Advertisement

Experiences of the Flipped Classroom Method—Does It Make Students More Motivated?

  • Synnøve Thomassen AndersenEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11937)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to highlight use of the flipped classroom method, and how teachers perceive this teaching practice. More specific the research focus on whether the teachers’ experience that the model leads to increased motivation in the students learning process. The background for the research is generated from qualitative interviews with teachers, and the empirical data obtained is from semi-structured interviews with these informants. The results show that the flipped classroom method in fact did increase participation and cooperation, which in turn generated motivation and willing students. The teachers got more time for guidance of each student, which provided more solid knowledge on each student’s academic level.

Keywords

Flipped classroom Video Learning processes Teaching strategy Communication 

References

  1. 1.
    Bishop, J.L., Verleger, M.A.: A survey of flipped classroom research. In: 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Driscoll, T.: Flipped learning and democratic education: the complete report (2012). http://www.flipped-history.com/2012/12/flipped-learning-democratic-education.html
  3. 3.
    Herreid, C.F., Schiller, N.A.: Case studies and the flipped classroom. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 42(5), 62–66 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K., Arfstrom, K.M.: A review of flipped learning, p. 20. George Mason University (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Imsen, G.: Elevens verden: innføring i pedagogisk psykologi, 4 Utg edn. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skaalvik, E.M., Skaalvik, S.: Motivasjon for læring: teori og praksis. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bergmann, J., Sams, A.: Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. ISTE, Washington, D.C. (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barker, D.: Flipped Classroom: det omvända arbetssättet. Natur & Kultur, Stockholm (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krumsvik, R.J.: Klasseledelse i den digitale skolen. Cappelen Damm Akademisk, Oslo (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yarbro, J., Arfstrom, K.M., McKnight, K., McKnight, P.: Extension of a review of flipped learning, p. 21. George Mason University (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nohr, M., Johansson, M.: Hvordan opplever studenter lærerens egenproduserte video som læringsressurs? Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wenger, E.: En social teori om læring. In: Illeris, K. (ed.) Tekster om læring. Roskilde Universitets Forlag, Danmark (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dysthe, O.: Dialog, samspel og læring. Abstrakt forlag, Oslo (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thagaard, T.: Systematikk og innlevelse: En innføring i kvalitativ metode, 4 utg edn. Fagbokforlaget, Bergen (2013). ISBN 9788245014938Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walsham, G.: Doing interpretive research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15(3), 320–330 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johannessen, A., Tufte, P.A., Kristoffersen, L.: Introduksjon til samfunnsvitenskapelig1 metode. Abstrakt forlag, Oslo (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kvale, S., Brinkmann, S.: Det kvalitative forskningsintervju, Utgave: 2 utg edn. Gyldendal Akademisk, Oslo (2009). ISBN: 9788205385290Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Postholm, M.B.: Kvalitativ metode/en innføring med fokus på fenomenologi, etnografi og kasusstudier. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations