Advertisement

Introduction

  • Véronique Decaix
  • Ana María Mora-MárquezEmail author
Chapter
  • 13 Downloads
Part of the Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind book series (SHPM, volume 23)

Abstract

In this introduction, we explain how the chapters in this volume give support to the idea that different accounts of active cognition in the history of philosophy directly or indirectly respond to Aristotle’s account of cognition in his De anima.

References

  1. Alexander of Aphrodisias. (2008). De anima. In R. W. Sharples (Ed.), Alexander Aphrodisiensis De anima libri mantissa: A new edition of the Greek text with introduction and commentary. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  2. Augustine. (1939). De quantitate animae. In P. de Labriolle (Ed.), Dialogues philosophiques II (Biblioth`eque Augustinienne, Vol. 5, pp. 226–396). Paris: Descl´ee de Brouwer.Google Scholar
  3. Augustine. (1955). De civitate dei. In B. Dombard & A. Kalb. Corpus (Eds.), De civitate dei. Libri I–X (Christianorum Series Latina, Vol. 47). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  4. Augustine. (1968). De trinitate. In W. J. Mountain (Ed.), De Trinitate libri XV (Corpus christianorum Series Latina, Vol. 50–50A). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  5. Augustine. (1972). De Gen. ad litt. In P. Agaësse & A. Solignac (Eds.), De Genesi ad litteram libri duodecim, VIII–XII (Biblioth`eque Augustinienne, Vol. 49). Paris: Descl´ee de Brouwer.Google Scholar
  6. Augustine. (1981). Confessionum. In L. Verheijen (Ed.), Sancti Augustini Confessionum libri XIII (Corpus christianorum Series Latina, Vol. 27). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  7. Averroes. (1953). In De an. In F. S. Crawford (Ed.), Averrois Cordubensis commentarium magnum in Aristotelis De anima libros (Corpus commentariorum Averrois in Aristotelem VI, Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: The Academy of America.Google Scholar
  8. Bakker, P. J. J. M., & Thijsen, J. M. M. H. (Eds.). (2007). Mind, cognition and representation. The tradition of commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. Balldriaux, O. (1989). Themistius et l’ex´eg`ese de la no´etique aristot´elicienne. Revue de philosophie ancienne, 7, 199–233.Google Scholar
  10. Barbotin, Edmond. (1954). La thˊeorie aristotˊelicienne de l’intellect d’aprˋes Thˊeophraste. Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
  11. Blumenthal, H. J. (1971). Plotinus’ psychology. His doctrines of the embodied soul. La Hague: M. Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blumenthal, H. J. (1987). Alexander of Aphrodisias in the later Greek commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima. In J. Wiesner (Ed.), Aristoteles: Werk und Wirkung (Vol. II, pp. 90–106). Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  13. Brentano, F. (1867). Die Psychologie des Aristoteles, insbesondere seine Lehre vom NOUS POIETICOS. Mainz: Franz Kirchheim.Google Scholar
  14. Burnyeat, M. F. (2002). De anima II.5. Phronesis 47(1), 28–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caston, V. (1999). Aristotle’s two intellects: A modest proposal. Phronesis, 44(3), 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiaradonna, R. (2012). Plotinus’ account of the cognitive powers of the soul: Sense perception and discursive thought. Topoi, 31(2), 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davidson, H. A. (1992). Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes on intellect. Their cosmologies, theories of the active intellect and theories of human intellect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Decaix, V. (Forthcoming). L’aiguillion de l’affect. Le sens de la conscience chez Pierre de Jean Olivi.Google Scholar
  19. Duns Scotus. (1963). Ordinatio I, dist. 26–48. In Opera Omnia (Vol. 6). Vatican: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.Google Scholar
  20. Emilsson, E. K. (2007). Plotinus on intellect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Everson, S. (1997). Aristotle on perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Flasch, K. (1972). Kennt die mittelalterische Philosophie die konstitutive Funktion des menschlichen Denkens? Eine Untersuchung zu Dietrich von Freiberg. Kant Studies, 63, 182–206.Google Scholar
  23. Francisco Su´arez. (1856–1861). Disputationes metaphysicae. In: Opera Omnia (Vol. 26–27). Paris: Viv`es.Google Scholar
  24. Francisco Su´arez. (1978–1991). In De anima. In S. Castellote Cubells (Ed.), Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in libros Aristotelis de anima (3 Vols.). Madrid: Labor.Google Scholar
  25. Frede, M. (1996). La th´eorie aristot´elicienne de l’intellect agent. In G. Romeyer-Dherbey & C. Viano (Eds.), Corps et âme: Sur le De anima d’Aristote (pp. 377–390). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  26. Gerson, L. P. (2018). Plotinus. In A. Marmodoro & S. Cartwright (Eds.), A history of mind and body in late antiquity (pp. 67–84). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hutchinson, D. M. (2018). Plotinus on Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ierodiakonou, K. (2016). Theophrastus. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/theophrastus/
  29. Kosman, A. (1992). What does the maker mind make? In M. Nussbaum & A. Rorty (Eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima (pp. 343–358). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lagerlund, H. (2010). Forming the mind. Essays on the internal senses and the mind/body problem from Avicenna to the medical enlightenment. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Magrin, S. (2011). Theophrastus, Alexander, and Themistius on Aristotle’s De anima III.4–5. In R. Wisnovsky et al. (Eds.), Vehicles of transmission, translation, and transformation in medieval textual culture (pp. 49–74). Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mora-M´arquez, A. M. (2019). Singular intellection in medieval commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima. Vivarium, 57(3–4), 293–316.Google Scholar
  33. Moraux, P. (1942). Alexandre d’Aphrodise. Exˊegˋete de la Noˊetique d’Aristote. Paris: E. Droz.Google Scholar
  34. Moraux, P. (1978). Le De anima dans la tradition grecque: quelques aspects de l’interpr´etation du trait´e, de Th´eophraste `a Th´emistius. In G. E. R. Lloyd & G. E. L. Owen (Eds.), Aristotle on mind and the senses. Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium Aristotelicum (pp. 280–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. O’Daly, G. (1987). Augustine’s philosophy of mind. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pasnau. R. (1997). Theories of cognition in the later middle ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Perler, D. (Ed.). (2003). Thˊeories de l’intentionnalitˊe au Moyen Âge. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  38. Peter John Olivi. (1926). In Sent. II. In B. Jansen (Ed.), Quaestiones in secundum librum Sententiarum (Vol. 3). Quaracchi: S. Bonaventurae.Google Scholar
  39. Schroeder, F. M. (1984). Light and the active intellect in Alexander and Plotinus. Hermes, 112(2), 239–248.Google Scholar
  40. Silva, J. F., & Yrjönsuuri, M. (Eds.). (2014). Active perception in the history of philosophy: From Plato to modern philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Sorabji, R. (1992). Intentionality and physiological processes: Aristotle’s theory of sense-perception. In M. Nussbaum & A. O. Rorty (Eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De anima (pp. 195–225). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sorabji, R. (2001). Aristotle on sensory processes and intentionality. A reply to Myles Burnyeat. In D. Perler (Ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality (pp. 49–63). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  43. Thomas Aquinas. (1930). Contra gentiles. In Summa contra gentiles III. Opera omnia t. XIII. Roma: Commissio Leonina.Google Scholar
  44. Thomas Aquinas. (1933). In sent. In M. F. Moos (Ed.), Scriptum super sententiis magistri Petri Lombardi, d. 1–21, t. III. Paris: Lethielleux.Google Scholar
  45. Thomas Aquinas. (1950). In De anima. In Sentencia libri de anima. Opera omnia t. XLV/1. Rome: Commissio Leonina.Google Scholar
  46. Thomas Aquinas. (1970). De veritate. In Quaestiones disputatae de veritate. Quaestiones 1–7. Opera omnia t. XXII/1.2. Rome: Commissio Leonina.Google Scholar
  47. Thomas Aquinas. (1972). De veritate. In Quaestiones disputatae de veritate. Quaestiones 8–20. Opera omnia t. XXII/2.1. Rome: Commissio Leonina.Google Scholar
  48. Thomas Aquinas. (1973). De veritate. In Quaestiones disputatae de veritate. Quaestiones 21–29. Opera omnia t. XXII/3.1. Rome: Commission Leonina.Google Scholar
  49. Thomas Aquinas. (1988). ST Ia. In Prima pars summae theologiae. Opera omnia t. IV. Rome: Commissio Leonina.Google Scholar
  50. Thomas Aquinas. (1996). Quaestiones disputatae de anima. In: Opera omnia, t. XXIV/1. Rome-Paris: Commissio Leonina, Cerf.Google Scholar
  51. Thomas Aquinas. (Forthcoming). De potentia. In: Quaestiones de potentia Dei. Opera Omnia t. XXI. Rome: Comission Leonina.Google Scholar
  52. Toivanen, J. (2013). Perception and the internal senses. Peter John Olivi on the cognitive functions of the sensitive soul. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  53. Tuominen, M. (2006). Aristotle and Alexander of Aphrodisias on the active intellect. In V. Hirvonen, T. J. Holopainen, & M. Tuominen Mind and modality: Studies in the history of philosophy in Honour of Simo Knuuttila (pp. 55–70). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  54. Tuominen, M. (2010). Receptive reason: Alexander of Aphrodisias on material intellect. Phronesis, 55, 170–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wassmer, T. A. (1960). The trinitarian theology of augustine and his debt to Plotinus. Harvard Theological Review, 53(4), 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Paris 1, Panthéon-SorbonneParisFrance
  2. 2.Gothenburg University (FLoV)GothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations