Advertisement

Turning Bicultural Critical Incidents into Inclusive Bicultural Identities and Organizations in US Subsidiaries in Japan

  • Clifford H. Clarke
  • Naomi Takashiro
Chapter
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

In the context of US managers of subsidiaries in Japan, there have been numerous mistaken perceptions, errors in judgment, and failures of execution (MEF) observed in critical incidents (CI) between Japanese and Americans that resulted in financial losses from decreased productivity for the companies and damaged careers of individual managers of both cultures due to communication breakdowns in task performance.

Our purposes were to demonstrate a pathway for avoiding this result and to challenge researchers, consultants, and organizations to engage together in achieving the goals of transforming individual identity and of developing bicultural organizations.

Methods employed were a qualitative phenomenological ethnographic research approach of observation, interview, analysis, and resolution formation by paired teams of Japanese and US researchers and facilitators in navigating MEF-provoked employee CIs.

Results showed that employees in these processes were enabled (a) to reduce MEF frequency, (b) to increase productive time-on-tasks, (c) to increase satisfaction with bicultural partners, (d) to increase confidence in evolving bicultural identities, and (e) to increase commitment to working in a bicultural organization. The benefits for organizations were reductions in costs and increased productivity.

Practical implications from this study were that inclusive bicultural identity and the development of bicultural organizations were achieved by this exceptional integration of researchers and practitioners. It serves as a model for other researchers, practitioners, and organizations with common goals.

Limitations were the inadequate number of bicultural CIs to illustrate the multiplicity of learning outcomes of this CI technique (CIT). Nine other CIs were not included due to space limitations. Some limitation on expanding researcher’ roles were the result of a few client commitments of resources.

Our originality in this study was that integration of researcher and consultant roles in long-term embedded positions in bicultural business contexts uniquely demonstrated how research and development through focused exploration of work-stopping MEF-caused CIs created bicultural workforces and transforming bicultural identities among Japanese and US managers.

Keywords

Mistakes Errors Failures Intercultural management development Japan-US business Bicultural identity development Critical incident technique 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank our clients for their commitment to resolving their intercultural organizations’ issues, our full-time associates for their compassion and excellence, and our external researchers’ inspirational support and for their published articles on our work (in italics). These research-consultants were Dean Barnlund, Harumi Befu, Kline Harrison, Todd Imahori, Mitch Hammer, Judith Martin, Michael Paige, Paul Pedersen, George Renwick, Steven Rhinesmith, and Muneo Yoshikawa. Their roles were described in Clarke (2008). Above all, we thank our God, our families, and Pata-Pata for their sustaining support.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1988), Organizational applications of socio-cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management. 13, 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnlund, D. C. (1976, July). Multileveled, Multidimensional, Multidirectional, Multi-Coded Intercultural Communication. Paper Presented at the 1st Stanford Institute For Intercultural Communication, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  3. Barnlund, D.C. (1989) Public and private self in communicating with Japan, Business Horizons, March-April. 32–40.Google Scholar
  4. Bejinaru, R. (2010). Knowledge dynamics and the concept of ‘BA’. The Annals of “The Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Romania. 10, 339–943.Google Scholar
  5. Black, J. S. & Mendenhall, M. (1993). Resolving conflicts with the Japanese–Mission Impossible? Sloan Management Review (Spring). 34(3), 49–59.Google Scholar
  6. Broome, B. J. (2009). Building relational empathy through an interactive design process. In D. D. J. Sandole, S. Byrne, I. Staroste-Sandole, J. Senihi (Eds.), Handbook of Conflict analysis and resolution (pp. 184–200). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Cartwright, M. (2018). Yin and Yang. Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved from: https://www.ancient.eu/Yin_and_Yang/
  8. Clarke, C. H. (1992). Communicating benefits to a culturally diverse employee population. Employees Benefits Journal (March). 17(1), 26–32.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, C. H. (2008). Practicing the integration of discipline and compassion. Journal of Intercultural Communication. 11, 1–21.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, C. H. (2017). Reflections From History: How Shifting Paradigms Created Intercultural Innovations. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 20, 1–26.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, C. H. & Kanatani, K. (1979). Structure of turn taking. Language, Education, and Technology. 12–24. NII Electronic Library Service (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, C. H. & Lipp, G. D. (1998a). Danger and Opportunity–Resolving Conflict in U.S. Based Japanese Subsidiaries. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
  13. Clarke, C. H. & Lipp, G. L. (1998b). Conflict resolution for contrasting cultures, Training & Development, February. 22–33. Arlington, VA: ASTD Press.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke, C. H. & Takashiro, N. (2019). Transforming shame to collective pride and social equity in bicultural organizations in Japan. In C. H. Mayer & E. Vanderheiden (Eds.), The Bright Side of Shame. Switzerland: Springer Nature. (pp. 267–28).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, E. G. (1994), Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research (Spring). 64(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, E. G. (1995), Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal (Spring). 32(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edvardsson, B. & Roos, I. (2001). Critical Incident Techniques: Towards a Framework for Analysing the Criticality of Critical Incidents. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 12(3), 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin. 51(4), 327–358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gronewold, U., Gold, A., Salterio, S. E. (2013). Reporting Self-Made Errors: The impact of organizational error-management climate and error type. Journal of Business Ethics. 117, 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gudykundst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self-construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 510–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gulker, J. E. and Monteith, M. J. (2013). Intergroup boundaries and attitudes: the power of a single potent link. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 39(7), 943–955.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gutierrez, B., Howard-Grenville, J., & Scully, M. A. (2010). Split Identification and an unlikely change effort. Academy of Management Journal. 53(4), 673–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, E. T. (1987). The Hidden Dimension: Doing Business with the Japanese. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  25. Hawes, F. & Kealey, D. J. (1981). An empirical study of Canadian technical assistance: Adaptation and effectiveness on overseas assignment. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 5(3) 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hyman, H. H. (1960). Reflections on Reference Groups. Oxford Academy’s Public Opinion Quarterly. 24(3), 383–396).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kolb D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Konishi, E., Yahiro, M., Ono, M., and Nakajima, N. (2007). Harmony (Wa): The Japanese traditional value and its implications for nursing ethics in Japan. Japan Association for Bioethics (September). 17(1), 74–81. NII–Electronic Library Service.Google Scholar
  29. Kowner, R, (2002). Japanese communication in intercultural encounters: the barrier of status-related behavior. International Journal for Intercultural Relations. 26, 339–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malbasic, I., Mas-Machuca, and Marimon, F. (2018). Through the decreased values gap to increased organizational effectiveness: The mediating role of organizational commitment. Journal of Human Values. 24(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  31. Markus, H.R. and Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review. 98(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mendenhall, M., Oddou, G. R., Stevens, M. J., Bird, A., Osland, J., Furuya, N. (2009). Developing Global Competencies in Japanese Managers: Research, Process, and Recommendations. Journal of Strategic Management Studies (October). 7(2), 57–67.Google Scholar
  33. Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative Learning as Discourse. Journal of Transformative Education (January). 1(1), 58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mezirow, J. (2004). Forum comment on Sharan Merriman’s “The role of cognitive development in Mezirow’s transformational learning theory”. Adult Education Quarterly (November). 55(1), 69–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moore-Jones, P.J. (2018), Intercultural Sensitivity, Intercultural Competence & Intercultural Intelligence: A Review of Literature and a Proposition of a Linear Relationship, Journal of Education and Culture Studies. 2(2) 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morizuma (2011). Constructing multifaceted cultural identity theory: Beyond dichotomization of individualism-collectivism. China Media Research. 7(2) 17–25.Google Scholar
  37. Nishishiba, M. & Richie, L. D. (2000), The concept of trustworthiness: A cross-cultural comparison between Japanese and U.S. business people, Journal of Applied Communication Research. 28(4) 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nonaka, I. & Konno, N. (1998). The Concept of “BA”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review. 40(3), 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nonaka, I., Ray, T., & Umemoto, K. (2008). Japanese knowledge creation in Anglo-American environments. Prometheus–Critical Studies in Innovation. 16(4), 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oosterling, H. (2005). MA or Sensing Time–Space: Towards a culture of the inner. Internet reprint of lecture, Berlin. Retrieved from: https://www.henkoosterling.nl/pdfs/lect_berlin_ma_2005.pdf.
  41. Pilgrim, R. B. (1986). Intervals (“Ma”) in Space and Time–Foundations for a Religio-Aesthetic Paradigm in Japan. History of Religions (February). 25(3), 255–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ruben, B.D. & Kealey, D.J. (1979). Behavioral assessment of communication competency and the prediction of cross-cultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 3 15–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rubin, H. J. & Rubin, I. S. (2012) (2nd Edition). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  44. Thomas, D. C. (2006). Domain and Development of Cultural Intelligence: The Importance of Mindfulness. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 31, 78–99.Google Scholar
  45. Thomas, D. C. & Toyne, B. (1995). Subordinates’ responses to cultural adaptation by Japanese expatriate managers. Journal of Business Research. 32, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trifiletti, E. & Capozza, D. (2011). Examining group-based trust with the investment game. Social Behavior and Personality. 39(3), 405–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. West, A. L., Zhang, R., Yampolsky, M., Sasaki, J. Y. (2017). More Than The Sum of Its Parts: A Transformative Theory of Biculturalism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 48(7), 963–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Japanese Key Words and Core Cultural Values. Language in Society (September). 20(3), 333–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams, M. (2007), Building Genuine Trust Through Interpersonal Emotion Management: A Threat Regulation Model of Trust and Collaboration Across Boundaries. Academy of Management Review. 32(2), 595–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yamazaki, Y. (2005), Learning styles and typologies of cultural differences: A theoretical and empirical comparison. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 29, 521–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yamazaki, Y. & Kayes, D. C. (2004). An Experimental Approach to Cross-Cultural Learning: A Review and Integration of Competencies for Successful Expatriate Adaptation. Academy of Management Learning & Education. 3(4), 362–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yamazaki, Y. & Kayes, D. C. (2007). Expatriate learning: exploring how Japanese managers adapt in the U.S. International Journal of Human Resource Management (August). 18(8), 1373–1395.Google Scholar
  53. Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., Brewer, M. B., and Takemura, K. (2005). Cross-Cultural Differences in Relationship- and Group-Based Trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 31, 48–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clifford H. Clarke
    • 1
  • Naomi Takashiro
    • 2
  1. 1.Affiliated Graduate FacultyUniversity of Hawai‘iMānoaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Global TourismKyoto University of Foreign StudiesUkyō-ku, KyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations