Effect of Augmented Reality on Astronomical Observation Instruction

  • Chia-Ling Chiang
  • Yu-Lin Lin
  • Han-Chieh Chao
  • Jen-Yeu Chen
  • Chih-Hung LaiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11937)


Knowledge about astronomy is an important part of natural science; however, students taking the course of observing the outer space and stars cannot efficiently engage in the activity that poor learning outcome results from the limits of time, place, weather, and flat teaching materials. Although simulation software or paper-based planispheres have been applied to support astronomy learning, students cannot clearly understand the three-dimensional nature of astronomical concepts. Recently, due to the rapid advancement of technology, augmented reality (AR) is applied more and more to education. With the support of AR, classrooms are provided with real-and-virtual-combined learning equipment for students to reach the goal of visualizing complicated space relationships and abstract conception. It seems to bring a new opportunity for astronomy learning. However, although there have been studies on applications of augmented reality, few of them are concerned about empirical investigation on astronomical observation. This study therefore aims to establish an augmented-reality learning system on mobile devices and compare the differences among learning aids of a paper-based planisphere, computer simulation, and augmented reality on cognitive learning achievement and stargazing skill on astronomical instruction. Three classes of elementary students, in total, 87 students, participated in this study. One class used augmented reality on mobile devices to conduct astronomical observation, another class used simulation, and the other class used paper-based planispheres. The results indicate that augmented reality was effective in improving astronomy knowledge and stargazing skill.


Augmented reality Astronomical observation Stargazing Elementary education 



The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan for financially supporting this research under Contract No. MOST 105-2511-S-259 -004 -MY3.


  1. 1.
    Zhang, J., Sung, Y.T., Hou, H.T., Chang, K.E.: The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Comput. Educ. 73, 178–188 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hobson, S.M., Trundle, K.C. Saçkes, M.: Using a planetarium software program to promote conceptual change with young children. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 19(2), 165–176 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tarng, W., Liou, H.: The application of virtual reality in astronomy education. Adv. Technol. Learn. 4(3), 160–169 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hauze, S.W., Hoyt, H.H., Frazee, J.P., Greiner, Philip A., Marshall, J.M.: Enhancing nursing education through affordable and realistic holographic mixed reality: the virtual standardized patient for clinical simulation. In: Rea, P.M. (ed.) Biomedical Visualisation. AEMB, vol. 1120, pp. 1–13. Springer, Cham (2019). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hsiao, K.L., Huang, T.C., Chen, M.Y., Chiang, N.T.: Understanding the behavioral intention to play Austronesian learning games: from the perspectives of learning outcome, service quality, and hedonic value. Interact. Learn. Environ. 26(3), 372–385 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tarng, W., Ou, K.L., Lu, Y.C., Shih, Y.S., Liou, H.H.: A sun path observation system based on augmented reality and mobile learning. Mobile Inf. Syst. 2018, 10 (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu, H.-K., Lee, S.W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., Liang, J.-C.: Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Comput. Educ. 62, 41–49 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Billinghurst, M., Grasset, R., Seichter, H.: Tangible interfaces for ambient augmented reality applications. In: Aghajan, H., Augusto, J.C., Delgado, R. (eds.) Human-Centric Interface for Ambient Intelligence, pp. 281–302. Elsevier, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M.B., Kloos, C.D.: Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Comput. Educ. 66, 586–596 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sotiriou, S., Bogner, F.X.: Visualizing the invisible: augmented reality as an innovative science education scheme. Adv. Sci. Lett. 1(1), 114–122 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cadavieco, J.F., Goulão, M.D.F., Costales, A.F.: Using augmented reality and m-learning to optimize students performance in higher education. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 46, 2970–2977 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    El Sayed, N.A.M., Zayed, H.H., Sharawy, M.I.: ARSC: augmented reality student card. Comput. Educ. 56(4), 1045–1061 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaufmann, H., Schmalstieg, D.: Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Comput. Graph. 27(3), 339–345 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, C.M., Tsai, Y.N.: Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Comput. Educ. 59(2), 638–652 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    van Krevelen, D.W.F., Poelman, R.: A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. Int. J. Virtual Reality 9(2), 1–20 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Butchart, B.: Augmented reality for smartphones: a guide for developers and content publishers (2011). Accessed 20 Aug 2019
  17. 17.
    Klopfer, E., Sheldon, J.: Augmenting your own reality: student authoring of science-based augmented reality games. New Dir. Youth Dev. 128, 85–94 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hsu, T.C.: Learning English with augmented reality: do learning styles matter? Comput. Educ. 106, 137–149 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hsu, T.C.: Effects of gender and different augmented reality learning systems on English vocabulary learning of elementary school students. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 18(2), 315–325 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang, Y.J., Reynoso, L.C.: Based on physical self-concept to discuss the effect of environmental education on health related physical education. Ekoloji 27(106), 1645–1651 (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lu, S.J., Liu, Y.C.: Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Env. Educ. Res. 21(4), 525–541 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lin, H.C.K., Chen, M.C., Chang, C.K.: Assessing the effectiveness of learning solid geometry by using an augmented reality-assisted learning system. Interact. Learn. Environ. 23(6), 799–810 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gutierrez, R.C., Martinez, M.D.D., Bravo, J.A.H., Bravo, J.R.H.: Emerging technologies in social sciences teaching. an experience using augmented reality in teacher training. Digital Educ. Rev. 27, 143–158 (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen, C.C., Lin, P.H.: Development and evaluation of a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for astronomy education. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24(3), 644–661 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brown, J.S., Collins, A., Duguid, P.: Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ. Res. 18(1), 32–41 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chia-Ling Chiang
    • 1
  • Yu-Lin Lin
    • 1
  • Han-Chieh Chao
    • 1
  • Jen-Yeu Chen
    • 1
  • Chih-Hung Lai
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.National Dong Hwa UniversityHualien CityTaiwan, R.O.C.

Personalised recommendations