Advertisement

The Long-Run Impact of Zoning in US Cities

  • Tate TwinamEmail author
Chapter
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Since the early twentieth century, virtually every city in the USA has embraced comprehensive zoning as a means to shape and control the development of land use. Early zoning regulations took cues from existing land use patterns while also attempting to reduce land use conflict by enforcing a greater separation of incompatible uses. Zoning and land use have since coevolved endogenously over the course of the following century. This chapter synthesizes and elaborates on the work of Shertzer et al. (J Urban Econ 105:20–39, 2018) and Twinam (Reg Sci Urban Econ 73:155–169, 2018) aimed at measuring the causal impact of early zoning laws on the long-run evolution of land use in US cities. Using a wide variety of detailed pre-zoning microdata and digitized zoning maps from two major US cities, Chicago and Seattle, I employ several analytical approaches to answer the following questions: (1) To what extent did initial zoning efforts conflict or coincide with existing land uses? (2) Did zoning effect substantial changes in land use patterns? (3) How does the impact of zoning on the long-run development of land use compare to that of other important economic determinants, such as pre-existing land use patterns, geography, transportation, and demographics? My results suggest that zoning has played an influential role in determining the economic geography of US cities.

Keywords

Zoning Land use Seattle Chicago 

References

  1. Atack, J. (2016). Historical Geographic Information Systems (GIS) database of U.S. Railroads for 1826–1911. https://my.vanderbilt.edu/jeremyatack/files/2016/05/RR1826-1911Modified0509161.zip
  2. Blanchard, L. F. (1968). The street railway era in Seattle: A chronicle of six decades. Forty Fort: Harold E. Cox.Google Scholar
  3. Brooks, L., & Lutz, B. (2019). Vestiges of transit: Urban persistence at a microscale. Review of Economics and Statistics, 101(3), 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunten, D. M. (2017). Is the rent too high? Aggregate implications of local land-use regulation. FEDS Working Paper No. 2017-064.Google Scholar
  5. Fischel, W. A. (2015). Zoning rules!: The economics of land use regulation. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
  6. Gordon, C. (2009). Mapping decline: St. Louis and the fate of the American city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  7. Heise, D. R. (1972). Employing nominal variables, induced variables, and block variables in path analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 1(2), 147–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herkenhoff, K. F., Ohanian, L. E., & Prescott, E. C. (2018). Tarnishing the golden and empire states: Land-use restrictions and the US economic slowdown. Journal of Monetary Economics, 93, 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hirt, S. A. (2015). Zoned in the USA: The origins and implications of American land-use regulation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hornbeck, R., & Keniston, D. (2017). Creative destruction: Barriers to urban growth and the Great Boston Fire of 1872. American Economic Review, 107(6), 1365–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hunt, D. B., & DeVries, J. B. (2017). Planning Chicago. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelleher, S. (2015, March). Seattle’s micro-housing boom offers an affordable alternative. The Seattle Times.Google Scholar
  13. McMillen, D. (2015). Conditionally parametric quantile regression for spatial data: An analysis of land values in early nineteenth century Chicago. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 55, 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McMillen, D. P., & McDonald, J. F. (1991). A Markov chain model of zoning change. Journal of Urban Economics, 30(2), 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Munneke, H. J. (2005). Dynamics of the urban zoning structure: An empirical investigation of zoning change. Journal of Urban Economics, 58(3), 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Murray, C. K., & Frijters, P. (2016). Clean money, dirty system: Connected landowners capture beneficial land rezoning. Journal of Urban Economics, 93, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Redfearn, C. L. (2009). Persistence in urban form: The long-run durability of employment centers in metropolitan areas. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(2), 224–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shertzer, A., Twinam, T., & Walsh, R. P. (2016). Race, ethnicity, and discriminatory zoning. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(3), 1–31.Google Scholar
  19. Shertzer, A., Twinam, T., & Walsh, R. P. (2018). Zoning and the economic geography of cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 105, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shertzer, A., Walsh, R. P., & Logan, J. R. (2016). Segregation and neighborhood change in northern cities: New historical GIS data from 1900–1930. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 49(4), 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Siodla, J. (2015). Razing San Francisco: The 1906 disaster as a natural experiment in urban redevelopment. Journal of Urban Economics, 89, 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Siodla, J. (2017). Clean slate: Land-use changes in San Francisco after the 1906 disaster. Explorations in Economic History, 65, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Twinam, T. (2018). The long-run impact of zoning: Institutional hysteresis and durable capital in Seattle, 1920–2015. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 73, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wallace, N. E. (1988). The market effects of zoning undeveloped land: Does zoning follow the market? Journal of Urban Economics, 23(3), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Whitt, H. P. (1986). The sheaf coefficient: A simplified and expanded approach. Social Science Research, 15(2), 174–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Williams, D. B. (2015). Too high and too steep: Reshaping Seattle’s topography. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  27. Wolf, M. A. (2008). The zoning of America: Euclid V. Ambler. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsCollege of William & MaryWilliamsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations