Advertisement

Between Research and Action: The Generative Sense of Technology

  • Michele Della VenturaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11937)

Abstract

Web search and the consequent possibility of accessing billions of documents, with relative ease, is now an important resource for students in the learning process. But what seems to prefigure a new era in sharing knowledge risks remaining a utopia for dyslexic students. This paper presents an educational experience based on the use of Instagram to create a “visual” search engine where the search results are shown through images (and not just words) that represent the educational mediator to recall content related to specific concepts. The affordances of this tool and its educational implications are analysed (highlighting their potential and threats) in order to develop appropriate actions for this new learning environment.

Keywords

Affordance Dyslexia Instagram Learning Motivation 

References

  1. 1.
    Smith-Spark, J.H., Fisk, J.E.: Working memory functioning in developmental dyslexia. Memory 15(1), 34–56 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Santana, V.F., de Oliveira, R., Almeida, L.D.A., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Web accessibility and people with dyslexia: a survey on techniques and guidelines. In: Vigo, M., Abascal, J., Salomoni, P., Lopes, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), pp. 16–17. France, Lyon (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mason, L., Boldrin, A.: Epistemic metacognition in the context of information searching on the web. In: Khine, M.S. (ed.) Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures, pp. 377–404. Springer, Perth (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6596-5_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hatcher, J., Snowling, M.J., Griffiths, Y.M.: Cognitive assessment of dyslexic students in higher education. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 72(1), 119–133 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hedegaard-Hansen, J.: Limits to inclusion. Int. J. Inclusive Educ. 16(1), 89–98 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1080/13603111003671632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kanter, A.S., Damiani, M.L., Ferri, B.A.: The right to inclusive education under international law: following Italy’s lead. J. Int. Spec. Needs Educ. 17(1), 21–32 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yeh, Y.-F., Hsu, Y.-S., Chuang, F.-T., Hwang, F.-K.: Middle-school students’ online information problem solving behaviors on the information retrieval interface. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 30(2), 245–260 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marinelli, A., Ferri, P.: Introduzione. In: Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Robinson, A. (eds.) Culture partecipative e competenze digitali. Media education per il XXI seco- lo, pp. 7–53. Guerini, Milano (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laneve, C.: Elementi di didattica generale. La Scuola, Brescia (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Della Ventura, M.: Twitter as a music education tool to enhance the learning process: conversation analysis. In: Deng, L., Ma, W.W.K., Fong, C.W.R. (eds.) New Media for Educational Change. ECTY, pp. 81–88. Springer, Singapore (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8896-4_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Della Ventura, M.: Creating inspiring learning environments by means of digital technologies: a case study of the effectiveness of WhatsApp in music education. EAI Endorsed Trans. e-Learning. J. 4 (2017). ISSN: 2032-9253. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.26-7-2017.152906
  12. 12.
    MacFarlane, A., Albrair, A., Marshall, C.R., Buchanan, G.: Phonological working memory impacts on information searching: an investigation of Dyslexia. In: Proceedings of IIiX 2012 the Fourth Information Interaction in Context Symposium, pp. 27–34. Nijmegen, The Netherlands (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Al-Maskari, A., Sanderson, M.: The effect of user characteristics on search effectiveness in information retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 47(5), 719–729 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boyd, D.: It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press, London (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Della Ventura, M.: Monitoring the learning process to enhance motivation by means of learning by discovery using Facebook. In: Ma, W.W.K., Chan, W.W.L., Cheng, C.M. (eds.) Shaping the Future of Education, Communication and Technology. ECTY, pp. 117–128. Springer, Singapore (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6681-9_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, B., Quellmalz, E.: New assessments and environments for knowledge building. In: Griffin, P., McGaw, B., Care, E. (eds.) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, pp. 231–300. Springer, Dordrecht (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brown, P., Green, A., Lauder, H.: High Skills: Globalization, Competitiveness, and Skill Formation: Globalization, Competitiveness, and Skill Formation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mason, R., Rennie, F.: Using web 2.0 for learning in the community. Internet High. Educ. 10(3), 196–203 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Papert, S.: The children’s machines: rethinking school in the age of the computer. Basic Books, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bevilacqua, B.: Apprendimento significativo mediato dalla tecnologia. Ricerca e Tecnologia 2(6), 1–15 (2011) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyMusic Academy “Studio Musica”TrevisoItaly

Personalised recommendations