction as possible. A work around to this limitation is through densification and utilising large numbers of small cell radio heads throughout a coverage area. This will require that there is far greater investment and redevelopment in the mobile telephony infrastructure for this strategy to be implemented.

Keywords

5G IoT AI Smart cities Privacy Cybersecurity Millimetre 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmad I, Gurtov A, Kumar T, Liyanage M, Okwuibe J, Ylianttila M (2017) [online] Available at http://jultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201902124647.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2019
  2. 2.
    Al-Dulaimi A, Chih-Lin I, Wang X (2018) 5G networks: fundamental requirements, enabling technologies, and operations management, 1st edn. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atlam HF, Wills GB (2019) IoT security, privacy, safety and ethics. In: Farsi M et al (eds) Digital twin technologies and smart cities, internet of things. Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baumgärtner B (2018) Die Bezeichnungen “SISO”, “SIMO”, “MISO” und “MIMO” beziehen sich auf den Übertragungskanal. Dessen “Eingang” sind die sendenden Geräte. Entsprechend werden die Empfänger als “Output” des Kanals bezeichnet. [online] Available at https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIMO_(Nachrichtentechnik)#/media/Datei:MIMO_SIMO_MISO_SISO_explanation_without_confusion.svg. Accessed 08 June 2019
  5. 5.
    Calder A, Watkins S (2015) IT governance: an international guide to data security and ISO27001/ISO27002, 6th edn. Kogan Page, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chandran S, Lobo A (2016) Ethics and compliance in corporations: value based approach. 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science and Technology (ETHICS) 1(1):1–4Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Condoluci M, Mahmoodi T (2018) Softwarization and virtualization in 5G mobile networks: benefits, trends and challenges. Comput Netw 146(1):65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edfors O, Larsson EG, Marzetta TL, Tufvesson F (2014) Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems. IEEE Communications Magazine. pp 186–195Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    El Hattachi R, Erfanian J (2015) 5G white paper: NGMN 5G initiative. NGMN Alliance. [online] Available at https://www.ngmn.org/fileadmin/ngmn/content/images/news/ngmn_news/NGMN_5G_White_Paper_V1_0.pdf. Accessed 25 July
  10. 10.
    Ellingsen SE, Løvholt F, Madshus C, Norèn-Cosgriff K (2017) Simulating low frequency sound transmission through walls and windows by a two-way coupled fluid structure interaction model. J Sound Vib 396(1):203–216Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Everythingrf (2018) What are millimeter waves?. [jpeg]. [online] Available at https://www.everythingrf.com/community/what-are-millimeter-waves. Accessed 07 July 2019
  12. 12.
    Fogg BJ, Tseng S (1999) Credibility and computing technology. Commun ACM 42(5):39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ge X, Mao G, Han T, Tu S, Wang CX (2016) 5G ultra-dense cellular networks. IEEE Wirel Commun 23(1):72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huawei (2018) 5G Security: forward thinking Huawei white paper. [online] Available at https://www.huawei.com/minisite/5g/img/5G_Security_Whitepaper_en.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2019
  15. 15.
    Infineon (2019) 5G – The high-speed mobile network of the future. [jpeg]. [online]. Available at https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/discoveries/mobile-communication-5g/. Accessed 28 July 2019
  16. 16.
    Khalaf K, Long J-R, Vidojkovic V, Wambacq P (2015) Data transmission at millimeter waves: exploiting the 60 GHz on silicon, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luoma E, Mazhelis O, Warma H (2012) Defining an Internet-of-Things Eco-System. In: Andreev S, Balandin S, Koucheryavy Y (eds) Internet of things, smart spaces, and next generation networking: 12th international conference, NEW2AN 2012 and 5th conference, ruSmart 2012, St. Petersburg, Russia, August 2012, Proceedings, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miller L (2016) IoT security for dummies, INSIDE secure edition. 1st. Chichester/West Sussex: WileyGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moore M (2018) What is industry 4.0? Everything you need to know. The latest news, views and developments in the world of Industry 4.0. [online] Available at https://www.techradar.com/news/what-is-industry-40-everything-you-need-to-know. Accessed 23 May 2019
  20. 20.
    Van der Nagel I (2016) The challenge of a secured 5G network. [online]. Available at https://itnext.io/the-challenges-of-a-secured-5g-network-2d0b283c9619. Accessed 27 July 2019
  21. 21.
    Nesterova M, Nesterova Y, Nicol S (2018) Evaluating power density for 5G applications. 2018 IEEE 5G World Forum (5GWF), pp 347–350Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rodriguez J (2015) Fundamentals of 5G mobile networks, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester/West SussexGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sawall A (2018) 3GPP: Standardisierung von 5G ist fertig. [online] Available at https://www.golem.de/news/3gpp-standardisierung-von-5g-ist-fertiggestellt-1806-134992.html. Accessed 10 Aug 2019
  24. 24.
    SDxCentral (2019) What are the top 5G security. Challenges. [online] Available at https://www.sdxcentral.com/5g/definitions/top-5g-security-challenges/. Accessed 17 Aug 2019
  25. 25.
    Seeburn K (2019) 5G and AI: a potentially potent combination. [online] Available at http://www.isaca.org/Knowledge-Center/Blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=1146#Comments. Accessed 19 Aug 2019
  26. 26.
    Statista (2016) Internet of things (IoT) connected devices installed base worldwide from 2015 to 2025 (in billions). [jpeg]. [online] Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/471264/iot-number-of-connected-devices-worldwide/. Accessed 05 July 2019
  27. 27.
    Techplayon (2017) Wavelength, frequency, amplitude and phase – defining waves!. [jpeg]. [online] Available at http://www.techplayon.com/wavelength-frequency-amplitude-phase-defining-waves/. Accessed 07 July 2019
  28. 28.
    Weber RH (2010) Internet of things – new security and privacy challenges. Comput Law Secur Rev 26(1):23–30MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    White G (2018) IPoC: a new core networking protocol for 5G networks. [online] Available at: https://www.cablelabs.com/ipoc-a-new-core-networking-protocol-for-5g-networks. Accessed 05 July 2019
  30. 30.
    Yesuf AS (2017) A review of risk identification approaches in the telecommunication domain. [online] Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314392917_A_Review_of_Risk_Identification_Approaches_in_the_Telecommunication_Domain [PDF] Conference paper. Conference: the 3rd international conference on information systems security and privacy – ICISSP. Accessed 15 August 2019
  31. 31.
    Zhang Y (2018) Network function virtualization concepts and applicability in 5G networks, 1st edn. Wiley, New JerseyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zinner S (2014) Codes of ethics move into the “third generations”. 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering 1(1):1–3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yelda Shah
    • 1
  • Nishan Chelvachandran
    • 2
  • Stefan Kendzierskyj
    • 3
  • Hamid Jahankhani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Radovan Janoso
    • 2
  1. 1.Northumbria UniversityLondonUK
  2. 2.Open Innovation HouseSaidot OY, ESPOOFinland
  3. 3.Cyfortis, Worcester ParkSurreyUK

Personalised recommendations