Identifying Prospective Teachers’ Perceived Competence Towards Use of Assessment and Evaluation Methods

  • Saide SadıkoğluEmail author
  • Cigdem Hursen
  • Erkan Bal
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1095)


The purpose of this study is to identify prospective teachers’ perceived competence towards using assessment and evaluation methods. In addition, the study also aims to explore the problems that prospective teachers face when using assessment and evaluation methods. A total of 100 prospective teachers at their final year of studies at the Department of Early Childhood Education of a private university participated in the study. The results of the study revealed that the prospective teachers mostly prefer to use traditional assessment and evaluation methods and face-to-face assessment methods. It was also identified that the prospective teachers’ perceived competence towards using assessment and evaluation methods are at medium level.


Product-oriented assessment methods Process-oriented assessment methods Prospective teachers Early childhood education 


  1. 1.
    Kilmen, S., Kösterelioğlu, İ.: Examination of teachers’ perceptions towards alternative assessment approaches with CHAID analysis. Elementary Educ. Online 16(1), 256–273 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jones, C.A.: Assessment for learning. Vocational Learning Support Programme, 16–19 (2005).
  3. 3.
    Baird, J.A., Hopfenbeck, T.N., Newton, P., Stobart, G., Steen–Utheim, A.T.: State of the Field R. Assessment and Learning. Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment Report OUCEA, 14(2) (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Toptaş, V.: Classroom teachers’ perceptions about the use of alternative assessment and evaluation methods in mathematics courses. Educ. Sci. 36(159), 205–219 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Şad, S.N., Göktaş, Ö.: Investigation of traditional and alternative measurement and evaluation approaches among teaching staff at higher education. Ege Eğitim Dergisi 2(14), 79–105 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gelbal, S., Kelecioğlu, H.: Teachers’ proficiency perceptions of about the measurement and evaluation techniques and the problems they confront. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. J. Educ.) 33, 135–145 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hursen, C., Birkollu, S.S.: Determining the relationship between teachers’ attitudes towards the use of process-oriented measurement tools and self-efficacy perceptions. Folklor/edebiyat 25(97–1), 462–477 (2019)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Öztürk, Y.A., Şahin, Ç.: Pre-service teachers’ views on difficulties on implementation of process-oriented assessment and evaluation methods. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 36, 109–129 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ektem, I.S., Keçici, S.E., Pilten, G.: The opinions of primary teachers related with process oriented measurement and evaluation methods. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD) 17(3), 661–680 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Near East UniversityMersin 10Turkey

Personalised recommendations