Advertisement

The Politics of Absent Men or Political Masculinities Without the Polis

  • Jeff HearnEmail author
Chapter
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter interrogates political masculinities as agents for change through the prism of absence, without the polis. Following an initial discussion of political masculinities in relation to, first, mainstream politics, and, then, feminism, possible changes in political masculinities formed through absence, and their implications for profeminist men’s politics, are interrogated. Three main forms of absence are examined: absences by transnational/global processes, beyond the nation; technological absences, of virtuality and disembodiment in cyberspace; and bodily absences, as, for example, with ageing. These changes, and moreover their interconnections, are seen as creating new gender power structures, but also offering some signs of hope, with greater transnational connections, collaborations and indeed new subversive political masculinities.

Keywords

Absence Age Bodies Feminism Globalization Masculinities Men Polis Political Transnational Virtualization 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This chapter is a development of the keynote at the Political Masculinities as Agents of Change Conference, Anglia Polytechnic University, Cambridge, UK, December 2016. I am grateful to Russell Luyt and Kathleen Starck, as conference organizers, Stephen Burrell and Maria Sagmeister (2017) for providing generous commentaries on my presentation, and the editors and anonymous reviewers for multiple helpful comments on earlier drafts.

References

  1. Ashe, F. (2007). The new politics of masculinity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balkmar, D., & Hearn, J. (2019). Men, automobility, movements, and the environment: Imagining (un)sustainable, automated transport futures. In J. Hearn, E. Vasquez del Aguila, & M. Hughson (Eds.), Unsustainable institutions of men: Transnational dispersed centres, gender power, contradictions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, R., Blake, V., Hearn, J., Jackson, D., Johnson, R., Luczynski, Z., et al. (2016). The older men’s memory work group. In Men’s stories for a change: Ageing men remember. Champaign: Aging and Society, and Common Ground.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker, C., & Jane, E. (2016). Cultural studies: Theory and practice (5th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Blake, V., Hearn, J., Johnson, R., Jackson, D., Barber, R., & Luczynski, Z. (2016). Doing memory work with older men: The practicalities, the process, the potential. Working with Older People, 20(4), 209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blake, V., Hearn, J., Jackson, D., Johnson, R., Barber, R., & Luczynski, Z. (2018). Ageing, gender politics and masculinities: Reflections on collective memory work with older men. Working with Older People, 22(2), 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridges, T., & Pascoe, C. J. (2014). Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Sociology Compass, 8(3), 246–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burrell, S. R., & Sagmeister, M. (2017). Conference report: political masculinities as agents of change, Anglia Ruskin University, 9–11 December 2016. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 12(1), 80–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrigan, T., Connell, R., & Lee, J. (1985). Towards a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society, 14(5), 551–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, L. M. G., & Lange, L. (Eds.). (1979). The sexism of social and political theory: Women and reproduction from Plato to Nietzsche. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cleaver, F. (Ed.). (2002). Masculinities matter! Men, gender and development. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  12. Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Connell, R. (2016). 100 million kalashnikovs: Gendered power on a world scale. Debate Feminista, 51, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cornwall, A., & Lindisfarne, N. (Eds.). (1994). Dislocating masculinity: Comparative ethnographies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Cornwall, A., Edström, J., & Greig, A. (Eds.). (2011). Men and development: Politicising masculinities. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  16. Cornwall, A., Karioris, F. G., & Lindisfarne, N. (Eds.). (2016). Masculinities under neoliberalism. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  17. Demetriou, D. (2001). Connell’s concept of hegemonic masculinity: A critique. Theory and Society, 30(3), 337–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donaldson, M., Hibbins, R., Howson, R., & Pease, B. (Eds.). (2009). Migrant men: Critical studies of masculinities and the migration experience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Egeberg Holmgren, L., & Hearn, J. (2009). Framing ‘men in feminism’: Theoretical locations, local contexts and practical passings in men’s gender-conscious positionings on gender equality and feminism. Journal of Gender Studies, 18(4), 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. El Feki, S., Heilman, B., & Barker, G. (Eds.). (2017). Understanding masculinities: Results from the International Men and Gender Equality Survey (IMAGES) – Middle East and North Africa. Cairo/ Washington: UN Women/Promundo-US.Google Scholar
  21. Enarson, E., & Pease, B. (Eds.). (2016). Men, masculinities and disaster. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere. Social Text, 25(26), 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuentes-Nieva, R., & Galasso, N. (2014). Working for the few: Political capture and economic inequality. Oxford: Oxfam International.Google Scholar
  25. Ging, D. (2017). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities Online first.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401, 638, 657, 22
  26. Hall, M., & Hearn, J. (2017). Revenge pornography: Gender, sexuality, motivations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanlon, N. (2012). Masculinities, care and equality: identity and nurture in men’s lives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hardoon, D., Ayele, S., & Fuentes-Nieva, R. (2016). An economy for the 1%. Oxford: Oxfam International. https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bp210-economy-one-percent-tax-havens-180116-en_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
  29. Haug, F. (1987). Female sexualisation. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Hearn, J. (1992). Men in the public eye. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hearn, J. (1996). Deconstructing the dominant: Making the one(s) the other(s). Organization, 3(4), 611–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hearn, J. (2014). Sexualities, organizations and organization sexualities: Future scenarios and the impact of socio-technologies (a transnational perspective from the global ‘North’). Organization, 21(3), 397–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hearn, J. (2015a). Men of the world. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Hearn, J. (2015b). Uses and abuses of the political category of “men” in activism, policy and theorising. In M. Flood & R. Howson (Eds.), Engaging with men in gender equality (pp. 34–54). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  35. Hearn, J., & Parkin, W. (2001). Gender, sexuality and violence in organizations: The unspoken forces of organization violations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Hearn, J., Blagojević, M., & Harrison, K. (Eds.). (2013). Rethinking transnational men: Eyond, between and within nations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Hearn, J., Vasquez del Aguila, E., & Hughson, M. (Eds.). (2019). Unsustainable institutions of men: Transnational dispersed centres, gender power, contradictions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Holter, Ø. G. (2014). What’s in it for men?’ Old question, new data. Men and Masculinities, 17(5), 515–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hughson, J., & Hughson, M. (2019). Transnational football’s male elite: The unsustainability of FIFA? In J. Hearn, E. V. del Aguila, & M. Hughson (Eds.), Unsustainable institutions of men: Transnational dispersed centres, gender power, contradictions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Jackson, D. (2001). Masculinity challenges to an ageing man’s embodied selves: Struggles, collusions and resistances. Auto/Biography, 9(1 & 2), 107–115.Google Scholar
  41. Jackson, D. (2003). Beyond one-dimensional models of masculinity: A life-course perspective on the processes of becoming masculine. Auto/Biography, 11(1 & 2), 71–87.Google Scholar
  42. Jackson, D. (2016). Exploring aging masculinities: The body, sexuality and social Lives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jones, A. (Ed.). (2006). Men of the global South: A reader. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  44. Levtov, R., Barker, G., Contreras-Urbina, M., Heilman, B., & Verma, R. (2014). Pathways to gender equitable men: Findings from the international men and gender equality survey in eight countries. Men and Masculinities, 17(5), 467–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lilly, M. (2016). ‘The world is not a safe place for men’: The representational politics of the manosphere. MA thesis, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
  46. Lloyd, G. (1984). The man of reason: ‘male’ & ‘female. In Western philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Lorber, J. (Ed.). (2005). Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  48. Messerschmidt, J., & Bridges, T. (2017). Trump and the politics of fluid masculinities. Online 21 July. https://gendersociety.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/trump-and-the-politics-of-fluid-masculinities/.
  49. Messner, M. A. (1993). ‘Changing men’ and feminist politics in the United States. Theory and Society, 22(5), 723–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Messner, M. A. (1997). Politics of masculinities. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Moravec, H. (1988). Mind children: The future of robot and human intelligence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Morrell, R. (Ed.). (2001). Changing men in Southern Africa. Durban: University of Natal Press; London: Zed.Google Scholar
  53. Murphy, T. (2015, 9 April). ‘Aid to poor countries fell, shows report’. Humanosphere http://www.humanosphere.org/world-politics/2015/04/aid-poor-countries-fell-shows-report/. Accessed 14 Aug 2017
  54. Nagle, A. (2017). Kill all normies: Online culture wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the alt-right. New York: Zero.Google Scholar
  55. O’Brien, M. (1981). The politics of reproduction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  56. O’Hara, D., & Mason, L.R. (2012, March 30). How bots are taking over the world. The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/mar/30/how-bots-are-taking-over-the-world.
  57. Oxfam. (2017). An economy for the 99%: It’s time to build a human economy that benefits everyone. In Not just the privileged few. Oxford: Oxfam. https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bp-economy-for-99-percent-160117-en.pdfGoogle Scholar
  58. Palace, S. (2012). ‘To be liberated from them (or through them)’: A call for a new approach. LIES: A Journal of Materialist Feminism, 1, 209–214.Google Scholar
  59. Peacock, D., & Barker, G. (2014). Working with men and boys to prevent gender-based violence: Principles, lessons learned, and ways forward. Men and Masculinities, 17(5), 578–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pease, B., & Pringle, K. (Eds.). (2002). A man’s world: Changing men’s practices in a globalized world. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  61. Perlo-Freeman, S., Fleurant, A., Wezeman, P. D., & Wezeman, S. T. (2015). Trends in world military expenditure, 2014. Stockholm: SIPRI. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/193234/SIPRIFS1504.pdfGoogle Scholar
  62. Philpponnat, T. (2014). Can finance be put in the service of the transition? Francqui international conference 2014, the EU’s fifth project: Transitional governance in the service of sustainable societies, Brussels.Google Scholar
  63. Population ageing in Europe: Facts, implications and policies: Outcomes of EU-funded research (2014). Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/policy_reviews/kina26426enc.pdf.
  64. Portillo, H., & Molano, S. (2017a, April 4). Approaching corruption through the lens of masculinities. CDA Perspectives Blog, http://cdacollaborative.org/blog/approaching-corruption-lens-masculinities/.
  65. Portillo, H., & Molano, S. (2017b, June 25). Masculinity, machismo and corruption. Voice Male. https://voicemalemagazine.org/masculinity-machismo-corruption/.
  66. Poster, W. (2013). Subversions of techno-masculinity: Indian ICT professionals in the global economy. In J. Hearn, M. Blagojević, & K. Harrison (Eds.), Rethinking transnational men: Beyond, between and within nations (pp. 113–133). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Räty, R., & Carlsson-Kanyama, A. (2009). Comparing energy use by gender, age, and income in some European countries. Stockholm: Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut.Google Scholar
  68. Ritzer, G. (1983). The McDonaldization of society. Journal of American Culture, 6(1), 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ritzer, G. (1993/2011). The McDonaldization of society (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  70. Ruspini, E., Hearn, J., Pease, B., & Pringle, K. (Eds.). (2011). Men and Masculinities around the world. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  71. Santos, B. d. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  72. Sargent, L. (1981). New left women and men: The honeymoon is over. In L. Sargent (Ed.), Women and Revolution (pp. ix–xxix). Boston, South End Press.Google Scholar
  73. Sennett, R. (1977). The fall of public man. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  74. Shanley, M. L., & Pateman, C. (1991). Feminist interpretations and political theory. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Shefer, T., Ratele, K., Strebel, A., Shabalala, N., & Buikema, R. (Eds.). (2007). From boys to men: Social constructions of masculinity in contemporary society. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press and HSRC (Human Science Research Council) Press.Google Scholar
  76. Shefer, T., Hearn, J., Ratele, K., & Boonzaier, F. (Eds.). (2018). Engaging youth in activist research and pedagogical praxis: Transnational perspectives on gender, sex, and race. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Spierings, N., & Zaslove, A. (2015). Gendering the vote for populist radical-right parties. Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1–2), 135–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Starck, K., & Luyt, R. (2019). Political masculinities, crisis tendencies, and social transition: Toward an understanding of change. Men and Masculinities, online first.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18782730
  79. Starck, K., & Sauer, B. (Eds.). (2014). A man’s world? political masculinities in literature and culture. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  80. Sum, N.-L., & Jessop, B. (2013). Towards a cultural political economy: Putting culture in its place in political economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tian, N., Fleurant, A., Wezeman, P. D., & Wezeman, S. T. (2017). Trends in world military expenditure, 2016. Stockholm: SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/Trends-world-military-expenditure-2016.pdfGoogle Scholar
  82. Urry, J. (2014). Offshoring. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  83. US National Conference of State Legislature. (2014). Revenge porn. Retrieved April 4, 2015from www.ncsl.org/research/telecommunications-and-information-technology/state-revenge-porn-legislation.
  84. Van der Gaag, N. (2014). Feminism & men. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  85. Wellman, B. (2001). Physical space and cyberspace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Young, B., Bakker, I., & Elson, D. (Eds.). (2011). Questioning financial governance from a feminist perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gender StudiesÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
  2. 2.Hanken School of EconomicsHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.University of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK

Personalised recommendations