Advertisement

“I Have to Be Black Before I Am Disabled”: Understanding Agency, Positionality, and Recognition in Higher Education

  • Lauren ShallishEmail author
Chapter
  • 11 Downloads
Part of the Critical Studies of Education book series (CSOE, volume 12)

Abstract

In a 2015 qualitative research study on undergraduate college students who identified as disabled, interview data demonstrated the complex ways in which racism and ableism entwined to extend or deny benefits in a postsecondary setting. At tension in the informants’ experiences was both the suppression of personhood and the celebration of it. The following examples represent two students in particular: A disabled, female-identified, queer, international student from Botswana and a disabled, female-identified, heterosexual, US citizen from New Hampshire, respectively: Taken from the larger context of their 90-minute interview, these testimonies make apparent the racial, linguistic, ethnic, and dis/abled positions that support or deny student agency on a college campus. They also signal the “interconnected and collusive” properties of racism and ableism (Annamma et al. 2013, p. 6). This sampling is not intended to set up a racialized dichotomy about disability-related experiences but rather explicate the ways race and ability entwine to frame students’ agency, positionality, and recognition in higher education settings. In line with DisCrit theorists who assert that “ability is distributed and withheld based on race through policies and practices” (Annamma and Morrison 2018, p. 72), this chapter will lay out the bodies of knowledge and research in disability law and higher education (specifically the fields of enrollment management, student affairs, and academic affairs) that have siloed inquiry on race and dis/ability, respectively, rather than contribute to knowledge about interlocking systems of racism and ableism. I will examine the literature on disproportionality in K–12 special education and offer implications for postsecondary education in an attempt to expose the larger structures that situate (or omit) dis/ability in the context of diversity work in higher education.

References

  1. Annamma, S. A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annamma, S. A., & Morrison, D. (2018). DisCrit classroom ecology: Using praxis to dismantle dysfunctional education ecologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Artiles, A., Kozleski, E., Trent, S., Osher, D., & Oritz, A. (2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968–2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnar-Brak, L., Lectenberger, D., & Lan, W. Y. (2010). Accommodation strategies of college students with disabilities. The Qualitative Report, 15(2), 411–429.Google Scholar
  5. Blackorby, J., & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the national longitudinal study. Exceptional Children, 62(5), 350–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchett, W. (2006). Disproportionate representation of African American students in special education: Acknowledging the role of white privilege and racism. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonilla-Silva, E. (1997). Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review, 62(3), 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bratlinger, E. (2004). Ideologies discerned, values determined: Getting past the hierarchies of special education. In L. Ware (Ed.), Ideology and the politics of (In)Exclusion (pp. 11–31). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  9. Burgstahler, S., & Cory, R. (2008). From accommodation to universal design. In S. Gabel & S. Danforth (Eds.), Disability and the politics of education: An international reader (pp. 561–577). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  10. Danforth, S. (2008). Using metaphors to research the cultural and ideological construction of disability. In S. Gabel & S. Danforth (Eds.), Disability & the politics of education (pp. 385–400). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, L. J. (2015). Diversity. In R. Adams, B. Reiss, & D. Serlin (Eds.), Keywords for disability studies (pp. 61–74). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Emens, E. (2013). Disabling attitudes: U.S. Disability Law and the ADA Amendments Act. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, N., Broido, E., Brown, K., & Wilke, A. (2017). Disability in higher education: A social justice approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Goodman, K. M., & Bowman, N. A. (2014). Making diversity work to improve college student learning. New Directions for Student Services, 2014(147), 37–48.Google Scholar
  15. Goodwin, S. A., & Morgan, S. (2012). Chronic illness and the academic career: A hidden epidemic in higher education. Academe. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/article/chronic-illness-and-academic-career.
  16. Guinier, L., Fine, M., & Balin, J. (1997). Becoming gentlemen: Women, law school, and institutional change. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Harbour, W. (2013). Inclusion in K-12 and higher education. In A. Kanter & B. Ferri (Eds.), Righting educational wrongs: Disability studies in law and education (pp. 294–306). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Holloway, S. (2001). The experience of higher education from the perspective of disabled students. Disability & Society, 16(4), 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hurtado, S., Laird, T. N., Landreman, L., Engberg, M., & Fernandez, E. (2001). College students’ classroom preparation for a diverse democracy. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  20. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, P.L. 108-446 20 U.S.C. §1400 (2004).Google Scholar
  21. Jehangir, R. R. (2003). Charting a new course: Learning communities and universal design. In J. L. Higbee (Ed.), Curriculum transformation and disability: Implementing universal design in higher education (pp. 79–92). Minneapolis, MN: Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  22. Komesaroff, L. (2005). Category politics: Deaf students’ inclusion in the “Hearing University”. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 9(4), 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matus-Grossman, L., & Gooden, S. T. (2001). Opening doors to earning credentials: Impressions of community college access and retention from low-wage workers. In: Paper presented at the Annual Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.Google Scholar
  24. National Association for Bilingual Education (NABE). (2002). Determining appropriate referrals of English language learners to special education: A self-assessment guide for principals. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
  25. Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A. M., & Shaver, D. (2010). Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school. A report of findings from the National longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS-2). Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education (NCSER2010–3008). Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2010_09/nlts2_report_2010_09_complete.pdf
  26. Ostiguy, B. J., Peters, M. L., & Shlasko, D. (2016). Ableism. In M. Adams & L. A. Bell (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (3rd ed., pp. 299–337). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Pascarella, E. T., Salisbury, M. H., Martin, G. L., & Blaich, C. (2012). Some complexities in the effects of diversity experiences on orientation toward social/political activism and political views in the first year of college. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(4), 467–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1997). Studying college students in the 21st century: Meeting new challenges. The Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 151–165.Google Scholar
  29. Rao, S. (2004). Faculty attitudes and students with disabilities in higher education: A literature review. College Student Journal, 38(2), 191–198.Google Scholar
  30. Reid, D., & McKnight, M. (2006). Disability justifies exclusion of minority students: A critical history grounded in disability studies. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Renn, K. (2000). Patterns of situational identity among biracial and multiracial college students. The Review of Higher Education, 23(4), 399–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sanford, C., Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A., & Shaver, D. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to six years after high school. Key findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
  33. Seifert, T. A., Goodman, K., King, P. M., & Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2010). Using mixed methods to study first-year college impact on liberal arts learning outcomes. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(3), 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Skiba, R., Simmons, A., Ritter, S., Gibb, A., Rausch, M., Cuadrado, J., & Chung, C. (2008). Achieving equity in special education: History, status, and current challenges. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 264–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smedley, A. (2007). Race in North America: Origin and evolution of a worldview (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sullivan, A. (2011). Disproportionality in special education identification and placement of English language learners. Exceptional Children, 77(3), 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Taylor, S. (2011). Disability studies in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 2011(154), 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tomlinson, S. (2004). Race and special education. In L. Ware (Ed.), Ideology and the politics of (in)exclusion (pp. 76–88). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Tregoning, M. E. (2009). “Getting it” as an ally: Interpersonal relationships between colleagues with and without disabilities. Making good on the promise: Student affairs professionals with disabilities. Washington, DC: ACPA-College Student Educators International and University Press of America.Google Scholar
  40. Vernon, A., & Swain, J. (2002). Theorizing divisions and hierarchies: Towards a commonality or diversity? In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, & L. Bardon (Eds.), Disability studies today (pp. 77–97). Bodmin, Cornwall, England: MPG Books.Google Scholar
  41. Voulgarides, C. (2018). Does compliance matter in special education?: IDEA and the hidden inequities of practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  42. Williams, W. M., & Ceci, S. J. (1999, August 6). Accommodating learning disabilities can bestow unfair advantages. The Chronicle of Higher Education, B4–B5.Google Scholar
  43. Winkle-Wagner, R., & Locks, A. (2014). Diversity and inclusion on campus: Supporting racially and ethnically underrepresented students. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The College of New JerseyEwing TownshipUSA

Personalised recommendations