The Cost of Counting Disability: Theorizing the Possibility of a Non-economic Remainder

  • Tanya TitchkoskyEmail author
Part of the Critical Studies of Education book series (CSOE, volume 12)


Critical disability studies begin from the perspective that whatever else disability may be, it is certainly constituted between people, between the perceiver and the perceived. Beginning from this interpretivist position has real consequences for research. Instead of regarding disability as a pre-constituted, objectively given lack that begs for aid, assistance, or help, we can regard disability as an inter-subjectively constituted situation that invites the researcher to consider how people orient to disability and make this meaningful. This chapter engages one such meaning-making situation, namely the ordinary and ubiquitous ways that disability is expressed as an expense.


“Expense talk” Human imagination Impairment Representation Productivity/loss of productivity 


  1. Abrams, T. (2015, June 13). Notes on the social model of disability and critical physiotherapy: A response to Mike Oliver. Retrieved from
  2. Albrecht, G. L. (1992). The disability business: Rehabilitation in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (2004). Wasted lives: Modernity and its outcasts. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brand, D. (2006). Inventory. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
  5. Burke, L. (2014, July). The Alzheimer’s show: Dementia and its discontents. Keynote Address at the 5th Annual Theorizing Normalcy and the Mundane Conference. Sheffield University, UK.Google Scholar
  6. CBC (2007, June 22, 5:06 PM ET). “Neurological conditions cost Canada nearly $9B a year: Report. Retrieved from or
  7. Chan, B., & Hayes, B. (1998). Cost of stroke in Ontario, 1994/5. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 159(6S), S2–S8.Google Scholar
  8. Chouinard, V. (2018). Like Alice through the looking glass: II—The struggle for accommodation continues. In N. Hansen, R. Hanes, & D. Dreidger (Eds.), Untold Stories: A Canadian Disability History Reader (pp. 320–338). Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  9. CNIB [Canadian National Institute for the Blind]. (2009). The Cost of Vision Loss in Canada: Summary Report. Retrieved from
  10. Davidson, M. (2016). Missing bodies: Disappearances in the aesthetic. Cultural Critique, 92, 1–31. Scholar
  11. Ellison, R. (1952). Invisible man. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. Fineberg, N. A., Haddad, P. M., Carpenter, L., Gannon, B., Sharpe, R., Young, A. H., Joyce, E., Rowe, J., Wellsted, D., Nutt, J. D., & Sahakian, B. J. (2013). The size, burden and cost of disorders of the brain in the UK. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 27(9), 761–770. Retrieved from Scholar
  13. Flisfeder, M. (2013). “Debt: The Sublimated Object of Capital,” Topia. 30–31: 47–63Google Scholar
  14. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Garland-Thomson, R. (1997). Extraordinary bodies. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (2015, May 11). Making disability count: Demography, futurity, and the making of disability publics. Inhabitable Worlds. Retrieved from
  17. Goodley, D. (2007). Towards socially just pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian critical disability studies. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 317–334. Scholar
  18. Haiven, M., & Berland, J. (2013). Introduction: The financialized imagination (In memory of Stuart Hall). Topia, 30–31, 7–16.Google Scholar
  19. Harvard Magazine. (2014). Harvard School of Public Health unveils $450-million capital campaign. Retrieved from
  20. Harvard School of Public Health. (2006, April 26). Autism has high costs to U.S. society. Online press release. Retrieved from
  21. Heart & Stroke Foundation. (2013). Website: Statistics. Retrieved from
  22. Hughes, B. (2007). Being disabled: Towards a critical social ontology for disability studies. Disability & Society, 22(7), 673–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Illich, I., Zola, I. K., McKnight, J., Caplan, J., & Shaiken, H. (1977). Disabling professions. London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
  24. Mallett, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2012). Commodifying autism: The cultural contexts of ‘disability’ in the academy. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. Davis (Eds.), Disability and social theory: New developments and directions (pp. 33–51). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillian.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGuire, A. (2016). War on autism: On the cultural logic of normative violence. Michigan: University of Michigan Press. forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKittrick, K. (2013). Plantation futures. Small Axe, 42, 1–15. Scholar
  27. McKittrick, K. (2014). Mathematics Black Life. The BLACKSCHOLAR, 44(2), 16–28.Google Scholar
  28. McLaughlin, J., Goodley, D., Clavering, E., & Fisher, P. (2008). Families raising disabled children: Enabling care and social justice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McRuer, R. (2014, July 15). Crip displacements: Voices of disability, neoliberalism, and resistance. Disability Studies Network Seminar, Liverpool Hope University, UK.Google Scholar
  30. Mental Health Commission of Canada. (2013). Why investing in mental health will contribute to Canada’s economic prosperity and to the sustainability of our health care system: Backgrounder—Key facts. Retrieved from
  31. Michalko, R. (2002). The difference that disability makes. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. (2013). No time to wait: The healthy kids strategy. Toronto, ON: Queens Printer.Google Scholar
  35. Paulo F. (2017). “The Importance of the Act of Reading,” Journal of Education. Vol. 165(1): 5–11.
  36. Ralph, M. (2015). Impairment. In R. Adams, B. Reiss, & D. Serlin (Eds.), Keywords for disability studies (pp. 107–109). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rice, D. P. (2000). Cost of illness studies: What is good about them? Injury Prevention, 6, 177–179. Scholar
  38. Roberts, D. (2011). Fatal invention: How science, politics, and big business re-create race in the twenty-first Century. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  39. Runswick-Cole, K., & Goodley, D. (2015). Disability, austerity and cruel optimism in big society: Resistance and ‘the disability commons’. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 4(2), 162–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schutz, A. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, D. E. (1978 [1976 German]). ‘K is mentally ill’: The anatomy of a factual account. Sociology, 12, 23–53.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, D. E. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory and investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  43. Thomas, W. I. (1971 [1923]). On the definition of the situation. In M. Truzzi (Ed.), Sociology: The classical statements (274–277). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  44. Titchkosky, T. (2007). Reading and writing disability differently: The textured life of embodiment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  45. Titchkosky, T. (2011). The question of access: Disability, space, meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  46. Titchkosky, T. (2012). The ends of the body as pedagogic possibility. The Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies; special issue: Health, Embodiment, and Visual Culture, 34(3–4), 82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Titchkosky, T., & Aubrecht, K. (2015). Who’s mind, whose future? Mental health projects as colonial logics. Social Identities, 21(1), 68–94. Scholar
  48. Walcott, R. (2014, April 9). Zones of black death: Institutions, knowledges, and states of being or funk: A black note on the human. Antipode: Florida.
  49. WHO. (2006). Neurological disorders: Public health challenges. Geneva: WHO Press. Retrieved from Scholar
  50. WHO. (n.d.) Metrics: Disability-adjusted life year (DALY): Quantifying the burden of disease from mortality and morbidity. Retrieved December 19, 2019, from
  51. Wynter, S. (1994). No humans involved: An open letter to my colleagues. Forum: N.H.I.: Knowledge for the 21st Century: Knowledge on Trial, 1(1), 42–73.Google Scholar
  52. Wynter, S. (2015). On Being Human as Praxis. Edited by Katherine McKittrick Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations