Advertisement

Ethics (Informed Consent and Conflicts of Interest)

  • Kara K. RossfeldEmail author
  • Jordan M. Cloyd
  • Elizabeth Palmer
  • Timothy M. Pawlik
Chapter
  • 36 Downloads
Part of the Success in Academic Surgery book series (SIAS)

Abstract

The aim of clinical trials is to obtain generalizable knowledge that can be used to advance healthcare. The ethical issues in clinical trials arise when human subjects, who may not directly benefit from the research, are faced with the risk of being exploited or harmed. Additional ethical challenges pertain to informed consent of subjects and conflicts of interest of physician-investigators. The current ethical standards for research are based on guidelines and laws which were a necessary response to historical abuses of participants in the name of science. In this chapter, a framework for evaluating clinical research for ethical deficits is discussed, as are challenges in upholding ethical principles, including in obtaining informed consent from research participants as well as in navigating conflicts of interest.

Keywords

Biomedical research ethics Informed consent Surgical innovation Emergency surgery Conflict of interest 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the outstanding work of Jukes Namm and Peter Angelos for authoring the first edition of this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg Military tribunals under control council law no. 10. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1949. p. 181–182.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Declaration of Helsinki: recommendations guiding doctors in clinical research. Finland: 18th World Medical Assembly; June 1964.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Declaration of Helsinki: recommendations guiding medical doctors in biomedical research involving human subjects. Japan: 29th World Medical Assembly; October 1975.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brandt AM. Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee syphilis study. Hast Cent Rep. 1978;8(6):21–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beecher HK. Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1966;274(24):1354–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sparks J. Timeline of laws related to the protection of human subjects. National Institutes of Health Office of History; June 2002. https://history.nih.gov/about/timelines_laws_human.html.
  7. 7.
    Menikoff J. Rules and regulations. Fed Regist. 2017;82(12):7149–62.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menikoff J, Kaneshiro J, Pritchard I. The common rule, updated. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):613–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. In: Services UDoHaH, editor. Title 45: public welfare; part 46—protection of human subjects. Online 2018.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA. 2000;283(20):2701–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barondess JA. Medicine against society. Lessons from the Third Reich. JAMA. 1996;276(20):1657–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(3):141–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berry MF, Zeyer-Brunner J, Castleberry AW, Martin JT, Gloor B, Pietrobon R, et al. Treatment modalities for T1N0 esophageal cancers: a comparative analysis of local therapy versus surgical resection. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(6):796–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ell C, May A, Gossner L, Pech O, Gunter E, Mayer G, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2000;118(4):670–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Omae M, Fujisaki J, Horiuchi Y, Yoshizawa N, Matsuo Y, Kubota M, et al. Safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophagogastric junction cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16(2):147–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ioannidis JPA, Stuart ME, Brownlee S, Strite SA. How to survive the medical misinformation mess. Eur J Clin Investig. 2017;47(11):795–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rice TW. The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research. Respir Care. 2008;53(10):1325–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barker AD, Sigman CC, Kelloff GJ, Hylton NM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86(1):97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Behrendt C, Golz T, Roesler C, Bertz H, Wunsch A. What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients’ understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials. J Med Ethics. 2011;37(2):74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robinson EJ, Kerr CE, Stevens AJ, Lilford RJ, Braunholtz DA, Edwards SJ, et al. Lay public’s understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9(8):1–192, iii-iv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Falagas ME, Korbila IP, Giannopoulou KP, Kondilis BK, Peppas G. Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand? Am J Surg. 2009;198(3):420–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dellson P, Nilsson K, Jernstrom H, Carlsson C. Patients’ reasoning regarding the decision to participate in clinical cancer trials: an interview study. Trials. 2018;19(1):528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Angelos P. Ethical issues of participant recruitment in surgical clinical trials. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(10):3184–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bossert S, Strech D. An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving ‘understanding’ in informed consent. Trials. 2017;18(1):482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC. Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(2):139–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cohn EG, Jia H, Smith WC, Erwin K, Larson EL. Measuring the process and quality of informed consent for clinical research: development and testing. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011;38(4):417–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gillies K, Elwyn G, Cook J. Making a decision about trial participation: the feasibility of measuring deliberation during the informed consent process for clinical trials. Trials. 2014;15:307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stryker JE, Wray RJ, Emmons KM, Winer E, Demetri G. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(1–2):104–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wade J, Elliott D, Avery KNL, Gaunt D, Young GJ, Barnes R, et al. Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: development and preliminary evaluation of a measure of participatory and informed consent (PIC). Trials. 2017;18(1):327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Childers R, Lipsett PA, Pawlik TM. Informed consent and the surgeon. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(4):627–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Synnot A, Ryan R, Prictor M, Fetherstonhaugh D, Parker B. Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(5):CD003717.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Agre P, Rapkin B. Improving informed consent: a comparison of four consent tools. IRB. 2003;25(6):1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Grady C, Cummings SR, Rowbotham MC, McConnell MV, Ashley EA, Kang G. Informed consent. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(9):856–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wendler D. The assent requirement in pediatric research. In: Emanuel EJ, editor. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gilbert T, Bosquet A, Thomas-Anterion C, Bonnefoy M, Le Saux O. Assessing capacity to consent for research in cognitively impaired older patients. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:1553–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Karlawish J. Emergency research. In: Emanuel EJ, editor. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Capron A. Legal and regulatory standards of informed consent in research. In: Emanuel EJ, editor. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Angelos P. Surgical ethics and the challenge of surgical innovation. Am J Surg. 2014;208(6):881–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stead WW. The complex and multifaceted aspects of conflicts of interest. JAMA. 2017;317(17):1765–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Thompson DF. Understanding financial conflicts of interest. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(8):573–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lo B, Field MJ, editors. Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Agrawal S, Brennan N, Budetti P. The sunshine act—effects on physicians. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(22):2054–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cherla DV, Olavarria OA, Holihan JL, Viso CP, Hannon C, Kao LS, et al. Discordance of conflict of interest self-disclosure and the centers of Medicare and Medicaid services. J Surg Res. 2017;218:18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jacmon H. Disclosure is inadequate as a solution to managing conflicts of interest in human research. J Bioeth Inq. 2018;15(1):71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lichter AS. Conflict of interest and the integrity of the medical profession. JAMA. 2017;317(17):1725–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kara K. Rossfeld
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jordan M. Cloyd
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Palmer
    • 1
  • Timothy M. Pawlik
    • 1
  1. 1.The Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations