Advertisement

Dimensions of a Learning Organisation in the IT Sector and Secondary Schools in the Czech Republic

  • Vaclav ZubrEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11937)

Abstract

Organisations with a learning organisation concept are finding a better position in response to external stimuli, greater flexibility (and therefore the ability to keep up with development) or to improve corporate image through this concept. Employee satisfaction can also be improved by promoting learning. So far, only a few studies have been performed on Czech Republic territory using the Dimension of Learning Organisation Questionnaire. The aim of this study is to compare results in the 2018 and 2019 surveys conducted in the IT sector and secondary schools in the Czech Republic. The results show that there is a statistically significant difference in the significance level p = 0.05 in 2018 between the age categories 11–20 years and 21–30 years (p = 0.04) in relation to the evaluation of the individual dimensions of the learning organisation. Simultaneously, there is a statistically significant difference between the average dimension rating for organisations with less than 250 employees in 2018 and 2019 (p = 0.02). Overall, after comparing the surveys, it is argued that the implementation rate of a learning organisation in the IT sector and in the secondary school sector is roughly the same.

Keywords

IT sector Secondary schools DLOQ 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The paper was written with the support of the specific project 2019 grant “Determinants of Cognitive Processes Impacting the Work Performance” granted by the University of Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic and thanks to help of students František Hašek and Jan Petružálek.

References

  1. 1.
    Garvin, A., Edmondson, A.C., Gino, F.: Is yours a learning organization? Harv. Bus. Rev. 86(3), 109 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armstrong, M.: Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, 14th edn. Kogan Page Limited, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Senge, P.: Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Management Press, Praha (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Birdthistle, N.: Family Businesses and the Learning Organisation: A Guide to Transforming the Family Business into a Learning Organisation. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG, Saarbrücken (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ticha, I.: Learning Organizations. Alfa Publishing, Praha (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zubr, V., Mohelska, H., Sokolova, M.: Factors with positive and negative impact on learning organisation. In: Jedlička, P. (ed.) International Scientific Conference Hradec Economic Days 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 980–985. University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yadav, S., Agarwal, V.: Benefits and barriers of learning organization and its five discipline. IOSR J. Bus. Manag. 18(12), 18–24 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norashikin, H., Amnah, M., Fauziah, N., Noormala, A.: Learning organization and its effect on organizational performance and organizational innovativeness: a proposed framework for Malaysian public institutions of higher education. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 130, 299–304 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kyoungshin, K., Watkins, K., Lu, Z.: The impact of a learning organization on performance: focusing on knowledge performance and financial performance. Eur. J. Train. Dev. 41(2), 177–193 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Erdem, M., İlğan, A., Uçar, H.: Relationship between learning organization and job satisfaction of primary school teachers. Int. Online J. Educ. Sci. 6(1), 8–20 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dekoulou, P., Trivellas, P.: Measuring the impact of learning organization on job satisfaction and individual performance in Greek advertising sector. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 175, 367–375 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zubr, V.: Studies with dimensions of learning organization questionnaire – research study. In: Jedlička, P., Marešová, P., Soukal, I. (eds.) International Scientific Conference Hradec Economic Days 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 592–600. University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove (2019)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Watkins, K.E., Marsick, V.J.: Sculpting the Learning Organization: Lessons in the Art and Science of Systematic Change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Watkins, K.E., O’Neil, J.: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire (the DLOQ): a nontechnical manual. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 15(2), 133–147 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marsick, V., Watkins, K.: Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: the dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 5(2), 132–151 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qawasmeh, F., Al-Omari, Z.: The learning organization dimensions and their impact on organizational performance: orange Jordan as a case study. Arab Econ. Bus. J. 8(1–2), 38–52 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Norashikin, H., Safiah, O., Fauziah, N., Noormala, A.: Learning organization culture, organizational performance and organizational innovativeness in a public institution of higher education in Malaysia: a preliminary study. Proc. Econ. Financ. 37, 512–519 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Kools, M., Stoll, L.: What Makes a School a Learning Organisation?. OECD Publishing, Paris (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khamis Ali, A.: Academic staff´s perceptions of characteristics of learning organization in a higher learning institution. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 26(1), 55–82 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Secondary Schools. https://www.stredniskoly.cz/. Accessed 23 July 2019
  26. 26.
    Statistics Solutions: Cronbach´s Alpha. https://www.statisticssolutions.com/cronbachs-alpha/. Accessed 24 July 2019
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
    Berberoğlu, A., Emine, Ü.: Relation between organizational learning and organizational commitment: case study of a private bank in North Cyprus. In: Turner, G., Minnone, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Intellectual Capital, Nicosia, Cyprus, pp. 87–93. University of Nicosia, Cyprus (2011)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sohaib, M., Ihsaan, M., Yousaf, J., Majeed, A.: Factors affecting the organizational learning: a study of banking sector of Pakistan. Int. J. Manag. Organ. Stud. 2(2), 16–22 (2014)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Al Ola, A., Laila, M.: The availability of dimensions of learning organizations questionnaire (DLOQ) in educational college at Taif University from the perspective of employees. J. Educ. Psychol. Sci. 18(1), 447–487 (2017)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nazari, K., Pihie, Z.: Assessing learning organization dimensions and demographic factors in technical and vocational colleges in Iran. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 3(3), 210–219 (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Song, J.H., Chai, D.S., Kim, J., Bae, S.H.: Job performance in the learning organization: the mediating impacts of self-efficacy and work engagement. Perform. Improv. Q. 30(4), 249–271 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Voolaid, K.: Measurement of organizational learning of business schools. Thesis on Economics H33. TUT Press, Tallin (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Informatics and ManagementUniversity of Hradec KraloveHradec KraloveCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations