Advertisement

Men in Finance for Emancipatory Social Change?

  • Anika ThymEmail author
Chapter
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter addresses the question of how men contribute to achieving gender equality and, more broadly, emancipatory change, by focusing on a social group that is usually less associated with emancipatory change and critique, and more with the (re)production of hegemonic masculinity and the hegemony of men: men in leading positions in the financial sector. It uses a threefold perspective on the political dimension of gender: concerning a person’s mode of existence, their agency and concerning the political constitution of the social. This question of how men in leading positions in the financial sector struggle with and question gender relations in their workplace, and the role their industry plays in society, is followed up by analysing two published autobiographical books by men who were in prestigious senior positions in the financial sector. They describe (self)critical reflections on their work and life. These autobiographies show how the ‘personal is political, gendered and economic’, to adapt the feminist slogan, from their specific inside angle and thereby offer insights into potentials and challenges for gender equality as an aspect of emancipatory change on an individual, institutional and societal level.

Keywords

Critical studies on men and masculinities Hegemony of men Hegemonic masculinity Social studies on finance Gender studies Gender equality Emancipation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

For helpful feedback I would like to thank Jeff Hearn and the Center for Feminist Social Studies, Örebro University, Andrea Maihofer, Birgit Sauer, Sophie Bürgi, Walter Hoffmann, Oliver Braunschweig and the reviewers.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham NC: Combined Academic Publ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, G. (2010). Cityboy: Beer and loathing in the square mile (ebook). John Murray.Google Scholar
  3. Bargetz, B., Ludwig, G., & Sauer, B. (2015). Gouvernementalität und Geschlecht: Politische Theorie im Anschluss an Michel Foucault. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). L’illusion biographique. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 62(1), 69–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1986.2317
  5. Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Bremer, H., & Teiwes-Kügler, C. (2014). Habitusanalyse als Habitus-Hermeneutik. Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung, 14(2), 199–219. doi: https://doi.org/10.3224/zqf.v14i2.16382
  7. Butler, J. (2008). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Connell, R. (1998). Männer in der Welt: Männlichkeiten und Globalisierung. Widersprüche, 18(67), 91–105.Google Scholar
  9. Connell, R. (2010). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Connell, R., & Wood, J. (2005). Globalization and business masculinities. Men and Masculinities, 7(4), 347–364.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03260969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornwall, A., Karioris, F. G., & Lindisfarne, N. (Eds.). (2016). Masculinities under Neoliberalism. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  12. Crenshaw, K. (2015). On intersectionality: The essential writings of Kimberlé Crenshaw. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  13. Demirović, A. (2007). Demokratie in der Wirtschaft: Positionen, Probleme, Perspektiven. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  14. Demirović, A. (2008). Neoliberalismus und Hegemonie. In Neoliberalismus (pp. 17–33). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90899-1_2
  15. Demirović, A. (2013). Kritik der Politik. In R. Jaeggi & D. Loick (Eds.), Nach Marx: Philosophie, Kritik, Praxis (pp. 463–485). Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  16. Demirović, A., & Maihofer, A. (2013). Vielfachkrise und und die Krise der Geschlechterverhältnisse. In H. M. Nickel & A. Heilmann (Eds.), Krise, Kritik, Allianzen: Arbeits- und geschlechtersoziologische Perspektiven (pp. 30–48). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.Google Scholar
  17. Equality and Human Rights Commission. (2009). Financial services inquiry: Sex discrimination and gender pay gap report of the equality and human rights commission. Manchester/Glasgow/Cardiff.Google Scholar
  18. Frevert, U. (1986). Frauen-Geschichte: Zwischen Bürgerlicher Verbesserung und Neuer Weiblichkeit. (H.-U. Wehler, Ed.) (Erstausgabe.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Gramsci, A. (1998). Prison notebooks: Selections. (G. Nowell-smith, trans.) (New ed.). London: Lawrence and Wishart Ltd..Google Scholar
  20. Gregory, M. R. (2009). ‘Talking sports’: Sports and the construction of hegemonic masculinities at work. In M. F. Özbilgin (Ed.), Equality, diversity and inclusion at work: A research companion (pp. 399–412). Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Pub.Google Scholar
  21. Handon, V. (2015). Die Psycho-Trader: aus dem Innenleben unseres kranken Finanzsystems: ein Insider erzählt. Frankfurt a.M.: Westend.Google Scholar
  22. Hearn, J. (2004). From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory, 5(1), 49–72.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700104040813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hearn, J. (2013). Contradictory male/masculine/men’s “I”s: The unwriting of men, and the concept of gex. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses (RCEI), (66), 13–24.Google Scholar
  24. Hearn, J. (2015). Men of the world: Genders, globalizations, transnational times. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ho, K. (2009). Liquidated: An ethnography of wall street (unknown edition.). Durham: Duke University Press Books.Google Scholar
  26. Hoffmann, W. K. (2003). Macht im Management. Ein Tabu wird protokolliert. Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag.Google Scholar
  27. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment. (G. S. Noeri, Ed.). Stanford, California: Cultural Memory in the Present.Google Scholar
  28. Iwamoto, D. K., Cheng, A., Lee, C. S., Takamatsu, S., & Gordon, D. (2011). “Man-ing” up and getting drunk: The role of masculine norms, alcohol intoxication and alcohol-related problems among college men. Addictive Behaviors, 36(9), 906–911.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.04.005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson, D. (2015). Unmasking masculinity (Routledge revivals): A critical autobiography (ebook). Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Kerfoot, D., & Knights, D. (1993). Management, manipulation and masculinity: From paternalism to corporate strategy in Financial Services in Britain. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 659–677.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00320.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koller, H.C. (2012). Anders werden. Zur Erforschung transformatorischer Bildungsprozesse. In I. Miethe & H.R. Müller (Eds.), Qualitative Bildungsforschung und Bildungstheorie (pp. 19–33). Opladen u.a.: Budrich.Google Scholar
  32. Lämmlin, G., & Pohlmann, M. (Eds.). (2011). Neue Werte in den Führungsetagen: Kontinuität und Wandel in der Wirtschaftselite. Karlsruhe: Evangelische Akademie.Google Scholar
  33. Lindisfarne, N., & Neale, J. (2016). Masculinities and the lived experience of neoliberalism. In A. Cornwall, F. G. Karioris, & N. Lindisfarne (Eds.), Masculinities under Neoliberalism (pp. 29–50). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  34. Maihofer, A. (1995). Geschlecht als Existenzweise. Macht, Moral, Recht und Geschlechterdifferenz. Frankfurt am Main: Ulrike Helmer.Google Scholar
  35. Maihofer, A. (2013). Philosophie als anti-metaphysische Haltung zur Welt. In D. Grisard, U. Jäger, & T. König (Eds.), Verschieden sein: Nachdenken über Geschlecht und Differenz (pp. 307–319). Sulzbach: Ulrike Helmer.Google Scholar
  36. Maihofer, A. (2014). Hegemoniale Selbstaffirmierung und Veranderung. In K. Hostettler & S. Vögele (Eds.), Diesseits der imperialen Geschlechterordnung. (Post)koloniale Reflexionen über den Westen (pp. 305–318). Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  37. Maihofer, A. (2015). Sozialisation und Geschlecht. In K. Hurrelmann, U. Bauer, M. Grundmann, & S. Walper (Eds.), Handbuch Sozialisationsforschung (pp. 630–658). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  38. Maihofer, A. (2018). Pluralisierung familialer Lebensformen - Zerfall der Gesellschaft oder neoliberal passgerecht? In K. Pühl & B. Sauer (Eds.), Kapitalismuskritische Gesellschaftsanalyse: queerfeministische Positionen (pp. 113–138). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  39. Marx, K. (1978). On the Jewish question. In The Marx-Engels reader (pp. 26–46). New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  40. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2010). The communist manifesto. CreateSpace Independent Publisher.Google Scholar
  41. Meuser, M. (2010). Geschlecht und Männlichkeit: Soziologische Theorie und kulturelle Deutungsmuster (3rd ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  42. Mitropoulos, A. (2011). From precariousness to risk management and beyond. European institute for progressive cultural policies. http://eipcp.net/transversal/0811/mitropoulos/en
  43. Poynting, S., & Donaldson, M. (2005). Snakes and leaders: Hegemonic masculinity in ruling-class boys’ boarding schools. Men and Masculinities, 7(4), 325–346.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03260968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ruttenberg, D. (2009). The hermeneutics of curiosity. On reclamation. In E. Goldstein, A. Diamant, & D. Berman (Eds.), New Jewish feminism: Probing the past, forging the future (pp. 59–65). Woodstock, Vt: Jewish Lights Pub.Google Scholar
  45. Sauer, B. (2010). Das Geschlecht der Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise: eine Intervention in aktuelle Krisendeutungen. Kurswechsel: Zeitschrift für gesellschafts-, wirtschafts- und umweltpolitische Alternativen, 1, 38–46.Google Scholar
  46. Sauer, B. (2015). Feministische Staatskonzeption als Digestive. Staat im Spätwerk Foucaults. In B. Bargetz, G. Ludwig, & B. Sauer (Eds.), Gouvernementalität und Geschlecht: Politische Theorie im Anschluss an Michel Foucault (pp. 90–116). Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  47. Sauer, B., & Starck, K. (2014). Political masculinities: Introduction. In A Man’s world?: Political masculinities in literature and culture (pp. 3–10). Newcastle: CSP.Google Scholar
  48. Sedgwick, E. K. (2002). Paranoid Reading and reparative Reading, or, You’re so paranoid, you probably think this essay is about you. In M. A. Barale, J. Goldberg, & M. Moon (Eds.), Touching Feeling (pp. 123–151). Duke University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384786-005
  49. Starck, K., & Luyt, R. (2019). Political masculinities, crisis tendencies, and social transition: toward an understanding of change. Men and Masculinities, 1097184X1878273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18782730
  50. Thym, A. (2018). Hegemony self-critique: How men in finance question aspects of masculine and economic hegemony from within. In J. Hearn, E. V. del Aguila, & M. Hughson (Eds.), Unsustainable institutions of men: Transnational dispersed centres, gender power, contradictions (pp. 71–86). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wagner-Egelhaaf, M. (2000). Autobiographie. Stuttgart Weimar: J.B. Metzler.Google Scholar
  52. Walker, C., & Roberts, S. (Eds.). (2018). Masculinity, labour, and neoliberalism: Working-class men in international perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. Woolf, V. (1963). Three guineas. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  54. Zaloom, C. (2006). Out of the Pits: Traders and Technology from Chicago to London. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Gender StudiesUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations